Separating drought effects from roof artifacts on ecosystem processes in a grassland drought experiment.

1: Given the predictions of increased drought probabilities under various climate change scenarios, there have been numerous experimental field studies simulating drought using transparent roofs in different ecosystems and regions. Such roofs may, however, have unknown side effects, called artifacts...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anja Vogel, Thomas Fester, Nico Eisenhauer, Michael Scherer-Lorenzen, Bernhard Schmid, Wolfgang W Weisser, Alexandra Weigelt
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2013-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3731277?pdf=render
id doaj-e730772c2c9f40b7a3582350af91ab24
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e730772c2c9f40b7a3582350af91ab242020-11-25T01:19:30ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032013-01-0188e7099710.1371/journal.pone.0070997Separating drought effects from roof artifacts on ecosystem processes in a grassland drought experiment.Anja VogelThomas FesterNico EisenhauerMichael Scherer-LorenzenBernhard SchmidWolfgang W WeisserAlexandra Weigelt1: Given the predictions of increased drought probabilities under various climate change scenarios, there have been numerous experimental field studies simulating drought using transparent roofs in different ecosystems and regions. Such roofs may, however, have unknown side effects, called artifacts, on the measured variables potentially confounding the experimental results. A roofed control allows the quantification of potential artifacts, which is lacking in most experiments. 2: We conducted a drought experiment in experimental grasslands to study artifacts of transparent roofs and the resulting effects of artifacts on ecosystems relative to drought on three response variables (aboveground biomass, litter decomposition and plant metabolite profiles). We established three drought treatments, using (1) transparent roofs to exclude rainfall, (2) an unroofed control treatment receiving natural rainfall and (3) a roofed control, nested in the drought treatment but with rain water reapplied according to ambient conditions. 3: Roofs had a slight impact on air (+0.14°C during night) and soil temperatures (-0.45°C on warm days, +0.25°C on cold nights), while photosynthetically active radiation was decreased significantly (-16%). Aboveground plant community biomass was reduced in the drought treatment (-41%), but there was no significant difference between the roofed and unroofed control, i.e., there were no measurable roof artifact effects. 4: Compared to the unroofed control, litter decomposition was decreased significantly both in the drought treatment (-26%) and in the roofed control treatment (-18%), suggesting artifact effects of the transparent roofs. Moreover, aboveground metabolite profiles in the model plant species Medicago x varia were different from the unroofed control in both the drought and roofed control treatments, and roof artifact effects were of comparable magnitude as drought effects. 5: Our results stress the need for roofed control treatments when using transparent roofs for studying drought effects, because roofs can cause significant side effects.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3731277?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Anja Vogel
Thomas Fester
Nico Eisenhauer
Michael Scherer-Lorenzen
Bernhard Schmid
Wolfgang W Weisser
Alexandra Weigelt
spellingShingle Anja Vogel
Thomas Fester
Nico Eisenhauer
Michael Scherer-Lorenzen
Bernhard Schmid
Wolfgang W Weisser
Alexandra Weigelt
Separating drought effects from roof artifacts on ecosystem processes in a grassland drought experiment.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Anja Vogel
Thomas Fester
Nico Eisenhauer
Michael Scherer-Lorenzen
Bernhard Schmid
Wolfgang W Weisser
Alexandra Weigelt
author_sort Anja Vogel
title Separating drought effects from roof artifacts on ecosystem processes in a grassland drought experiment.
title_short Separating drought effects from roof artifacts on ecosystem processes in a grassland drought experiment.
title_full Separating drought effects from roof artifacts on ecosystem processes in a grassland drought experiment.
title_fullStr Separating drought effects from roof artifacts on ecosystem processes in a grassland drought experiment.
title_full_unstemmed Separating drought effects from roof artifacts on ecosystem processes in a grassland drought experiment.
title_sort separating drought effects from roof artifacts on ecosystem processes in a grassland drought experiment.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2013-01-01
description 1: Given the predictions of increased drought probabilities under various climate change scenarios, there have been numerous experimental field studies simulating drought using transparent roofs in different ecosystems and regions. Such roofs may, however, have unknown side effects, called artifacts, on the measured variables potentially confounding the experimental results. A roofed control allows the quantification of potential artifacts, which is lacking in most experiments. 2: We conducted a drought experiment in experimental grasslands to study artifacts of transparent roofs and the resulting effects of artifacts on ecosystems relative to drought on three response variables (aboveground biomass, litter decomposition and plant metabolite profiles). We established three drought treatments, using (1) transparent roofs to exclude rainfall, (2) an unroofed control treatment receiving natural rainfall and (3) a roofed control, nested in the drought treatment but with rain water reapplied according to ambient conditions. 3: Roofs had a slight impact on air (+0.14°C during night) and soil temperatures (-0.45°C on warm days, +0.25°C on cold nights), while photosynthetically active radiation was decreased significantly (-16%). Aboveground plant community biomass was reduced in the drought treatment (-41%), but there was no significant difference between the roofed and unroofed control, i.e., there were no measurable roof artifact effects. 4: Compared to the unroofed control, litter decomposition was decreased significantly both in the drought treatment (-26%) and in the roofed control treatment (-18%), suggesting artifact effects of the transparent roofs. Moreover, aboveground metabolite profiles in the model plant species Medicago x varia were different from the unroofed control in both the drought and roofed control treatments, and roof artifact effects were of comparable magnitude as drought effects. 5: Our results stress the need for roofed control treatments when using transparent roofs for studying drought effects, because roofs can cause significant side effects.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3731277?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT anjavogel separatingdroughteffectsfromroofartifactsonecosystemprocessesinagrasslanddroughtexperiment
AT thomasfester separatingdroughteffectsfromroofartifactsonecosystemprocessesinagrasslanddroughtexperiment
AT nicoeisenhauer separatingdroughteffectsfromroofartifactsonecosystemprocessesinagrasslanddroughtexperiment
AT michaelschererlorenzen separatingdroughteffectsfromroofartifactsonecosystemprocessesinagrasslanddroughtexperiment
AT bernhardschmid separatingdroughteffectsfromroofartifactsonecosystemprocessesinagrasslanddroughtexperiment
AT wolfgangwweisser separatingdroughteffectsfromroofartifactsonecosystemprocessesinagrasslanddroughtexperiment
AT alexandraweigelt separatingdroughteffectsfromroofartifactsonecosystemprocessesinagrasslanddroughtexperiment
_version_ 1725137941940928512