“Indirect” Information: The Debate on Testimony in Social Epistemology and Its Role in the Game of “Giving and Asking for Reasons”

We will sketch the debate on testimony in social epistemology by reference to the contemporary debate on reductionism/anti-reductionism, communitarian epistemology and inferentialism. Testimony is a fundamental source of knowledge we share and it is worthy to be considered in the ambit of a dialogic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Raffaela Giovagnoli
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-03-01
Series:Information
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2078-2489/10/3/101
id doaj-e6e6414e8816495486980625802e6d25
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e6e6414e8816495486980625802e6d252020-11-24T22:07:41ZengMDPI AGInformation2078-24892019-03-0110310110.3390/info10030101info10030101“Indirect” Information: The Debate on Testimony in Social Epistemology and Its Role in the Game of “Giving and Asking for Reasons”Raffaela Giovagnoli0Faculty of Philosophy, Pontifical Lateran University, Vatican City, 00120 Rome, ItalyWe will sketch the debate on testimony in social epistemology by reference to the contemporary debate on reductionism/anti-reductionism, communitarian epistemology and inferentialism. Testimony is a fundamental source of knowledge we share and it is worthy to be considered in the ambit of a dialogical perspective, which requires a description of a formal structure, which entails deontic statuses and deontic attitudes. In particular, we will argue for a social reformulation of the “space of reasons”, which establishes a fruitful relationship with the epistemological view of Wilfrid Sellars.http://www.mdpi.com/2078-2489/10/3/101testimonyjustificationcommitmententitlementspeech act
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Raffaela Giovagnoli
spellingShingle Raffaela Giovagnoli
“Indirect” Information: The Debate on Testimony in Social Epistemology and Its Role in the Game of “Giving and Asking for Reasons”
Information
testimony
justification
commitment
entitlement
speech act
author_facet Raffaela Giovagnoli
author_sort Raffaela Giovagnoli
title “Indirect” Information: The Debate on Testimony in Social Epistemology and Its Role in the Game of “Giving and Asking for Reasons”
title_short “Indirect” Information: The Debate on Testimony in Social Epistemology and Its Role in the Game of “Giving and Asking for Reasons”
title_full “Indirect” Information: The Debate on Testimony in Social Epistemology and Its Role in the Game of “Giving and Asking for Reasons”
title_fullStr “Indirect” Information: The Debate on Testimony in Social Epistemology and Its Role in the Game of “Giving and Asking for Reasons”
title_full_unstemmed “Indirect” Information: The Debate on Testimony in Social Epistemology and Its Role in the Game of “Giving and Asking for Reasons”
title_sort “indirect” information: the debate on testimony in social epistemology and its role in the game of “giving and asking for reasons”
publisher MDPI AG
series Information
issn 2078-2489
publishDate 2019-03-01
description We will sketch the debate on testimony in social epistemology by reference to the contemporary debate on reductionism/anti-reductionism, communitarian epistemology and inferentialism. Testimony is a fundamental source of knowledge we share and it is worthy to be considered in the ambit of a dialogical perspective, which requires a description of a formal structure, which entails deontic statuses and deontic attitudes. In particular, we will argue for a social reformulation of the “space of reasons”, which establishes a fruitful relationship with the epistemological view of Wilfrid Sellars.
topic testimony
justification
commitment
entitlement
speech act
url http://www.mdpi.com/2078-2489/10/3/101
work_keys_str_mv AT raffaelagiovagnoli indirectinformationthedebateontestimonyinsocialepistemologyanditsroleinthegameofgivingandaskingforreasons
_version_ 1725819131740028928