What Lenneberg Got Right: A Homological Program for the Study of Language Evolution
By 1967, it was clear to Eric Lenneberg that reconstructing the phylogenetic history of language should require the adoption of a non-functional (or Owenian) homology concept for grounding relevant comparisons. Fifty years later, most biolinguistic approaches have betrayed this project, for they rou...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Biolinguistics
2017-12-01
|
Series: | Biolinguistics |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://biolinguistics.eu/index.php/biolinguistics/article/view/498 |
id |
doaj-e6a1fd91b88d4410849ae180f5fdb8da |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-e6a1fd91b88d4410849ae180f5fdb8da2020-11-24T22:06:50ZengBiolinguisticsBiolinguistics1450-34172017-12-0111SI139170252What Lenneberg Got Right: A Homological Program for the Study of Language EvolutionSergio BalariGuillermo LorenzoBy 1967, it was clear to Eric Lenneberg that reconstructing the phylogenetic history of language should require the adoption of a non-functional (or Owenian) homology concept for grounding relevant comparisons. Fifty years later, most biolinguistic approaches have betrayed this project, for they routinely derive their conclusions regarding the unique/shared status of language on merely folk grounds — as dramatically illustrated in Hauser, Chomsky & Fitch vs. Pinker & Jackendoff’s debate, or based on functional considerations — as in Chomsky’s recent conceptualization of language as a unique tool for thought. Here we claim that Lenneberg’s project needs to be resumed and we articulate some suggestions about how to conduct it, taking advantage of recent findings and new conceptual insights concerning two crucial levels of analysis actually pinpointed by him — namely, anatomical/molecular structure and physiological function.https://biolinguistics.eu/index.php/biolinguistics/article/view/498homology thinkingcharacter conceptevolutionary noveltiescomputational mind |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Sergio Balari Guillermo Lorenzo |
spellingShingle |
Sergio Balari Guillermo Lorenzo What Lenneberg Got Right: A Homological Program for the Study of Language Evolution Biolinguistics homology thinking character concept evolutionary novelties computational mind |
author_facet |
Sergio Balari Guillermo Lorenzo |
author_sort |
Sergio Balari |
title |
What Lenneberg Got Right: A Homological Program for the Study of Language Evolution |
title_short |
What Lenneberg Got Right: A Homological Program for the Study of Language Evolution |
title_full |
What Lenneberg Got Right: A Homological Program for the Study of Language Evolution |
title_fullStr |
What Lenneberg Got Right: A Homological Program for the Study of Language Evolution |
title_full_unstemmed |
What Lenneberg Got Right: A Homological Program for the Study of Language Evolution |
title_sort |
what lenneberg got right: a homological program for the study of language evolution |
publisher |
Biolinguistics |
series |
Biolinguistics |
issn |
1450-3417 |
publishDate |
2017-12-01 |
description |
By 1967, it was clear to Eric Lenneberg that reconstructing the phylogenetic history of language should require the adoption of a non-functional (or Owenian) homology concept for grounding relevant comparisons. Fifty years later, most biolinguistic approaches have betrayed this project, for they routinely derive their conclusions regarding the unique/shared status of language on merely folk grounds — as dramatically illustrated in Hauser, Chomsky & Fitch vs. Pinker & Jackendoff’s debate, or based on functional considerations — as in Chomsky’s recent conceptualization of language as a unique tool for thought. Here we claim that Lenneberg’s project needs to be resumed and we articulate some suggestions about how to conduct it, taking advantage of recent findings and new conceptual insights concerning two crucial levels of analysis actually pinpointed by him — namely, anatomical/molecular structure and physiological function. |
topic |
homology thinking character concept evolutionary novelties computational mind |
url |
https://biolinguistics.eu/index.php/biolinguistics/article/view/498 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT sergiobalari whatlenneberggotrightahomologicalprogramforthestudyoflanguageevolution AT guillermolorenzo whatlenneberggotrightahomologicalprogramforthestudyoflanguageevolution |
_version_ |
1725821578618339328 |