“Indirect” Information: The Debate on Testimony in Social Epistemology and Its Role in the Game of “Giving and Asking for Reasons”
We will sketch the debate on testimony in social epistemology by reference to the contemporary debate on reductionism/anti-reductionism, communitarian epistemology and inferentialism. Testimony is a fundamental source of knowledge we share and it is worthy to be considered in the ambit of a dialogic...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2019-03-01
|
Series: | Information |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.mdpi.com/2078-2489/10/3/101 |
id |
doaj-e6e6414e8816495486980625802e6d25 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-e6e6414e8816495486980625802e6d252020-11-24T22:07:41ZengMDPI AGInformation2078-24892019-03-0110310110.3390/info10030101info10030101“Indirect” Information: The Debate on Testimony in Social Epistemology and Its Role in the Game of “Giving and Asking for Reasons”Raffaela Giovagnoli0Faculty of Philosophy, Pontifical Lateran University, Vatican City, 00120 Rome, ItalyWe will sketch the debate on testimony in social epistemology by reference to the contemporary debate on reductionism/anti-reductionism, communitarian epistemology and inferentialism. Testimony is a fundamental source of knowledge we share and it is worthy to be considered in the ambit of a dialogical perspective, which requires a description of a formal structure, which entails deontic statuses and deontic attitudes. In particular, we will argue for a social reformulation of the “space of reasons”, which establishes a fruitful relationship with the epistemological view of Wilfrid Sellars.http://www.mdpi.com/2078-2489/10/3/101testimonyjustificationcommitmententitlementspeech act |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Raffaela Giovagnoli |
spellingShingle |
Raffaela Giovagnoli “Indirect” Information: The Debate on Testimony in Social Epistemology and Its Role in the Game of “Giving and Asking for Reasons” Information testimony justification commitment entitlement speech act |
author_facet |
Raffaela Giovagnoli |
author_sort |
Raffaela Giovagnoli |
title |
“Indirect” Information: The Debate on Testimony in Social Epistemology and Its Role in the Game of “Giving and Asking for Reasons” |
title_short |
“Indirect” Information: The Debate on Testimony in Social Epistemology and Its Role in the Game of “Giving and Asking for Reasons” |
title_full |
“Indirect” Information: The Debate on Testimony in Social Epistemology and Its Role in the Game of “Giving and Asking for Reasons” |
title_fullStr |
“Indirect” Information: The Debate on Testimony in Social Epistemology and Its Role in the Game of “Giving and Asking for Reasons” |
title_full_unstemmed |
“Indirect” Information: The Debate on Testimony in Social Epistemology and Its Role in the Game of “Giving and Asking for Reasons” |
title_sort |
“indirect” information: the debate on testimony in social epistemology and its role in the game of “giving and asking for reasons” |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Information |
issn |
2078-2489 |
publishDate |
2019-03-01 |
description |
We will sketch the debate on testimony in social epistemology by reference to the contemporary debate on reductionism/anti-reductionism, communitarian epistemology and inferentialism. Testimony is a fundamental source of knowledge we share and it is worthy to be considered in the ambit of a dialogical perspective, which requires a description of a formal structure, which entails deontic statuses and deontic attitudes. In particular, we will argue for a social reformulation of the “space of reasons”, which establishes a fruitful relationship with the epistemological view of Wilfrid Sellars. |
topic |
testimony justification commitment entitlement speech act |
url |
http://www.mdpi.com/2078-2489/10/3/101 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT raffaelagiovagnoli indirectinformationthedebateontestimonyinsocialepistemologyanditsroleinthegameofgivingandaskingforreasons |
_version_ |
1725819131740028928 |