Rethinking the correction for absorbing aerosols in the OMI- and TROPOMI-like surface UV algorithms
<p>Satellite estimates of surface UV irradiance have been available since 1978 from the TOMS UV spectrometer and have continued with significantly improved ground resolution using the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI 2004–current) and Sentinel 5 Precursor (S5P 2017–current). The surface UV ret...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Copernicus Publications
2021-07-01
|
Series: | Atmospheric Measurement Techniques |
Online Access: | https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/14/4947/2021/amt-14-4947-2021.pdf |
Summary: | <p>Satellite estimates of surface UV irradiance have been available since 1978 from the TOMS UV spectrometer and have continued with
significantly improved ground resolution using the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI 2004–current) and Sentinel 5 Precursor
(S5P 2017–current). The surface UV retrieval algorithm remains essentially the same: it first estimates the clear-sky UV
irradiance based on measured ozone and then accounts for the attenuation by clouds and aerosols, applying two consecutive
correction factors. When estimating the total aerosol effect in surface UV irradiance, there are two major classes of
aerosols to be considered: (1) aerosols that only scatter UV radiation and (2) aerosols that both scatter and absorb UV
radiation. The former effect is implicitly included in the measured effective Lambertian-equivalent scene reflectivity (LER),
so the scattering aerosol influence is estimated through cloud correction factor. Aerosols that absorb UV radiation attenuate
the surface UV radiation more strongly than non-absorbing aerosols of the same extinction optical depth. Moreover, since
these aerosols also attenuate the outgoing satellite-measured radiance, the cloud correction factor that treats these aerosols
as purely scattering underestimates their aerosol optical depth (AOD), causing underestimation of LER and overestimation of surface UV
irradiance. Therefore, for correction of aerosol absorption, additional information is needed, such as a model-based monthly
climatology of aerosol absorption optical depth (AAOD). A correction for
absorbing aerosols was proposed almost a decade ago and later implemented in the operational OMI and TROPOMI UV algorithms.
In this study, however, we show that there is still room for improvement to better account for the solar zenith angle (SZA)
dependence and nonlinearity in the absorbing aerosol attenuation, and as a result we propose an improved correction scheme.
There are two main differences between the new proposed correction and the one that is currently operational in OMI and TROPOMI
UV algorithms. First, the currently operational correction for absorbing aerosols is a function of AAOD only, while the new correction additionally
takes the solar zenith angle dependence into account. Second, the second-order polynomial of the new correction takes the nonlinearity in the correction as a function of AAOD
better into account, if compared to the currently operational one, and
thus better describes the effect by absorbing aerosols over a larger range of AAOD.
To illustrate the potential impact of the new correction in the global UV estimates, we applied the current and new proposed
correction for global fields of AAOD from the aerosol climatology currently used in OMI UV algorithm, showing a typical
differences of <span class="inline-formula">±</span>5 %. This new correction is easy to implement operationally using information of solar zenith angle and
existing AAOD climatology.</p> |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1867-1381 1867-8548 |