The Status and Relevance of Phenomenology for Integral Research: Or Why Phenomenology is More and Different than an “Upper Left” or “Zone #1” Affair
The specific treatment that Ken Wilber gives phenomenology in his model of integral theory requires a critical investigation. According to Wilber’s model, different methodologies are situated in distinct quadrants or “domains of knowing,” namely the subjective, objective, intersubjective and interob...
Main Author: | Wendelin M. Küpers |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | deu |
Published: |
ARINA, Inc.
2009-06-01
|
Series: | Integral Review |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://integral-review.org/pdf-template-issue.php?pdfName=vol_5_no_1_kupers_the_status_and_relevance_of_phenomenology_for_integral_research.pdf |
Similar Items
-
The Status and Relevance of Phenomenology for Integral Research: Or Why Phenomenology is More and Different than an “Upper Left” or “Zone #1” Affair
by: Wendelin M. Küpers
Published: (2009-06-01) -
English Summary of Kupers
by: Wendelin Küpers
Published: (2006-06-01) -
‘Inter-Bridging’ Bridges and Bridging as Metaphors for ‘syn-integrality’ in Organization Studies and Practice
by: Wendelin Küpers, et al.
Published: (2015-09-01) -
From essence to Lebenswelt as a method in phenomenological psychopathology
by: Virginia MOREIRA -
A Phenomenology of Incarnate Experience
by: Brittingham, John Thomas
Published: (2014)