Midwives’ experiences of performing maternal observations and escalating concerns: a focus group study

Abstract Background For the past decade, Maternal Mortality Reports, published in the United Kingdom every three years, have consistently raised concerns about maternal observations in maternity care. The reports identify that observations are not being done, not being completed fully, are not recor...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Justine Jeffery, Alistair Hewison, Laura Goodwin, Sara Kenyon
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2017-09-01
Series:BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12884-017-1472-8
id doaj-e6e5f3c34ecf4fe3a5b178575e6246d2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e6e5f3c34ecf4fe3a5b178575e6246d22020-11-24T20:56:25ZengBMCBMC Pregnancy and Childbirth1471-23932017-09-0117111110.1186/s12884-017-1472-8Midwives’ experiences of performing maternal observations and escalating concerns: a focus group studyJustine Jeffery0Alistair Hewison1Laura Goodwin2Sara Kenyon3Heart of England NHS Foundation TrustSchool of Nursing, Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of BirminghamPublic Health Institute of Applied Health Research, University of BirminghamPublic Health Institute of Applied Health Research, University of BirminghamAbstract Background For the past decade, Maternal Mortality Reports, published in the United Kingdom every three years, have consistently raised concerns about maternal observations in maternity care. The reports identify that observations are not being done, not being completed fully, are not recorded on Early Warning Score systems, and/or are not escalated appropriately. This has resulted in delays in referral, intervention and increases the risk of maternal morbidity or mortality. However there has been little exploration of the possible reasons for non-completion of maternal observations. Methods The aim of this study was to explore midwives’ experiences of performing maternal observations and escalating concerns in rural and urban maternity settings in the West Midlands of England. A qualitative design involving a series of six focus groups with midwives and Supervisors of Midwives was employed to investigate the facilitators of, and barriers to the completion of maternal observations. Results Eighteen Midwives and 8 Supervisors of Midwives participated in a total of 6 focus groups. Three key themes emerged from the data: (1) Organisation of Maternal Observations (including delegation of tasks to Midwifery Support Workers, variation in their training, the care model used e.g. one to one care, and staffing issues); (2) Prioritisation of Maternal Observations (including the role of professional judgement and concerns expressed by midwives that they did not feel equipped to care for women with complex clinical needs; and (3) Negotiated Escalation (including the inappropriate response from senior staff to use of Modified Early Warning Score systems, and the emotional impact of escalation). Conclusions A number of organisational and cultural barriers exist to the completion of maternal observations and the escalation of concerns. In order to address these the following actions are recommended: standardised training for Midwifery Support Workers, review of training of midwives to ensure it addresses the increasing complexity of the maternal population, identification and agreement regarding the organisation of maternal observations among staff, an emphasis on increasing the priority placed on maternal observations in all clinical settings, and clarification and reinforcement of escalation procedures for both midwives and senior clinicians.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12884-017-1472-8MidwiferyMaternal observationsEscalationSafetyMaternal deathsBarriers
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Justine Jeffery
Alistair Hewison
Laura Goodwin
Sara Kenyon
spellingShingle Justine Jeffery
Alistair Hewison
Laura Goodwin
Sara Kenyon
Midwives’ experiences of performing maternal observations and escalating concerns: a focus group study
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Midwifery
Maternal observations
Escalation
Safety
Maternal deaths
Barriers
author_facet Justine Jeffery
Alistair Hewison
Laura Goodwin
Sara Kenyon
author_sort Justine Jeffery
title Midwives’ experiences of performing maternal observations and escalating concerns: a focus group study
title_short Midwives’ experiences of performing maternal observations and escalating concerns: a focus group study
title_full Midwives’ experiences of performing maternal observations and escalating concerns: a focus group study
title_fullStr Midwives’ experiences of performing maternal observations and escalating concerns: a focus group study
title_full_unstemmed Midwives’ experiences of performing maternal observations and escalating concerns: a focus group study
title_sort midwives’ experiences of performing maternal observations and escalating concerns: a focus group study
publisher BMC
series BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
issn 1471-2393
publishDate 2017-09-01
description Abstract Background For the past decade, Maternal Mortality Reports, published in the United Kingdom every three years, have consistently raised concerns about maternal observations in maternity care. The reports identify that observations are not being done, not being completed fully, are not recorded on Early Warning Score systems, and/or are not escalated appropriately. This has resulted in delays in referral, intervention and increases the risk of maternal morbidity or mortality. However there has been little exploration of the possible reasons for non-completion of maternal observations. Methods The aim of this study was to explore midwives’ experiences of performing maternal observations and escalating concerns in rural and urban maternity settings in the West Midlands of England. A qualitative design involving a series of six focus groups with midwives and Supervisors of Midwives was employed to investigate the facilitators of, and barriers to the completion of maternal observations. Results Eighteen Midwives and 8 Supervisors of Midwives participated in a total of 6 focus groups. Three key themes emerged from the data: (1) Organisation of Maternal Observations (including delegation of tasks to Midwifery Support Workers, variation in their training, the care model used e.g. one to one care, and staffing issues); (2) Prioritisation of Maternal Observations (including the role of professional judgement and concerns expressed by midwives that they did not feel equipped to care for women with complex clinical needs; and (3) Negotiated Escalation (including the inappropriate response from senior staff to use of Modified Early Warning Score systems, and the emotional impact of escalation). Conclusions A number of organisational and cultural barriers exist to the completion of maternal observations and the escalation of concerns. In order to address these the following actions are recommended: standardised training for Midwifery Support Workers, review of training of midwives to ensure it addresses the increasing complexity of the maternal population, identification and agreement regarding the organisation of maternal observations among staff, an emphasis on increasing the priority placed on maternal observations in all clinical settings, and clarification and reinforcement of escalation procedures for both midwives and senior clinicians.
topic Midwifery
Maternal observations
Escalation
Safety
Maternal deaths
Barriers
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12884-017-1472-8
work_keys_str_mv AT justinejeffery midwivesexperiencesofperformingmaternalobservationsandescalatingconcernsafocusgroupstudy
AT alistairhewison midwivesexperiencesofperformingmaternalobservationsandescalatingconcernsafocusgroupstudy
AT lauragoodwin midwivesexperiencesofperformingmaternalobservationsandescalatingconcernsafocusgroupstudy
AT sarakenyon midwivesexperiencesofperformingmaternalobservationsandescalatingconcernsafocusgroupstudy
_version_ 1716789711506243584