Belief Shift or Only Facilitation: How Semantic Expectancy Affects Processing of Speech Degraded by Background Noise

Individuals use semantic expectancy – applying conceptual and linguistic knowledge to speech input – to improve the accuracy and speed of language comprehension. This study tested how adults use semantic expectancy in quiet and in the presence of speech-shaped broadband noise at -7 and -12 dB signal...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Katherine M. Simeon, Klinton Bicknell, Tina M. Grieco-Calub
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-02-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00116/full
id doaj-e6da22071e7d4632aa0ae4fb832a0142
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e6da22071e7d4632aa0ae4fb832a01422020-11-24T23:04:17ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782018-02-01910.3389/fpsyg.2018.00116302999Belief Shift or Only Facilitation: How Semantic Expectancy Affects Processing of Speech Degraded by Background NoiseKatherine M. Simeon0Klinton Bicknell1Tina M. Grieco-Calub2Tina M. Grieco-Calub3The Roxelyn and Richard Pepper Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, United StatesDepartment of Linguistics, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, United StatesThe Roxelyn and Richard Pepper Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, United StatesHugh Knowles Hearing Center, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, United StatesIndividuals use semantic expectancy – applying conceptual and linguistic knowledge to speech input – to improve the accuracy and speed of language comprehension. This study tested how adults use semantic expectancy in quiet and in the presence of speech-shaped broadband noise at -7 and -12 dB signal-to-noise ratio. Twenty-four adults (22.1 ± 3.6 years, mean ±SD) were tested on a four-alternative-forced-choice task whereby they listened to sentences and were instructed to select an image matching the sentence-final word. The semantic expectancy of the sentences was unrelated to (neutral), congruent with, or conflicting with the acoustic target. Congruent expectancy improved accuracy and conflicting expectancy decreased accuracy relative to neutral, consistent with a theory where expectancy shifts beliefs toward likely words and away from unlikely words. Additionally, there were no significant interactions of expectancy and noise level when analyzed in log-odds, supporting the predictions of ideal observer models of speech perception.http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00116/fullsemantic expectancyideal observerlexical processingspeech perceptionbackground noise
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Katherine M. Simeon
Klinton Bicknell
Tina M. Grieco-Calub
Tina M. Grieco-Calub
spellingShingle Katherine M. Simeon
Klinton Bicknell
Tina M. Grieco-Calub
Tina M. Grieco-Calub
Belief Shift or Only Facilitation: How Semantic Expectancy Affects Processing of Speech Degraded by Background Noise
Frontiers in Psychology
semantic expectancy
ideal observer
lexical processing
speech perception
background noise
author_facet Katherine M. Simeon
Klinton Bicknell
Tina M. Grieco-Calub
Tina M. Grieco-Calub
author_sort Katherine M. Simeon
title Belief Shift or Only Facilitation: How Semantic Expectancy Affects Processing of Speech Degraded by Background Noise
title_short Belief Shift or Only Facilitation: How Semantic Expectancy Affects Processing of Speech Degraded by Background Noise
title_full Belief Shift or Only Facilitation: How Semantic Expectancy Affects Processing of Speech Degraded by Background Noise
title_fullStr Belief Shift or Only Facilitation: How Semantic Expectancy Affects Processing of Speech Degraded by Background Noise
title_full_unstemmed Belief Shift or Only Facilitation: How Semantic Expectancy Affects Processing of Speech Degraded by Background Noise
title_sort belief shift or only facilitation: how semantic expectancy affects processing of speech degraded by background noise
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2018-02-01
description Individuals use semantic expectancy – applying conceptual and linguistic knowledge to speech input – to improve the accuracy and speed of language comprehension. This study tested how adults use semantic expectancy in quiet and in the presence of speech-shaped broadband noise at -7 and -12 dB signal-to-noise ratio. Twenty-four adults (22.1 ± 3.6 years, mean ±SD) were tested on a four-alternative-forced-choice task whereby they listened to sentences and were instructed to select an image matching the sentence-final word. The semantic expectancy of the sentences was unrelated to (neutral), congruent with, or conflicting with the acoustic target. Congruent expectancy improved accuracy and conflicting expectancy decreased accuracy relative to neutral, consistent with a theory where expectancy shifts beliefs toward likely words and away from unlikely words. Additionally, there were no significant interactions of expectancy and noise level when analyzed in log-odds, supporting the predictions of ideal observer models of speech perception.
topic semantic expectancy
ideal observer
lexical processing
speech perception
background noise
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00116/full
work_keys_str_mv AT katherinemsimeon beliefshiftoronlyfacilitationhowsemanticexpectancyaffectsprocessingofspeechdegradedbybackgroundnoise
AT klintonbicknell beliefshiftoronlyfacilitationhowsemanticexpectancyaffectsprocessingofspeechdegradedbybackgroundnoise
AT tinamgriecocalub beliefshiftoronlyfacilitationhowsemanticexpectancyaffectsprocessingofspeechdegradedbybackgroundnoise
AT tinamgriecocalub beliefshiftoronlyfacilitationhowsemanticexpectancyaffectsprocessingofspeechdegradedbybackgroundnoise
_version_ 1725631500807831552