Chemical and Mechanical Differences between Historic and Modern Scots Pine Wood
Timber is one of the most common historic building materials, but relatively little is known about how it ages <i>in situ</i>. Here we investigate historic and modern Scots pine to determine any chemical or mechanical differences between them. Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) microscopy...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2020-02-01
|
Series: | Heritage |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2571-9408/3/1/7 |
id |
doaj-e6dddd627d454d998e35a5e02fc0602a |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-e6dddd627d454d998e35a5e02fc0602a2020-11-25T01:15:20ZengMDPI AGHeritage2571-94082020-02-013111612710.3390/heritage3010007heritage3010007Chemical and Mechanical Differences between Historic and Modern Scots Pine WoodKate Hudson-McAulay0Craig J. Kennedy1and Michael C. Jarvis2School of Chemistry, Glasgow University, Glasgow G12 8QQ, Scotland, UKSchool of Energy, Geoscience, Infrastructure and Society, Heriot Watt University, Edinburgh, EH14 4AS, Scotland, UKSchool of Chemistry, Glasgow University, Glasgow G12 8QQ, Scotland, UKTimber is one of the most common historic building materials, but relatively little is known about how it ages <i>in situ</i>. Here we investigate historic and modern Scots pine to determine any chemical or mechanical differences between them. Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) microscopy was used to investigate differences in the chemical composition of Scots pine (<i>Pinus sylvestris </i>L.) timber, comparing small samples from historic beams about 500 years old with modern timber. The hemicellulosic acetyl content was reduced by about half in the historic samples, uniformly across the thickness of the beams. A chemical mechanism was therefore suggested for the loss of acetyl groups, as has been observed in paper. In paper, deacetylation and the resulting release of acetic acid are accompanied by loss of strength. Mechanical testing of the historic timber was difficult because the available length of the samples along the grain was only 20 mm. After developing a miniaturized compression test developed for the purpose, it was shown that the relative stiffness of the historic Scots pine samples was reduced by about half compared to modern material.https://www.mdpi.com/2571-9408/3/1/7woodinfrared spectroscopyacetyldeacetylationstiffnesselastic modulus |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Kate Hudson-McAulay Craig J. Kennedy and Michael C. Jarvis |
spellingShingle |
Kate Hudson-McAulay Craig J. Kennedy and Michael C. Jarvis Chemical and Mechanical Differences between Historic and Modern Scots Pine Wood Heritage wood infrared spectroscopy acetyl deacetylation stiffness elastic modulus |
author_facet |
Kate Hudson-McAulay Craig J. Kennedy and Michael C. Jarvis |
author_sort |
Kate Hudson-McAulay |
title |
Chemical and Mechanical Differences between Historic and Modern Scots Pine Wood |
title_short |
Chemical and Mechanical Differences between Historic and Modern Scots Pine Wood |
title_full |
Chemical and Mechanical Differences between Historic and Modern Scots Pine Wood |
title_fullStr |
Chemical and Mechanical Differences between Historic and Modern Scots Pine Wood |
title_full_unstemmed |
Chemical and Mechanical Differences between Historic and Modern Scots Pine Wood |
title_sort |
chemical and mechanical differences between historic and modern scots pine wood |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Heritage |
issn |
2571-9408 |
publishDate |
2020-02-01 |
description |
Timber is one of the most common historic building materials, but relatively little is known about how it ages <i>in situ</i>. Here we investigate historic and modern Scots pine to determine any chemical or mechanical differences between them. Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) microscopy was used to investigate differences in the chemical composition of Scots pine (<i>Pinus sylvestris </i>L.) timber, comparing small samples from historic beams about 500 years old with modern timber. The hemicellulosic acetyl content was reduced by about half in the historic samples, uniformly across the thickness of the beams. A chemical mechanism was therefore suggested for the loss of acetyl groups, as has been observed in paper. In paper, deacetylation and the resulting release of acetic acid are accompanied by loss of strength. Mechanical testing of the historic timber was difficult because the available length of the samples along the grain was only 20 mm. After developing a miniaturized compression test developed for the purpose, it was shown that the relative stiffness of the historic Scots pine samples was reduced by about half compared to modern material. |
topic |
wood infrared spectroscopy acetyl deacetylation stiffness elastic modulus |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2571-9408/3/1/7 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT katehudsonmcaulay chemicalandmechanicaldifferencesbetweenhistoricandmodernscotspinewood AT craigjkennedy chemicalandmechanicaldifferencesbetweenhistoricandmodernscotspinewood AT andmichaelcjarvis chemicalandmechanicaldifferencesbetweenhistoricandmodernscotspinewood |
_version_ |
1725153932566593536 |