Effect of lifestyle intervention for people with diabetes or prediabetes in real-world primary care: propensity score analysis

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Many lifestyle interventions for patients with prediabetes or type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) have been investigated in randomised clinical trial settings. However, the translation of these programmes into primary care seems challeng...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gidding Luc G, de Bakker Marlies, Lucas Annelies EM, Deneer Linda, Spigt Mark G, Linmans Joris J, Linssen Rik, Knottnerus J André
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2011-09-01
Series:BMC Family Practice
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2296/12/95
id doaj-e6e275806caf42af9a78ae8e463795f8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e6e275806caf42af9a78ae8e463795f82020-11-25T03:57:03ZengBMCBMC Family Practice1471-22962011-09-011219510.1186/1471-2296-12-95Effect of lifestyle intervention for people with diabetes or prediabetes in real-world primary care: propensity score analysisGidding Luc Gde Bakker MarliesLucas Annelies EMDeneer LindaSpigt Mark GLinmans Joris JLinssen RikKnottnerus J André<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Many lifestyle interventions for patients with prediabetes or type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) have been investigated in randomised clinical trial settings. However, the translation of these programmes into primary care seems challenging and the prevalence of T2DM is increasing. Therefore, there is an urgent need for lifestyle programmes, developed and shown to be effective in real-world primary care. We evaluated a lifestyle programme, commissioned by the Dutch government, for patients with prediabetes or type 2 diabetes in primary care.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We performed a retrospective comparative medical records analysis using propensity score matching. Patients with prediabetes or T2DM were selected from ten primary healthcare centres. Patients who received the lifestyle intervention (n = 186) were compared with a matched group of patients who received usual care (n = 2632). Data were extracted from the electronic primary care records. Propensity score matching was used to control for confounding by indication. Outcome measures were exercise level, BMI, HbA1c, fasting glucose, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, total cholesterol, HDL and LDL cholesterol and triglycerides and the follow-up period was one year.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>There was no significant difference at follow-up in any outcome measure between either group. The reduction at one year follow-up of HbA1c and fasting glucose was positive in the intervention group compared with controls, although not statistically significant (-0.12%, <it>P </it>= 0.07 and -0.17 mmol/l, <it>P </it>= 0.08 respectively).</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>The effects of the lifestyle programme in real-world primary care for patients with prediabetes or T2DM were small and not statistically significant. The attention of governments for lifestyle interventions is important, but from the available literature and the results of this study, it must be concluded that improving lifestyle in real-world primary care is still challenging.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2296/12/95
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Gidding Luc G
de Bakker Marlies
Lucas Annelies EM
Deneer Linda
Spigt Mark G
Linmans Joris J
Linssen Rik
Knottnerus J André
spellingShingle Gidding Luc G
de Bakker Marlies
Lucas Annelies EM
Deneer Linda
Spigt Mark G
Linmans Joris J
Linssen Rik
Knottnerus J André
Effect of lifestyle intervention for people with diabetes or prediabetes in real-world primary care: propensity score analysis
BMC Family Practice
author_facet Gidding Luc G
de Bakker Marlies
Lucas Annelies EM
Deneer Linda
Spigt Mark G
Linmans Joris J
Linssen Rik
Knottnerus J André
author_sort Gidding Luc G
title Effect of lifestyle intervention for people with diabetes or prediabetes in real-world primary care: propensity score analysis
title_short Effect of lifestyle intervention for people with diabetes or prediabetes in real-world primary care: propensity score analysis
title_full Effect of lifestyle intervention for people with diabetes or prediabetes in real-world primary care: propensity score analysis
title_fullStr Effect of lifestyle intervention for people with diabetes or prediabetes in real-world primary care: propensity score analysis
title_full_unstemmed Effect of lifestyle intervention for people with diabetes or prediabetes in real-world primary care: propensity score analysis
title_sort effect of lifestyle intervention for people with diabetes or prediabetes in real-world primary care: propensity score analysis
publisher BMC
series BMC Family Practice
issn 1471-2296
publishDate 2011-09-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Many lifestyle interventions for patients with prediabetes or type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) have been investigated in randomised clinical trial settings. However, the translation of these programmes into primary care seems challenging and the prevalence of T2DM is increasing. Therefore, there is an urgent need for lifestyle programmes, developed and shown to be effective in real-world primary care. We evaluated a lifestyle programme, commissioned by the Dutch government, for patients with prediabetes or type 2 diabetes in primary care.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We performed a retrospective comparative medical records analysis using propensity score matching. Patients with prediabetes or T2DM were selected from ten primary healthcare centres. Patients who received the lifestyle intervention (n = 186) were compared with a matched group of patients who received usual care (n = 2632). Data were extracted from the electronic primary care records. Propensity score matching was used to control for confounding by indication. Outcome measures were exercise level, BMI, HbA1c, fasting glucose, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, total cholesterol, HDL and LDL cholesterol and triglycerides and the follow-up period was one year.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>There was no significant difference at follow-up in any outcome measure between either group. The reduction at one year follow-up of HbA1c and fasting glucose was positive in the intervention group compared with controls, although not statistically significant (-0.12%, <it>P </it>= 0.07 and -0.17 mmol/l, <it>P </it>= 0.08 respectively).</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>The effects of the lifestyle programme in real-world primary care for patients with prediabetes or T2DM were small and not statistically significant. The attention of governments for lifestyle interventions is important, but from the available literature and the results of this study, it must be concluded that improving lifestyle in real-world primary care is still challenging.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2296/12/95
work_keys_str_mv AT giddinglucg effectoflifestyleinterventionforpeoplewithdiabetesorprediabetesinrealworldprimarycarepropensityscoreanalysis
AT debakkermarlies effectoflifestyleinterventionforpeoplewithdiabetesorprediabetesinrealworldprimarycarepropensityscoreanalysis
AT lucasanneliesem effectoflifestyleinterventionforpeoplewithdiabetesorprediabetesinrealworldprimarycarepropensityscoreanalysis
AT deneerlinda effectoflifestyleinterventionforpeoplewithdiabetesorprediabetesinrealworldprimarycarepropensityscoreanalysis
AT spigtmarkg effectoflifestyleinterventionforpeoplewithdiabetesorprediabetesinrealworldprimarycarepropensityscoreanalysis
AT linmansjorisj effectoflifestyleinterventionforpeoplewithdiabetesorprediabetesinrealworldprimarycarepropensityscoreanalysis
AT linssenrik effectoflifestyleinterventionforpeoplewithdiabetesorprediabetesinrealworldprimarycarepropensityscoreanalysis
AT knottnerusjandre effectoflifestyleinterventionforpeoplewithdiabetesorprediabetesinrealworldprimarycarepropensityscoreanalysis
_version_ 1724462224061235200