A Postcolonial Reading on Eurocentrism, Otherization and Orientalist Discourse in Sociological Thought and Its Criticism

Modernity has long been a dominant paradigm in producing knowledge and in determining theoretical framework of the disciplines although it is in connivance with a Eurocentric ideology and conflict of paradoxes in itself. The other participant of the crime, committed with Eurocentric ideology, is soc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: İrfan Kaya
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: ULUM: Journal of Religious Inquiries 2018-07-01
Series:ULUM
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/ulum/issue/38422/449852?publisher=abdullah-demir
id doaj-e721865f7d8240a4a4ba17fedf20fdab
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e721865f7d8240a4a4ba17fedf20fdab2020-11-24T21:56:43ZengULUM: Journal of Religious InquiriesULUM2645-91322018-07-011116318810.5281/zenodo.1488711960A Postcolonial Reading on Eurocentrism, Otherization and Orientalist Discourse in Sociological Thought and Its Criticismİrfan Kaya0CUMHURIYET UNIVERSITYModernity has long been a dominant paradigm in producing knowledge and in determining theoretical framework of the disciplines although it is in connivance with a Eurocentric ideology and conflict of paradoxes in itself. The other participant of the crime, committed with Eurocentric ideology, is sociology as an observation method of modernity’s self and developed with it. They also display a tautological view with each other. Compatibility of paradoxes in modernity makes the othering notions of rejection, negation etc. inevitable. Otherization in sociological literature has been a reference point in historiography that is developed with the claim that historical process experienced throughout Europe is the only straight and universal one with an essentialist perspective, in the Orientalist discourse that is established in parallelism with colonial activities and generating ideal tips. This article aims to criticize the framework and the narrative in modernity and sociology as they contain Eurocentric discourse according to post-colonial theory. While chasing a non-othering paradigm inquiring troubles and dilemmas that post-colonial theory faced will also be the other aim of this study. This paper aims to be authentic by determining the problems of post-colonial theory that criticizes the dominant paradigm through orientalist discourse yet falls into clutches of self-orientalism.https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/ulum/issue/38422/449852?publisher=abdullah-demirDin SosyolojisiOryantalizmAvrupa-merkezcilikÖtekileştirmeKültürelcilikPost-kolonyalizmSociology of ReligionOrientalismEuro-centrismOtherizationCulturalismPost-colonialism
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author İrfan Kaya
spellingShingle İrfan Kaya
A Postcolonial Reading on Eurocentrism, Otherization and Orientalist Discourse in Sociological Thought and Its Criticism
ULUM
Din Sosyolojisi
Oryantalizm
Avrupa-merkezcilik
Ötekileştirme
Kültürelcilik
Post-kolonyalizm
Sociology of Religion
Orientalism
Euro-centrism
Otherization
Culturalism
Post-colonialism
author_facet İrfan Kaya
author_sort İrfan Kaya
title A Postcolonial Reading on Eurocentrism, Otherization and Orientalist Discourse in Sociological Thought and Its Criticism
title_short A Postcolonial Reading on Eurocentrism, Otherization and Orientalist Discourse in Sociological Thought and Its Criticism
title_full A Postcolonial Reading on Eurocentrism, Otherization and Orientalist Discourse in Sociological Thought and Its Criticism
title_fullStr A Postcolonial Reading on Eurocentrism, Otherization and Orientalist Discourse in Sociological Thought and Its Criticism
title_full_unstemmed A Postcolonial Reading on Eurocentrism, Otherization and Orientalist Discourse in Sociological Thought and Its Criticism
title_sort postcolonial reading on eurocentrism, otherization and orientalist discourse in sociological thought and its criticism
publisher ULUM: Journal of Religious Inquiries
series ULUM
issn 2645-9132
publishDate 2018-07-01
description Modernity has long been a dominant paradigm in producing knowledge and in determining theoretical framework of the disciplines although it is in connivance with a Eurocentric ideology and conflict of paradoxes in itself. The other participant of the crime, committed with Eurocentric ideology, is sociology as an observation method of modernity’s self and developed with it. They also display a tautological view with each other. Compatibility of paradoxes in modernity makes the othering notions of rejection, negation etc. inevitable. Otherization in sociological literature has been a reference point in historiography that is developed with the claim that historical process experienced throughout Europe is the only straight and universal one with an essentialist perspective, in the Orientalist discourse that is established in parallelism with colonial activities and generating ideal tips. This article aims to criticize the framework and the narrative in modernity and sociology as they contain Eurocentric discourse according to post-colonial theory. While chasing a non-othering paradigm inquiring troubles and dilemmas that post-colonial theory faced will also be the other aim of this study. This paper aims to be authentic by determining the problems of post-colonial theory that criticizes the dominant paradigm through orientalist discourse yet falls into clutches of self-orientalism.
topic Din Sosyolojisi
Oryantalizm
Avrupa-merkezcilik
Ötekileştirme
Kültürelcilik
Post-kolonyalizm
Sociology of Religion
Orientalism
Euro-centrism
Otherization
Culturalism
Post-colonialism
url https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/ulum/issue/38422/449852?publisher=abdullah-demir
work_keys_str_mv AT irfankaya apostcolonialreadingoneurocentrismotherizationandorientalistdiscourseinsociologicalthoughtanditscriticism
AT irfankaya postcolonialreadingoneurocentrismotherizationandorientalistdiscourseinsociologicalthoughtanditscriticism
_version_ 1725857559164747776