On the need for system alignment in large water infrastructure. Understanding infrastructure dynamics in Nairobi, Kenya
In this article we contribute to the discussion of infrastructural change in Africa, and explore how a new theoretical perspective may offer a different, more comprehensive and historically informed understanding of the trend towards large water infrastructure in Africa. We examine the socio-tech...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Water Alternatives Association
2017-06-01
|
Series: | Water Alternatives |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol10/v10issue2/356-a10-2-6/file |
id |
doaj-e6b36a3a2d4349a88b1578ed27e964a1 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-e6b36a3a2d4349a88b1578ed27e964a12020-11-24T23:20:07ZengWater Alternatives AssociationWater Alternatives1965-01751965-01752017-06-01102283302On the need for system alignment in large water infrastructure. Understanding infrastructure dynamics in Nairobi, Kenya Pär Blomkvist0David Nilsson1KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden; KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, In this article we contribute to the discussion of infrastructural change in Africa, and explore how a new theoretical perspective may offer a different, more comprehensive and historically informed understanding of the trend towards large water infrastructure in Africa. We examine the socio-technical dynamics of large water infrastructures in Nairobi, Kenya, in a longer historical perspective using two concepts that we call intra-systemic alignment and inter-level alignment. Our theoretical perspective is inspired by Large Technical Systems (LTS) and Multi-Level Perspective (MLP). While inter-level alignment focuses on the process of aligning the technological system at the three levels of niche, regime and landscape, intra-systemic alignment deals with how components within the regime are harmonised and standardised to fit with each other. We pay special attention to intrasystemic alignment between the supply side and the demand side, or as we put it, upstream and downstream components of a system. In narrating the history of water supply in Nairobi, we look at both the upstream (largescale supply) and downstream activities (distribution and payment), and compare the Nairobi case with European history of large infrastructures. We emphasise that regime actors in Nairobi have dealt with the issues of alignment mainly to facilitate and expand upstream activities, while concerning downstream activities they have remained incapable of expanding service and thus integrating the large segment of low-income consumers. We conclude that the present surge of large-scale water investment in Nairobi is the result of sector reforms that enabled the return to a long tradition – a 'Nairobi style' – of upstream investment mainly benefitting the highincome earners. Our proposition is that much more attention needs to be directed at inter-level alignment at the downstream end of the system, to allow the creation of niches aligned to the regime. http://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol10/v10issue2/356-a10-2-6/fileWater developmentinfrastructuredeveloping countriesdevelopment policyMulti-Level Perspective (MLP)Kenya |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Pär Blomkvist David Nilsson |
spellingShingle |
Pär Blomkvist David Nilsson On the need for system alignment in large water infrastructure. Understanding infrastructure dynamics in Nairobi, Kenya Water Alternatives Water development infrastructure developing countries development policy Multi-Level Perspective (MLP) Kenya |
author_facet |
Pär Blomkvist David Nilsson |
author_sort |
Pär Blomkvist |
title |
On the need for system alignment in large water infrastructure. Understanding infrastructure dynamics in Nairobi, Kenya |
title_short |
On the need for system alignment in large water infrastructure. Understanding infrastructure dynamics in Nairobi, Kenya |
title_full |
On the need for system alignment in large water infrastructure. Understanding infrastructure dynamics in Nairobi, Kenya |
title_fullStr |
On the need for system alignment in large water infrastructure. Understanding infrastructure dynamics in Nairobi, Kenya |
title_full_unstemmed |
On the need for system alignment in large water infrastructure. Understanding infrastructure dynamics in Nairobi, Kenya |
title_sort |
on the need for system alignment in large water infrastructure. understanding infrastructure dynamics in nairobi, kenya |
publisher |
Water Alternatives Association |
series |
Water Alternatives |
issn |
1965-0175 1965-0175 |
publishDate |
2017-06-01 |
description |
In this article we contribute to the discussion of infrastructural change in Africa, and explore how a
new theoretical perspective may offer a different, more comprehensive and historically informed understanding
of the trend towards large water infrastructure in Africa. We examine the socio-technical dynamics of large water
infrastructures in Nairobi, Kenya, in a longer historical perspective using two concepts that we call intra-systemic
alignment and inter-level alignment. Our theoretical perspective is inspired by Large Technical Systems (LTS) and
Multi-Level Perspective (MLP). While inter-level alignment focuses on the process of aligning the technological
system at the three levels of niche, regime and landscape, intra-systemic alignment deals with how components
within the regime are harmonised and standardised to fit with each other. We pay special attention to intrasystemic
alignment between the supply side and the demand side, or as we put it, upstream and downstream
components of a system. In narrating the history of water supply in Nairobi, we look at both the upstream (largescale
supply) and downstream activities (distribution and payment), and compare the Nairobi case with European
history of large infrastructures. We emphasise that regime actors in Nairobi have dealt with the issues of
alignment mainly to facilitate and expand upstream activities, while concerning downstream activities they have
remained incapable of expanding service and thus integrating the large segment of low-income consumers. We
conclude that the present surge of large-scale water investment in Nairobi is the result of sector reforms that
enabled the return to a long tradition – a 'Nairobi style' – of upstream investment mainly benefitting the highincome
earners. Our proposition is that much more attention needs to be directed at inter-level alignment at the
downstream end of the system, to allow the creation of niches aligned to the regime.
|
topic |
Water development infrastructure developing countries development policy Multi-Level Perspective (MLP) Kenya |
url |
http://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol10/v10issue2/356-a10-2-6/file |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT parblomkvist ontheneedforsystemalignmentinlargewaterinfrastructureunderstandinginfrastructuredynamicsinnairobikenya AT davidnilsson ontheneedforsystemalignmentinlargewaterinfrastructureunderstandinginfrastructuredynamicsinnairobikenya |
_version_ |
1725575967180587008 |