The relationship between low-level cloud amount and its proxies over the globe by cloud type

<p>We extend upon previous work to examine the relationship between low-level cloud amount (LCA) and various proxies for LCA – estimated low-level cloud fraction (ELF), lower tropospheric stability (LTS), and estimated inversion strength (EIS) – by low-level cloud type (CL) over the globe usin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: J. Shin, S. Park
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2020-03-01
Series:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Online Access:https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/20/3041/2020/acp-20-3041-2020.pdf
id doaj-e6777161041c4e39baccf56967e5627b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e6777161041c4e39baccf56967e5627b2020-11-25T03:02:16ZengCopernicus PublicationsAtmospheric Chemistry and Physics1680-73161680-73242020-03-01203041306010.5194/acp-20-3041-2020The relationship between low-level cloud amount and its proxies over the globe by cloud typeJ. ShinS. Park<p>We extend upon previous work to examine the relationship between low-level cloud amount (LCA) and various proxies for LCA – estimated low-level cloud fraction (ELF), lower tropospheric stability (LTS), and estimated inversion strength (EIS) – by low-level cloud type (CL) over the globe using individual surface and upper-air observations. Individual CL has its own distinct environmental structure, and therefore our extended analysis by CL can provide insights into the strengths and weaknesses of various proxies and help to improve them.</p> <p>Overall, ELF performs better than LTS and EIS in diagnosing the variations in LCA among various CLs, indicating that a previously identified superior performance of ELF compared to LTS and EIS as a global proxy for LCA comes from its realistic correlations with various CLs rather than with a specific CL. However, ELF, LTS, and EIS have a problem in diagnosing the changes in LCA when noCL (no low-level cloud) is reported and also when Cu (cumulus) is reported over deserts where background stratus does not exist. This incorrect diagnosis of noCL as a cloudy condition is more clearly seen in the analysis of individual CL frequencies binned by proxy values. If noCL is excluded, ELF, LTS, and EIS have good inter-CL correlations with the amount when present (AWP) of individual CLs. In the future, an advanced ELF needs to be formulated to deal with the decrease in LCA when the inversion base height is lower than the lifting condensation level to diagnose cumulus updraft fraction, as well as the amount of stratiform clouds and detrained cumulus, and to parameterize the scale height as a function of appropriate environmental variables.</p>https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/20/3041/2020/acp-20-3041-2020.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author J. Shin
S. Park
spellingShingle J. Shin
S. Park
The relationship between low-level cloud amount and its proxies over the globe by cloud type
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
author_facet J. Shin
S. Park
author_sort J. Shin
title The relationship between low-level cloud amount and its proxies over the globe by cloud type
title_short The relationship between low-level cloud amount and its proxies over the globe by cloud type
title_full The relationship between low-level cloud amount and its proxies over the globe by cloud type
title_fullStr The relationship between low-level cloud amount and its proxies over the globe by cloud type
title_full_unstemmed The relationship between low-level cloud amount and its proxies over the globe by cloud type
title_sort relationship between low-level cloud amount and its proxies over the globe by cloud type
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
issn 1680-7316
1680-7324
publishDate 2020-03-01
description <p>We extend upon previous work to examine the relationship between low-level cloud amount (LCA) and various proxies for LCA – estimated low-level cloud fraction (ELF), lower tropospheric stability (LTS), and estimated inversion strength (EIS) – by low-level cloud type (CL) over the globe using individual surface and upper-air observations. Individual CL has its own distinct environmental structure, and therefore our extended analysis by CL can provide insights into the strengths and weaknesses of various proxies and help to improve them.</p> <p>Overall, ELF performs better than LTS and EIS in diagnosing the variations in LCA among various CLs, indicating that a previously identified superior performance of ELF compared to LTS and EIS as a global proxy for LCA comes from its realistic correlations with various CLs rather than with a specific CL. However, ELF, LTS, and EIS have a problem in diagnosing the changes in LCA when noCL (no low-level cloud) is reported and also when Cu (cumulus) is reported over deserts where background stratus does not exist. This incorrect diagnosis of noCL as a cloudy condition is more clearly seen in the analysis of individual CL frequencies binned by proxy values. If noCL is excluded, ELF, LTS, and EIS have good inter-CL correlations with the amount when present (AWP) of individual CLs. In the future, an advanced ELF needs to be formulated to deal with the decrease in LCA when the inversion base height is lower than the lifting condensation level to diagnose cumulus updraft fraction, as well as the amount of stratiform clouds and detrained cumulus, and to parameterize the scale height as a function of appropriate environmental variables.</p>
url https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/20/3041/2020/acp-20-3041-2020.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT jshin therelationshipbetweenlowlevelcloudamountanditsproxiesovertheglobebycloudtype
AT spark therelationshipbetweenlowlevelcloudamountanditsproxiesovertheglobebycloudtype
AT jshin relationshipbetweenlowlevelcloudamountanditsproxiesovertheglobebycloudtype
AT spark relationshipbetweenlowlevelcloudamountanditsproxiesovertheglobebycloudtype
_version_ 1724690556223750144