Appraising the European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer: what do the results mean?

The value of screening for prostate cancer has been a contentious issue within the medical literature for several decades. At the crux of the matter lies a judgment call of whether the potential benefits of screening, a reduction in prostate cancer and all-cause mortality, outweigh the limitations,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Dragan Ilic
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2015-04-01
Series:Asian Journal of Andrology
Online Access:http://www.ajandrology.com/article.asp?issn=1008-682X;year=2015;volume=17;issue=2;spage=221;epage=222;aulast=Ilic
id doaj-e7090eddb21d494586a94f26b447ef50
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e7090eddb21d494586a94f26b447ef502020-11-24T23:37:21ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsAsian Journal of Andrology1008-682X1745-72622015-04-0117222122210.4103/1008-682X.142131Appraising the European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer: what do the results mean? Dragan IlicThe value of screening for prostate cancer has been a contentious issue within the medical literature for several decades. At the crux of the matter lies a judgment call of whether the potential benefits of screening, a reduction in prostate cancer and all-cause mortality, outweigh the limitations, overdiagnosis and overtreatment. The study by Schrφder et al. reports 9, 11 and 13-year follow-up data on men participating in the European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer (ERSPC). While the authors report a significant reduction in prostate cancer mortality, they conclude that potential harms associated with screening currently circumvent any recommendation for a population-based approach to screening for prostate cancer.http://www.ajandrology.com/article.asp?issn=1008-682X;year=2015;volume=17;issue=2;spage=221;epage=222;aulast=Ilic
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Dragan Ilic
spellingShingle Dragan Ilic
Appraising the European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer: what do the results mean?
Asian Journal of Andrology
author_facet Dragan Ilic
author_sort Dragan Ilic
title Appraising the European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer: what do the results mean?
title_short Appraising the European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer: what do the results mean?
title_full Appraising the European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer: what do the results mean?
title_fullStr Appraising the European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer: what do the results mean?
title_full_unstemmed Appraising the European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer: what do the results mean?
title_sort appraising the european randomized study of screening for prostate cancer: what do the results mean?
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Asian Journal of Andrology
issn 1008-682X
1745-7262
publishDate 2015-04-01
description The value of screening for prostate cancer has been a contentious issue within the medical literature for several decades. At the crux of the matter lies a judgment call of whether the potential benefits of screening, a reduction in prostate cancer and all-cause mortality, outweigh the limitations, overdiagnosis and overtreatment. The study by Schrφder et al. reports 9, 11 and 13-year follow-up data on men participating in the European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer (ERSPC). While the authors report a significant reduction in prostate cancer mortality, they conclude that potential harms associated with screening currently circumvent any recommendation for a population-based approach to screening for prostate cancer.
url http://www.ajandrology.com/article.asp?issn=1008-682X;year=2015;volume=17;issue=2;spage=221;epage=222;aulast=Ilic
work_keys_str_mv AT draganilic appraisingtheeuropeanrandomizedstudyofscreeningforprostatecancerwhatdotheresultsmean
_version_ 1725520317362733056