A benchmarking study of two trauma centres highlighting limitations when standardising mortality for comorbidity
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Introduction</p> <p>A continuous process of trauma centre evaluation is essential to ensure the development and progression of trauma care at regional, national and international levels. Evaluation may be by comparison between pooled datasets or by di...
Main Authors: | McKenzie Gilbert, Oakley Peter A, Almond Laurence M, Budd Henry R, Danne Peter |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2008-01-01
|
Series: | World Journal of Emergency Surgery |
Online Access: | http://www.wjes.org/content/3/1/2 |
Similar Items
-
Standardisation of Cost Accounting for Cost-Benchmarking
by: Günther, Edeltraud, et al.
Published: (2001) -
National Survey Highlights the Urgent Need for Standardisation of Embryo Transfer Techniques in the UK
by: Lewis Nancarrow, et al.
Published: (2021-06-01) -
Quantifying the potential bias when directly comparing standardised mortality ratios for in-unit neonatal mortality.
by: T Alun Evans, et al.
Published: (2013-01-01) -
Standardised proformas improve patient handover: Audit of trauma handover practice
by: Metcalfe Andrew J, et al.
Published: (2008-09-01) -
A descriptive and model-based spatial comparison of the standardised mortality ratio and the age-standardised mortality rate
by: Sibylle Sturtz, et al.
Published: (2007-05-01)