BUDAYA NASIONAL DI TENGAH PASAR: KONSTRUKSI, DEKONSTRUKSI, DAN REKONSTRUKSI

In the Reformation period, the state regime still mobilizes traditional-ideal values as national culture without giving conceptual and operational explanations. In this article, I combine two approaches, cultural studies and postcolonial studies, for reading national culture as represented in some P...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ikwan Setiawan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universitas Gadjah Mada 2012-04-01
Series:Jurnal Kawistara
Subjects:
Online Access:https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/kawistara/article/view/3952
id doaj-e6f235b0e51249998ebef489fb0bb0c9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e6f235b0e51249998ebef489fb0bb0c92020-11-24T20:41:25ZengUniversitas Gadjah MadaJurnal Kawistara2088-54152355-57772012-04-012110.22146/kawistara.39523476BUDAYA NASIONAL DI TENGAH PASAR: KONSTRUKSI, DEKONSTRUKSI, DAN REKONSTRUKSIIkwan Setiawan0Jurusan Sastra Inggris Universitas Jember Jawa TimurIn the Reformation period, the state regime still mobilizes traditional-ideal values as national culture without giving conceptual and operational explanations. In this article, I combine two approaches, cultural studies and postcolonial studies, for reading national culture as represented in some President Soesilo Bambang Yudhoyono’s presidential speeches. I will analyze ideal-but-ambivalent constructions of national culture in regime’s perspective as represented in those speeches, particularly, in the context of continuous of national culture in regime’s perspective in those speeches, particularly, in the context of the government’s continuous mobilization of traditional meanings as the invisible power for Indonesian people, while, at the same time,placing emphasis on economic progress.Instead of a strategic cultural construction, national culture produces its own deconstruction and fails to be discursive formation. Further, I argue that the regime operates their governmentality by reconstructing newer national culture based on market economics as discursive constructions, which ideally can provide conceptual and material basis for state regime in conducting governance and for citizens in achieving welfare in neoliberal formation.https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/kawistara/article/view/3952National Culture, Regime’s Perspective, Construction, Deconstruction, Reconstruction, Neoliberalism.
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ikwan Setiawan
spellingShingle Ikwan Setiawan
BUDAYA NASIONAL DI TENGAH PASAR: KONSTRUKSI, DEKONSTRUKSI, DAN REKONSTRUKSI
Jurnal Kawistara
National Culture, Regime’s Perspective, Construction, Deconstruction, Reconstruction, Neoliberalism.
author_facet Ikwan Setiawan
author_sort Ikwan Setiawan
title BUDAYA NASIONAL DI TENGAH PASAR: KONSTRUKSI, DEKONSTRUKSI, DAN REKONSTRUKSI
title_short BUDAYA NASIONAL DI TENGAH PASAR: KONSTRUKSI, DEKONSTRUKSI, DAN REKONSTRUKSI
title_full BUDAYA NASIONAL DI TENGAH PASAR: KONSTRUKSI, DEKONSTRUKSI, DAN REKONSTRUKSI
title_fullStr BUDAYA NASIONAL DI TENGAH PASAR: KONSTRUKSI, DEKONSTRUKSI, DAN REKONSTRUKSI
title_full_unstemmed BUDAYA NASIONAL DI TENGAH PASAR: KONSTRUKSI, DEKONSTRUKSI, DAN REKONSTRUKSI
title_sort budaya nasional di tengah pasar: konstruksi, dekonstruksi, dan rekonstruksi
publisher Universitas Gadjah Mada
series Jurnal Kawistara
issn 2088-5415
2355-5777
publishDate 2012-04-01
description In the Reformation period, the state regime still mobilizes traditional-ideal values as national culture without giving conceptual and operational explanations. In this article, I combine two approaches, cultural studies and postcolonial studies, for reading national culture as represented in some President Soesilo Bambang Yudhoyono’s presidential speeches. I will analyze ideal-but-ambivalent constructions of national culture in regime’s perspective as represented in those speeches, particularly, in the context of continuous of national culture in regime’s perspective in those speeches, particularly, in the context of the government’s continuous mobilization of traditional meanings as the invisible power for Indonesian people, while, at the same time,placing emphasis on economic progress.Instead of a strategic cultural construction, national culture produces its own deconstruction and fails to be discursive formation. Further, I argue that the regime operates their governmentality by reconstructing newer national culture based on market economics as discursive constructions, which ideally can provide conceptual and material basis for state regime in conducting governance and for citizens in achieving welfare in neoliberal formation.
topic National Culture, Regime’s Perspective, Construction, Deconstruction, Reconstruction, Neoliberalism.
url https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/kawistara/article/view/3952
work_keys_str_mv AT ikwansetiawan budayanasionalditengahpasarkonstruksidekonstruksidanrekonstruksi
_version_ 1716825181359439872