Chemical and Mechanical Differences between Historic and Modern Scots Pine Wood

Timber is one of the most common historic building materials, but relatively little is known about how it ages <i>in situ</i>. Here we investigate historic and modern Scots pine to determine any chemical or mechanical differences between them. Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) microscopy...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kate Hudson-McAulay, Craig J. Kennedy, and Michael C. Jarvis
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-02-01
Series:Heritage
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2571-9408/3/1/7
id doaj-e6dddd627d454d998e35a5e02fc0602a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e6dddd627d454d998e35a5e02fc0602a2020-11-25T01:15:20ZengMDPI AGHeritage2571-94082020-02-013111612710.3390/heritage3010007heritage3010007Chemical and Mechanical Differences between Historic and Modern Scots Pine WoodKate Hudson-McAulay0Craig J. Kennedy1and Michael C. Jarvis2School of Chemistry, Glasgow University, Glasgow G12 8QQ, Scotland, UKSchool of Energy, Geoscience, Infrastructure and Society, Heriot Watt University, Edinburgh, EH14 4AS, Scotland, UKSchool of Chemistry, Glasgow University, Glasgow G12 8QQ, Scotland, UKTimber is one of the most common historic building materials, but relatively little is known about how it ages <i>in situ</i>. Here we investigate historic and modern Scots pine to determine any chemical or mechanical differences between them. Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) microscopy was used to investigate differences in the chemical composition of Scots pine (<i>Pinus sylvestris </i>L.) timber, comparing small samples from historic beams about 500 years old with modern timber. The hemicellulosic acetyl content was reduced by about half in the historic samples, uniformly across the thickness of the beams. A chemical mechanism was therefore suggested for the loss of acetyl groups, as has been observed in paper. In paper, deacetylation and the resulting release of acetic acid are accompanied by loss of strength. Mechanical testing of the historic timber was difficult because the available length of the samples along the grain was only 20 mm. After developing a miniaturized compression test developed for the purpose, it was shown that the relative stiffness of the historic Scots pine samples was reduced by about half compared to modern material.https://www.mdpi.com/2571-9408/3/1/7woodinfrared spectroscopyacetyldeacetylationstiffnesselastic modulus
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kate Hudson-McAulay
Craig J. Kennedy
and Michael C. Jarvis
spellingShingle Kate Hudson-McAulay
Craig J. Kennedy
and Michael C. Jarvis
Chemical and Mechanical Differences between Historic and Modern Scots Pine Wood
Heritage
wood
infrared spectroscopy
acetyl
deacetylation
stiffness
elastic modulus
author_facet Kate Hudson-McAulay
Craig J. Kennedy
and Michael C. Jarvis
author_sort Kate Hudson-McAulay
title Chemical and Mechanical Differences between Historic and Modern Scots Pine Wood
title_short Chemical and Mechanical Differences between Historic and Modern Scots Pine Wood
title_full Chemical and Mechanical Differences between Historic and Modern Scots Pine Wood
title_fullStr Chemical and Mechanical Differences between Historic and Modern Scots Pine Wood
title_full_unstemmed Chemical and Mechanical Differences between Historic and Modern Scots Pine Wood
title_sort chemical and mechanical differences between historic and modern scots pine wood
publisher MDPI AG
series Heritage
issn 2571-9408
publishDate 2020-02-01
description Timber is one of the most common historic building materials, but relatively little is known about how it ages <i>in situ</i>. Here we investigate historic and modern Scots pine to determine any chemical or mechanical differences between them. Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) microscopy was used to investigate differences in the chemical composition of Scots pine (<i>Pinus sylvestris </i>L.) timber, comparing small samples from historic beams about 500 years old with modern timber. The hemicellulosic acetyl content was reduced by about half in the historic samples, uniformly across the thickness of the beams. A chemical mechanism was therefore suggested for the loss of acetyl groups, as has been observed in paper. In paper, deacetylation and the resulting release of acetic acid are accompanied by loss of strength. Mechanical testing of the historic timber was difficult because the available length of the samples along the grain was only 20 mm. After developing a miniaturized compression test developed for the purpose, it was shown that the relative stiffness of the historic Scots pine samples was reduced by about half compared to modern material.
topic wood
infrared spectroscopy
acetyl
deacetylation
stiffness
elastic modulus
url https://www.mdpi.com/2571-9408/3/1/7
work_keys_str_mv AT katehudsonmcaulay chemicalandmechanicaldifferencesbetweenhistoricandmodernscotspinewood
AT craigjkennedy chemicalandmechanicaldifferencesbetweenhistoricandmodernscotspinewood
AT andmichaelcjarvis chemicalandmechanicaldifferencesbetweenhistoricandmodernscotspinewood
_version_ 1725153932566593536