FLASH Proton Pencil Beam Scanning Irradiation Minimizes Radiation-Induced Leg Contracture and Skin Toxicity in Mice

Ultra-high dose rate radiation has been reported to produce a more favorable toxicity and tumor control profile compared to conventional dose rates that are used for patient treatment. So far, the so-called FLASH effect has been validated for electron, photon and scattered proton beam, but not yet f...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shannon Cunningham, Shelby McCauley, Kanimozhi Vairamani, Joseph Speth, Swati Girdhani, Eric Abel, Ricky A. Sharma, John P. Perentesis, Susanne I. Wells, Anthony Mascia, Mathieu Sertorio
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-03-01
Series:Cancers
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/13/5/1012
id doaj-e714735345c14fe28137c59a8df588ee
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e714735345c14fe28137c59a8df588ee2021-03-02T00:00:44ZengMDPI AGCancers2072-66942021-03-01131012101210.3390/cancers13051012FLASH Proton Pencil Beam Scanning Irradiation Minimizes Radiation-Induced Leg Contracture and Skin Toxicity in MiceShannon Cunningham0Shelby McCauley1Kanimozhi Vairamani2Joseph Speth3Swati Girdhani4Eric Abel5Ricky A. Sharma6John P. Perentesis7Susanne I. Wells8Anthony Mascia9Mathieu Sertorio10Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Division of Oncology, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USACincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Division of Oncology, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USACincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Division of Oncology, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USADepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USAVarian Medical Systems, Inc., Palo Alto, CA 94304, USAVarian Medical Systems, Inc., Palo Alto, CA 94304, USAVarian Medical Systems, Inc., Palo Alto, CA 94304, USACincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Division of Oncology, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USACincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Division of Oncology, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USADepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USACincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Division of Oncology, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USAUltra-high dose rate radiation has been reported to produce a more favorable toxicity and tumor control profile compared to conventional dose rates that are used for patient treatment. So far, the so-called FLASH effect has been validated for electron, photon and scattered proton beam, but not yet for proton pencil beam scanning (PBS). Because PBS is the state-of-the-art delivery modality for proton therapy and constitutes a wide and growing installation base, we determined the benefit of FLASH PBS on skin and soft tissue toxicity. Using a pencil beam scanning nozzle and the plateau region of a 250 MeV proton beam, a uniform physical dose of 35 Gy (toxicity study) or 15 Gy (tumor control study) was delivered to the right hind leg of mice at various dose rates: Sham, Conventional (Conv, 1 Gy/s), Flash60 (57 Gy/s) and Flash115 (115 Gy/s). Acute radiation effects were quantified by measurements of plasma and skin levels of TGF-β1 and skin toxicity scoring. Delayed irradiation response was defined by hind leg contracture as a surrogate of irradiation-induced skin and soft tissue toxicity and by plasma levels of 13 different cytokines (CXCL1, CXCL10, Eotaxin, IL1-beta, IL-6, MCP-1, Mip1alpha, TNF-alpha, TNF-beta, VEGF, G-CSF, GM-CSF and TGF- β1). Plasma and skin levels of TGF-β1, skin toxicity and leg contracture were all significantly decreased in FLASH compared to Conv groups of mice. FLASH and Conv PBS had similar efficacy with regards to growth control of MOC1 and MOC2 head and neck cancer cells transplanted into syngeneic, immunocompetent mice. These results demonstrate consistent delivery of FLASH PBS radiation from 1 to 115 Gy/s in a clinical gantry. Radiation response following delivery of 35 Gy indicates potential benefits of FLASH versus conventional PBS that are related to skin and soft tissue toxicity.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/13/5/1012FLASHultra-high dose rateproton therapyproton beam scanningskin and soft tissuenormal tissue toxicity
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Shannon Cunningham
Shelby McCauley
Kanimozhi Vairamani
Joseph Speth
Swati Girdhani
Eric Abel
Ricky A. Sharma
John P. Perentesis
Susanne I. Wells
Anthony Mascia
Mathieu Sertorio
spellingShingle Shannon Cunningham
Shelby McCauley
Kanimozhi Vairamani
Joseph Speth
Swati Girdhani
Eric Abel
Ricky A. Sharma
John P. Perentesis
Susanne I. Wells
Anthony Mascia
Mathieu Sertorio
FLASH Proton Pencil Beam Scanning Irradiation Minimizes Radiation-Induced Leg Contracture and Skin Toxicity in Mice
Cancers
FLASH
ultra-high dose rate
proton therapy
proton beam scanning
skin and soft tissue
normal tissue toxicity
author_facet Shannon Cunningham
Shelby McCauley
Kanimozhi Vairamani
Joseph Speth
Swati Girdhani
Eric Abel
Ricky A. Sharma
John P. Perentesis
Susanne I. Wells
Anthony Mascia
Mathieu Sertorio
author_sort Shannon Cunningham
title FLASH Proton Pencil Beam Scanning Irradiation Minimizes Radiation-Induced Leg Contracture and Skin Toxicity in Mice
title_short FLASH Proton Pencil Beam Scanning Irradiation Minimizes Radiation-Induced Leg Contracture and Skin Toxicity in Mice
title_full FLASH Proton Pencil Beam Scanning Irradiation Minimizes Radiation-Induced Leg Contracture and Skin Toxicity in Mice
title_fullStr FLASH Proton Pencil Beam Scanning Irradiation Minimizes Radiation-Induced Leg Contracture and Skin Toxicity in Mice
title_full_unstemmed FLASH Proton Pencil Beam Scanning Irradiation Minimizes Radiation-Induced Leg Contracture and Skin Toxicity in Mice
title_sort flash proton pencil beam scanning irradiation minimizes radiation-induced leg contracture and skin toxicity in mice
publisher MDPI AG
series Cancers
issn 2072-6694
publishDate 2021-03-01
description Ultra-high dose rate radiation has been reported to produce a more favorable toxicity and tumor control profile compared to conventional dose rates that are used for patient treatment. So far, the so-called FLASH effect has been validated for electron, photon and scattered proton beam, but not yet for proton pencil beam scanning (PBS). Because PBS is the state-of-the-art delivery modality for proton therapy and constitutes a wide and growing installation base, we determined the benefit of FLASH PBS on skin and soft tissue toxicity. Using a pencil beam scanning nozzle and the plateau region of a 250 MeV proton beam, a uniform physical dose of 35 Gy (toxicity study) or 15 Gy (tumor control study) was delivered to the right hind leg of mice at various dose rates: Sham, Conventional (Conv, 1 Gy/s), Flash60 (57 Gy/s) and Flash115 (115 Gy/s). Acute radiation effects were quantified by measurements of plasma and skin levels of TGF-β1 and skin toxicity scoring. Delayed irradiation response was defined by hind leg contracture as a surrogate of irradiation-induced skin and soft tissue toxicity and by plasma levels of 13 different cytokines (CXCL1, CXCL10, Eotaxin, IL1-beta, IL-6, MCP-1, Mip1alpha, TNF-alpha, TNF-beta, VEGF, G-CSF, GM-CSF and TGF- β1). Plasma and skin levels of TGF-β1, skin toxicity and leg contracture were all significantly decreased in FLASH compared to Conv groups of mice. FLASH and Conv PBS had similar efficacy with regards to growth control of MOC1 and MOC2 head and neck cancer cells transplanted into syngeneic, immunocompetent mice. These results demonstrate consistent delivery of FLASH PBS radiation from 1 to 115 Gy/s in a clinical gantry. Radiation response following delivery of 35 Gy indicates potential benefits of FLASH versus conventional PBS that are related to skin and soft tissue toxicity.
topic FLASH
ultra-high dose rate
proton therapy
proton beam scanning
skin and soft tissue
normal tissue toxicity
url https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/13/5/1012
work_keys_str_mv AT shannoncunningham flashprotonpencilbeamscanningirradiationminimizesradiationinducedlegcontractureandskintoxicityinmice
AT shelbymccauley flashprotonpencilbeamscanningirradiationminimizesradiationinducedlegcontractureandskintoxicityinmice
AT kanimozhivairamani flashprotonpencilbeamscanningirradiationminimizesradiationinducedlegcontractureandskintoxicityinmice
AT josephspeth flashprotonpencilbeamscanningirradiationminimizesradiationinducedlegcontractureandskintoxicityinmice
AT swatigirdhani flashprotonpencilbeamscanningirradiationminimizesradiationinducedlegcontractureandskintoxicityinmice
AT ericabel flashprotonpencilbeamscanningirradiationminimizesradiationinducedlegcontractureandskintoxicityinmice
AT rickyasharma flashprotonpencilbeamscanningirradiationminimizesradiationinducedlegcontractureandskintoxicityinmice
AT johnpperentesis flashprotonpencilbeamscanningirradiationminimizesradiationinducedlegcontractureandskintoxicityinmice
AT susanneiwells flashprotonpencilbeamscanningirradiationminimizesradiationinducedlegcontractureandskintoxicityinmice
AT anthonymascia flashprotonpencilbeamscanningirradiationminimizesradiationinducedlegcontractureandskintoxicityinmice
AT mathieusertorio flashprotonpencilbeamscanningirradiationminimizesradiationinducedlegcontractureandskintoxicityinmice
_version_ 1724245730586001408