Factors associated with visual field defects of optic disc drusen.

To investigate the prevalence and risk factors for visual field defect in patients with optic disc drusen (ODD).We assessed the visual field status of patients with ODD whose diagnosis were confirmed by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). Visual field defects were classified as no...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kyoung Min Lee, Se Joon Woo, Jeong-Min Hwang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2018-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5927402?pdf=render
id doaj-e733e6c9872c4c389b2845fdd7b51d03
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e733e6c9872c4c389b2845fdd7b51d032020-11-25T02:45:01ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032018-01-01134e019600110.1371/journal.pone.0196001Factors associated with visual field defects of optic disc drusen.Kyoung Min LeeSe Joon WooJeong-Min HwangTo investigate the prevalence and risk factors for visual field defect in patients with optic disc drusen (ODD).We assessed the visual field status of patients with ODD whose diagnosis were confirmed by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). Visual field defects were classified as normal, enlarged blind spot, or other defects. ODD were classified into either type 1 (without hyperreflective border and heterogenic internal reflectance) or type 2 (with hyperreflective border and lower internal reflectance). The prevalence and risk factors for each visual field defect was analyzed using logistic regression analysis and classification and regression tree (CART) modeling.Of the 40 eyes with ODD, 33 (83%) eyes were categorized as type 1 and 7 (17%) eyes were categorized as type 2 ODD. Regarding the visual field defects, 19 (48%) eyes showed normal visual field, 11 (28%) eyes showed enlarged blind spot, and 9 (24%) eyes showed other defects. The latter was more frequent in type 2 ODD (P = 0.001). Logistic regression analysis revealed that the factor associated with other defects was the thinning of the average retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) (per 10 μm decrease, OR = 3.436, P = 0.004), and the factor associated with enlarged blind spot was the height of ODD (per 100 μm increase, OR = 3.956, P = 0.023). CART modeling revealed that the average RNFL thickness lesser than 85.5 μm, and then the ODD height larger than 348 μm were the best split-up factors for predicting the type of visual field defects.In this study, one-quarter of ODD patients showed abnormal visual field defect other than enlarged blind spot. These other visual field defects appeared to be associated with the axonal loss in the eyes with type 2 ODD.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5927402?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kyoung Min Lee
Se Joon Woo
Jeong-Min Hwang
spellingShingle Kyoung Min Lee
Se Joon Woo
Jeong-Min Hwang
Factors associated with visual field defects of optic disc drusen.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Kyoung Min Lee
Se Joon Woo
Jeong-Min Hwang
author_sort Kyoung Min Lee
title Factors associated with visual field defects of optic disc drusen.
title_short Factors associated with visual field defects of optic disc drusen.
title_full Factors associated with visual field defects of optic disc drusen.
title_fullStr Factors associated with visual field defects of optic disc drusen.
title_full_unstemmed Factors associated with visual field defects of optic disc drusen.
title_sort factors associated with visual field defects of optic disc drusen.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2018-01-01
description To investigate the prevalence and risk factors for visual field defect in patients with optic disc drusen (ODD).We assessed the visual field status of patients with ODD whose diagnosis were confirmed by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). Visual field defects were classified as normal, enlarged blind spot, or other defects. ODD were classified into either type 1 (without hyperreflective border and heterogenic internal reflectance) or type 2 (with hyperreflective border and lower internal reflectance). The prevalence and risk factors for each visual field defect was analyzed using logistic regression analysis and classification and regression tree (CART) modeling.Of the 40 eyes with ODD, 33 (83%) eyes were categorized as type 1 and 7 (17%) eyes were categorized as type 2 ODD. Regarding the visual field defects, 19 (48%) eyes showed normal visual field, 11 (28%) eyes showed enlarged blind spot, and 9 (24%) eyes showed other defects. The latter was more frequent in type 2 ODD (P = 0.001). Logistic regression analysis revealed that the factor associated with other defects was the thinning of the average retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) (per 10 μm decrease, OR = 3.436, P = 0.004), and the factor associated with enlarged blind spot was the height of ODD (per 100 μm increase, OR = 3.956, P = 0.023). CART modeling revealed that the average RNFL thickness lesser than 85.5 μm, and then the ODD height larger than 348 μm were the best split-up factors for predicting the type of visual field defects.In this study, one-quarter of ODD patients showed abnormal visual field defect other than enlarged blind spot. These other visual field defects appeared to be associated with the axonal loss in the eyes with type 2 ODD.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5927402?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT kyoungminlee factorsassociatedwithvisualfielddefectsofopticdiscdrusen
AT sejoonwoo factorsassociatedwithvisualfielddefectsofopticdiscdrusen
AT jeongminhwang factorsassociatedwithvisualfielddefectsofopticdiscdrusen
_version_ 1724764652169068544