Hacia una visión dinámica de la ‘legalización’ de la política internacional: revisión crítica de la bibliografía

----- The concept of legalization was recently developed by neoliberal institutionalism as a special kind of institutionalization of international politics. Neoliberals built the concept of legalization using the analytical tools developed by H. L. A. Hart to distinguish law from other mechanisms o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Pablo Rueda Sáiz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidad del Rosario, Bogota 2010-04-01
Series:Desafíos
Subjects:
Online Access:https://revistas.urosario.edu.co/index.php/desafios/article/view/656
id doaj-e664eb8c7e614b5da24332f048c1515e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e664eb8c7e614b5da24332f048c1515e2020-11-25T00:17:51ZengUniversidad del Rosario, BogotaDesafíos0124-40352145-51122010-04-01100123154543Hacia una visión dinámica de la ‘legalización’ de la política internacional: revisión crítica de la bibliografíaPablo Rueda Sáiz----- The concept of legalization was recently developed by neoliberal institutionalism as a special kind of institutionalization of international politics. Neoliberals built the concept of legalization using the analytical tools developed by H. L. A. Hart to distinguish law from other mechanisms of social control, like power and morals. Within Hart’s theory, such tools have a normative function: theoretically rebuilding law as a system of rules that is independent from the will and the beliefs of those who interpret and apply legal rules. However, Hart’s resulting separation of legal texts from legal practice obscures important contributions that the analytical tradition in philosophy of language has made to the understanding of the relation between language and reality. Specifically, such a separation reduces law to simple forms and texts disregarding the extent to which legal practice gives meaning to legal texts. Adapting Hart’s conception of law to International Relations has at least one important methodological consequence: the formal analysis of treaties cannot explain the influence of international law over state behavior. To understand the influence of international law on state behavior, one must previously describe the relation between legal practice and the meaning of legal texts. Thus, a redefinition of neoliberal research agenda on legalization should focus on the way States and international courts construct the meaning of treaties and other international norms.https://revistas.urosario.edu.co/index.php/desafios/article/view/656Legalizaciónrelaciones internacionalesderecho internacionaljusticia internacionalneoliberalismo institucionalinstituciones internacionalesjurisprudencia internacionalpolítica judicialH. L. A. HartL. Wittgensteinfilosofía del lenguaje
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Pablo Rueda Sáiz
spellingShingle Pablo Rueda Sáiz
Hacia una visión dinámica de la ‘legalización’ de la política internacional: revisión crítica de la bibliografía
Desafíos
Legalización
relaciones internacionales
derecho internacional
justicia internacional
neoliberalismo institucional
instituciones internacionales
jurisprudencia internacional
política judicial
H. L. A. Hart
L. Wittgenstein
filosofía del lenguaje
author_facet Pablo Rueda Sáiz
author_sort Pablo Rueda Sáiz
title Hacia una visión dinámica de la ‘legalización’ de la política internacional: revisión crítica de la bibliografía
title_short Hacia una visión dinámica de la ‘legalización’ de la política internacional: revisión crítica de la bibliografía
title_full Hacia una visión dinámica de la ‘legalización’ de la política internacional: revisión crítica de la bibliografía
title_fullStr Hacia una visión dinámica de la ‘legalización’ de la política internacional: revisión crítica de la bibliografía
title_full_unstemmed Hacia una visión dinámica de la ‘legalización’ de la política internacional: revisión crítica de la bibliografía
title_sort hacia una visión dinámica de la ‘legalización’ de la política internacional: revisión crítica de la bibliografía
publisher Universidad del Rosario, Bogota
series Desafíos
issn 0124-4035
2145-5112
publishDate 2010-04-01
description ----- The concept of legalization was recently developed by neoliberal institutionalism as a special kind of institutionalization of international politics. Neoliberals built the concept of legalization using the analytical tools developed by H. L. A. Hart to distinguish law from other mechanisms of social control, like power and morals. Within Hart’s theory, such tools have a normative function: theoretically rebuilding law as a system of rules that is independent from the will and the beliefs of those who interpret and apply legal rules. However, Hart’s resulting separation of legal texts from legal practice obscures important contributions that the analytical tradition in philosophy of language has made to the understanding of the relation between language and reality. Specifically, such a separation reduces law to simple forms and texts disregarding the extent to which legal practice gives meaning to legal texts. Adapting Hart’s conception of law to International Relations has at least one important methodological consequence: the formal analysis of treaties cannot explain the influence of international law over state behavior. To understand the influence of international law on state behavior, one must previously describe the relation between legal practice and the meaning of legal texts. Thus, a redefinition of neoliberal research agenda on legalization should focus on the way States and international courts construct the meaning of treaties and other international norms.
topic Legalización
relaciones internacionales
derecho internacional
justicia internacional
neoliberalismo institucional
instituciones internacionales
jurisprudencia internacional
política judicial
H. L. A. Hart
L. Wittgenstein
filosofía del lenguaje
url https://revistas.urosario.edu.co/index.php/desafios/article/view/656
work_keys_str_mv AT pabloruedasaiz haciaunavisiondinamicadelalegalizaciondelapoliticainternacionalrevisioncriticadelabibliografia
_version_ 1725377811744555008