Intertwining evidence- and model-based reasoning in physics sensemaking: An example from electrostatics

Our field has long valued the goal of teaching students not just the facts of physics, but also the thinking and reasoning skills of professional physicists. The complexity inherent in scientific reasoning demands that we think carefully about how we conceptualize for ourselves, enact in our classes...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rosemary S. Russ, Tor Ole B. Odden
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: American Physical Society 2017-08-01
Series:Physical Review Physics Education Research
Online Access:http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.13.020105
id doaj-e65fca4bfcb04d87b3e1cde7b10a3c5c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e65fca4bfcb04d87b3e1cde7b10a3c5c2020-11-24T23:03:24ZengAmerican Physical SocietyPhysical Review Physics Education Research2469-98962017-08-0113202010510.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.13.020105Intertwining evidence- and model-based reasoning in physics sensemaking: An example from electrostaticsRosemary S. RussTor Ole B. OddenOur field has long valued the goal of teaching students not just the facts of physics, but also the thinking and reasoning skills of professional physicists. The complexity inherent in scientific reasoning demands that we think carefully about how we conceptualize for ourselves, enact in our classes, and encourage in our students the relationship between the multifaceted practices of professional science. The current study draws on existing research in the philosophy of science and psychology to advocate for intertwining two important aspects of scientific reasoning: using evidence from experimentation and modeling. We present a case from an undergraduate physics course to illustrate how these aspects can be intertwined productively and describe specific ways in which these aspects of reasoning can mutually reinforce one another in student learning. We end by discussing implications for this work for instruction in introductory physics courses and for research on scientific reasoning at the undergraduate level.http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.13.020105
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Rosemary S. Russ
Tor Ole B. Odden
spellingShingle Rosemary S. Russ
Tor Ole B. Odden
Intertwining evidence- and model-based reasoning in physics sensemaking: An example from electrostatics
Physical Review Physics Education Research
author_facet Rosemary S. Russ
Tor Ole B. Odden
author_sort Rosemary S. Russ
title Intertwining evidence- and model-based reasoning in physics sensemaking: An example from electrostatics
title_short Intertwining evidence- and model-based reasoning in physics sensemaking: An example from electrostatics
title_full Intertwining evidence- and model-based reasoning in physics sensemaking: An example from electrostatics
title_fullStr Intertwining evidence- and model-based reasoning in physics sensemaking: An example from electrostatics
title_full_unstemmed Intertwining evidence- and model-based reasoning in physics sensemaking: An example from electrostatics
title_sort intertwining evidence- and model-based reasoning in physics sensemaking: an example from electrostatics
publisher American Physical Society
series Physical Review Physics Education Research
issn 2469-9896
publishDate 2017-08-01
description Our field has long valued the goal of teaching students not just the facts of physics, but also the thinking and reasoning skills of professional physicists. The complexity inherent in scientific reasoning demands that we think carefully about how we conceptualize for ourselves, enact in our classes, and encourage in our students the relationship between the multifaceted practices of professional science. The current study draws on existing research in the philosophy of science and psychology to advocate for intertwining two important aspects of scientific reasoning: using evidence from experimentation and modeling. We present a case from an undergraduate physics course to illustrate how these aspects can be intertwined productively and describe specific ways in which these aspects of reasoning can mutually reinforce one another in student learning. We end by discussing implications for this work for instruction in introductory physics courses and for research on scientific reasoning at the undergraduate level.
url http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.13.020105
work_keys_str_mv AT rosemarysruss intertwiningevidenceandmodelbasedreasoninginphysicssensemakinganexamplefromelectrostatics
AT torolebodden intertwiningevidenceandmodelbasedreasoninginphysicssensemakinganexamplefromelectrostatics
_version_ 1716375720147550208