Embracing Variety in Decision-Making Regarding Adoption of Industry 4.0

Industry 4.0 embodies the three technology-based developmental streams currently available and is widely recognised whether it is viewed as a great step forward or not. Consequently, the interest in the topic of “implementation” regarding Industry 4.0 has grown in recent years. However, data to date...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Milou Habraken, Tanya Bondarouk
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-05-01
Series:Administrative Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/10/2/30
id doaj-e6708a28c521486da24d10a694bbb360
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e6708a28c521486da24d10a694bbb3602020-11-25T02:20:02ZengMDPI AGAdministrative Sciences2076-33872020-05-0110303010.3390/admsci10020030Embracing Variety in Decision-Making Regarding Adoption of Industry 4.0Milou Habraken0Tanya Bondarouk1Department of Human Resource Management, Faculty of Behavioural, Management and Social Sciences, University of Twente, Drienerlolaan 5, 7522 NB Enschede, the NetherlandsDepartment of Human Resource Management, Faculty of Behavioural, Management and Social Sciences, University of Twente, Drienerlolaan 5, 7522 NB Enschede, the NetherlandsIndustry 4.0 embodies the three technology-based developmental streams currently available and is widely recognised whether it is viewed as a great step forward or not. Consequently, the interest in the topic of “implementation” regarding Industry 4.0 has grown in recent years. However, data to date depict a somewhat single (technology-push, focused on organisational benefits) way of representing the drivers of Industry 4.0 adoption. In response, this paper intends to show to the scholarly and business communities that discussions in the literature on Industry 4.0 adoption drivers do not fully reflect the Industry 4.0 reality, which seems to us to be much more diverse. In other words, the goal is to provide an overview of the breadth and variation in drivers of Industry 4.0 adoption. This is achieved through assessing eight cases selected from the Dutch national and eastern regional platform for Industry 4.0. The cross-case analysis reveals the diversity in existing Industry 4.0 adoption drivers and highlights the apparent importance of the need-pull approach. It further highlights the relevant role that appears to be played by both internal supporting resources and external parties. Finally, it emphasises the diverse possibilities that the Industry 4.0 streams create.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/10/2/30Industry 4.0decision-makingtechnology adoption driverstechnology-push vs. need-pullintegrated approach
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Milou Habraken
Tanya Bondarouk
spellingShingle Milou Habraken
Tanya Bondarouk
Embracing Variety in Decision-Making Regarding Adoption of Industry 4.0
Administrative Sciences
Industry 4.0
decision-making
technology adoption drivers
technology-push vs. need-pull
integrated approach
author_facet Milou Habraken
Tanya Bondarouk
author_sort Milou Habraken
title Embracing Variety in Decision-Making Regarding Adoption of Industry 4.0
title_short Embracing Variety in Decision-Making Regarding Adoption of Industry 4.0
title_full Embracing Variety in Decision-Making Regarding Adoption of Industry 4.0
title_fullStr Embracing Variety in Decision-Making Regarding Adoption of Industry 4.0
title_full_unstemmed Embracing Variety in Decision-Making Regarding Adoption of Industry 4.0
title_sort embracing variety in decision-making regarding adoption of industry 4.0
publisher MDPI AG
series Administrative Sciences
issn 2076-3387
publishDate 2020-05-01
description Industry 4.0 embodies the three technology-based developmental streams currently available and is widely recognised whether it is viewed as a great step forward or not. Consequently, the interest in the topic of “implementation” regarding Industry 4.0 has grown in recent years. However, data to date depict a somewhat single (technology-push, focused on organisational benefits) way of representing the drivers of Industry 4.0 adoption. In response, this paper intends to show to the scholarly and business communities that discussions in the literature on Industry 4.0 adoption drivers do not fully reflect the Industry 4.0 reality, which seems to us to be much more diverse. In other words, the goal is to provide an overview of the breadth and variation in drivers of Industry 4.0 adoption. This is achieved through assessing eight cases selected from the Dutch national and eastern regional platform for Industry 4.0. The cross-case analysis reveals the diversity in existing Industry 4.0 adoption drivers and highlights the apparent importance of the need-pull approach. It further highlights the relevant role that appears to be played by both internal supporting resources and external parties. Finally, it emphasises the diverse possibilities that the Industry 4.0 streams create.
topic Industry 4.0
decision-making
technology adoption drivers
technology-push vs. need-pull
integrated approach
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/10/2/30
work_keys_str_mv AT milouhabraken embracingvarietyindecisionmakingregardingadoptionofindustry40
AT tanyabondarouk embracingvarietyindecisionmakingregardingadoptionofindustry40
_version_ 1724873935687778304