Multiplicity within Singularity: Racial Categorization and Recognizing “Mixed Race” in Singapore

“Race” and racial categories play a significant role in everyday life and state organization in Singapore. While multiplicity and diversity are important characteristics of Singaporean society, Singapore's multiracial ideology is firmly based on separate, racialized groups, leaving little room...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Zarine L. Rocha
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2011-09-01
Series:Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/186810341103000304
id doaj-e6f73e3b98cd4b68a0236d1921b0ef38
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e6f73e3b98cd4b68a0236d1921b0ef382020-11-25T03:03:54ZengSAGE PublishingJournal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs1868-10341868-48822011-09-013010.1177/186810341103000304Multiplicity within Singularity: Racial Categorization and Recognizing “Mixed Race” in SingaporeZarine L. Rocha0Department of Sociology at the National University of Singapore.“Race” and racial categories play a significant role in everyday life and state organization in Singapore. While multiplicity and diversity are important characteristics of Singaporean society, Singapore's multiracial ideology is firmly based on separate, racialized groups, leaving little room for racial projects reflecting more complex identifications. This article explores national narratives of race, culture and belonging as they have developed over time, used as a tool for the state, and re-emerging in discourses of hybridity and “double-barrelled” racial identifications. Multiracialism, as a maintained structural feature of Singaporean society, is both challenged and reinforced by new understandings of hybridity and older conceptions of what it means to be “mixed race” in a (post-)colonial society. Tracing the temporal thread of racial categorization through a lens of mixedness, this article places the Singaporean case within emerging work on hybridity and recognition of “mixed race”. It illustrates how state-led understandings of race and “mixed race” describe processes of both continuity and change, with far-reaching practical and ideological impacts.https://doi.org/10.1177/186810341103000304
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Zarine L. Rocha
spellingShingle Zarine L. Rocha
Multiplicity within Singularity: Racial Categorization and Recognizing “Mixed Race” in Singapore
Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs
author_facet Zarine L. Rocha
author_sort Zarine L. Rocha
title Multiplicity within Singularity: Racial Categorization and Recognizing “Mixed Race” in Singapore
title_short Multiplicity within Singularity: Racial Categorization and Recognizing “Mixed Race” in Singapore
title_full Multiplicity within Singularity: Racial Categorization and Recognizing “Mixed Race” in Singapore
title_fullStr Multiplicity within Singularity: Racial Categorization and Recognizing “Mixed Race” in Singapore
title_full_unstemmed Multiplicity within Singularity: Racial Categorization and Recognizing “Mixed Race” in Singapore
title_sort multiplicity within singularity: racial categorization and recognizing “mixed race” in singapore
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs
issn 1868-1034
1868-4882
publishDate 2011-09-01
description “Race” and racial categories play a significant role in everyday life and state organization in Singapore. While multiplicity and diversity are important characteristics of Singaporean society, Singapore's multiracial ideology is firmly based on separate, racialized groups, leaving little room for racial projects reflecting more complex identifications. This article explores national narratives of race, culture and belonging as they have developed over time, used as a tool for the state, and re-emerging in discourses of hybridity and “double-barrelled” racial identifications. Multiracialism, as a maintained structural feature of Singaporean society, is both challenged and reinforced by new understandings of hybridity and older conceptions of what it means to be “mixed race” in a (post-)colonial society. Tracing the temporal thread of racial categorization through a lens of mixedness, this article places the Singaporean case within emerging work on hybridity and recognition of “mixed race”. It illustrates how state-led understandings of race and “mixed race” describe processes of both continuity and change, with far-reaching practical and ideological impacts.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/186810341103000304
work_keys_str_mv AT zarinelrocha multiplicitywithinsingularityracialcategorizationandrecognizingmixedraceinsingapore
_version_ 1724684034397700096