Results of Vertebral Augmentation Treatment for Patients of Painful Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures: A Meta-Analysis of Eight Randomized Controlled Trials.

In 2009 two RCTs were publicated to question the efficacy of vertebroplasty comparing with sham treatment (ST) in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM), which provoked an academic debate on the efficacy of PVA. The purposes of our study were to compare clinical differences in pain relief, spina...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lianhua Li, Jixin Ren, Jia Liu, Hao Wang, Xiaowei Wang, Zhi Liu, Tiansheng Sun
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2015-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4574925?pdf=render
id doaj-e6c7c24c0f174db5abfa5b815c2adde0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e6c7c24c0f174db5abfa5b815c2adde02020-11-24T21:50:35ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032015-01-01109e013812610.1371/journal.pone.0138126Results of Vertebral Augmentation Treatment for Patients of Painful Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures: A Meta-Analysis of Eight Randomized Controlled Trials.Lianhua LiJixin RenJia LiuHao WangXiaowei WangZhi LiuTiansheng SunIn 2009 two RCTs were publicated to question the efficacy of vertebroplasty comparing with sham treatment (ST) in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM), which provoked an academic debate on the efficacy of PVA. The purposes of our study were to compare clinical differences in pain relief, spinal functional outcomes, and overall quality of life between PVA and CT for painful osteoporotic VCFs.We searched PubMed, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Web of Knowledge from January 1980 to June 2013 with Medical Subject Headings terms and keywords. Risk of bias in the included studies was assessed in accordance with the Cochrane risk of bias tool. In this Meta-analysis dichotomous and continuous variables were calculated using the risk ratio (RR) and standardized mean difference (SMD), respectively.Eight studies involving 987 patients met the criteria for inclusion. The VAS SMD was favoring the experimental group significantly (p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis suggested that the patients performed PVA with mean fracture age less than 3 months would got pain relief earlier and more durable than the control group (P <0.05). The SMD of spinal function assessed with RDQ and Oswestry LBP data was in favor of the experimental groups. QOL outcome improvement was demonstrated statistically significant at early, middle and late-term follow-up for PVA than the control group (P <0.05).In conclusion, this meta-analysis, which evaluated PVA for osteoporotic VCFs, demonstrated significant improvement regarding VAS, spinal function and QOL outcomes. The optimal fracture age was less than 12 weeks.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4574925?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Lianhua Li
Jixin Ren
Jia Liu
Hao Wang
Xiaowei Wang
Zhi Liu
Tiansheng Sun
spellingShingle Lianhua Li
Jixin Ren
Jia Liu
Hao Wang
Xiaowei Wang
Zhi Liu
Tiansheng Sun
Results of Vertebral Augmentation Treatment for Patients of Painful Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures: A Meta-Analysis of Eight Randomized Controlled Trials.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Lianhua Li
Jixin Ren
Jia Liu
Hao Wang
Xiaowei Wang
Zhi Liu
Tiansheng Sun
author_sort Lianhua Li
title Results of Vertebral Augmentation Treatment for Patients of Painful Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures: A Meta-Analysis of Eight Randomized Controlled Trials.
title_short Results of Vertebral Augmentation Treatment for Patients of Painful Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures: A Meta-Analysis of Eight Randomized Controlled Trials.
title_full Results of Vertebral Augmentation Treatment for Patients of Painful Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures: A Meta-Analysis of Eight Randomized Controlled Trials.
title_fullStr Results of Vertebral Augmentation Treatment for Patients of Painful Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures: A Meta-Analysis of Eight Randomized Controlled Trials.
title_full_unstemmed Results of Vertebral Augmentation Treatment for Patients of Painful Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures: A Meta-Analysis of Eight Randomized Controlled Trials.
title_sort results of vertebral augmentation treatment for patients of painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a meta-analysis of eight randomized controlled trials.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2015-01-01
description In 2009 two RCTs were publicated to question the efficacy of vertebroplasty comparing with sham treatment (ST) in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM), which provoked an academic debate on the efficacy of PVA. The purposes of our study were to compare clinical differences in pain relief, spinal functional outcomes, and overall quality of life between PVA and CT for painful osteoporotic VCFs.We searched PubMed, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Web of Knowledge from January 1980 to June 2013 with Medical Subject Headings terms and keywords. Risk of bias in the included studies was assessed in accordance with the Cochrane risk of bias tool. In this Meta-analysis dichotomous and continuous variables were calculated using the risk ratio (RR) and standardized mean difference (SMD), respectively.Eight studies involving 987 patients met the criteria for inclusion. The VAS SMD was favoring the experimental group significantly (p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis suggested that the patients performed PVA with mean fracture age less than 3 months would got pain relief earlier and more durable than the control group (P <0.05). The SMD of spinal function assessed with RDQ and Oswestry LBP data was in favor of the experimental groups. QOL outcome improvement was demonstrated statistically significant at early, middle and late-term follow-up for PVA than the control group (P <0.05).In conclusion, this meta-analysis, which evaluated PVA for osteoporotic VCFs, demonstrated significant improvement regarding VAS, spinal function and QOL outcomes. The optimal fracture age was less than 12 weeks.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4574925?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT lianhuali resultsofvertebralaugmentationtreatmentforpatientsofpainfulosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfracturesametaanalysisofeightrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT jixinren resultsofvertebralaugmentationtreatmentforpatientsofpainfulosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfracturesametaanalysisofeightrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT jialiu resultsofvertebralaugmentationtreatmentforpatientsofpainfulosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfracturesametaanalysisofeightrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT haowang resultsofvertebralaugmentationtreatmentforpatientsofpainfulosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfracturesametaanalysisofeightrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT xiaoweiwang resultsofvertebralaugmentationtreatmentforpatientsofpainfulosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfracturesametaanalysisofeightrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT zhiliu resultsofvertebralaugmentationtreatmentforpatientsofpainfulosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfracturesametaanalysisofeightrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT tianshengsun resultsofvertebralaugmentationtreatmentforpatientsofpainfulosteoporoticvertebralcompressionfracturesametaanalysisofeightrandomizedcontrolledtrials
_version_ 1725882952471019520