Democracia e eficiência: a difícil relação entre política e economia no debate contemporâneo

<abstract language="eng">Democracy and efficiency: hard relations between politics and economy. Many economists see politics as an irrational activity. They also think state action usually generates market inefficiencies and democratic institutions, such as elections, often work as o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maria Rita Loureiro, Fernando Luiz Abrucio
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Editora 34 2012-12-01
Series:Brazilian Journal of Political Economy
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-31572012000400005
id doaj-e65c8d1873544564accb620f7b4ae9aa
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e65c8d1873544564accb620f7b4ae9aa2020-11-25T00:45:26ZengEditora 34Brazilian Journal of Political Economy0101-31571809-45382012-12-01324615633Democracia e eficiência: a difícil relação entre política e economia no debate contemporâneoMaria Rita LoureiroFernando Luiz Abrucio<abstract language="eng">Democracy and efficiency: hard relations between politics and economy. Many economists see politics as an irrational activity. They also think state action usually generates market inefficiencies and democratic institutions, such as elections, often work as obstacles to sound economic measures. Showing that vision has been embedded into the main currents of economic thought since the last century, we also argue those ideas are exported to great part of contemporary political science, including the area of public policies. Examining the literature, we show that rational choice political scientists, as the economists, claim governability and effective decisions will be guaranteed mainly through concentrated arenas or through insulated arrangements able to protect policy makers from political interference. In other words, governability depends on the reduction of the political arenas. On the contrary, we reject this technocratic solution of splitting politics from economy. With the support of classical pluralist thinkers, we stand another conception, arguing politics is the privileged social space for building interests and values in an institutionalized way. The difficulties to surpass current international crises since 2008 reveal this is a crucial problem: reducing politics would prevent societies from improving institutional solutions which are the only ones able to give space to emerging conflicts and, then, reach eventual consensus around them.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-31572012000400005democracyeconomic efficiencymainstream economicspolitical sciencerational choice theory
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Maria Rita Loureiro
Fernando Luiz Abrucio
spellingShingle Maria Rita Loureiro
Fernando Luiz Abrucio
Democracia e eficiência: a difícil relação entre política e economia no debate contemporâneo
Brazilian Journal of Political Economy
democracy
economic efficiency
mainstream economics
political science
rational choice theory
author_facet Maria Rita Loureiro
Fernando Luiz Abrucio
author_sort Maria Rita Loureiro
title Democracia e eficiência: a difícil relação entre política e economia no debate contemporâneo
title_short Democracia e eficiência: a difícil relação entre política e economia no debate contemporâneo
title_full Democracia e eficiência: a difícil relação entre política e economia no debate contemporâneo
title_fullStr Democracia e eficiência: a difícil relação entre política e economia no debate contemporâneo
title_full_unstemmed Democracia e eficiência: a difícil relação entre política e economia no debate contemporâneo
title_sort democracia e eficiência: a difícil relação entre política e economia no debate contemporâneo
publisher Editora 34
series Brazilian Journal of Political Economy
issn 0101-3157
1809-4538
publishDate 2012-12-01
description <abstract language="eng">Democracy and efficiency: hard relations between politics and economy. Many economists see politics as an irrational activity. They also think state action usually generates market inefficiencies and democratic institutions, such as elections, often work as obstacles to sound economic measures. Showing that vision has been embedded into the main currents of economic thought since the last century, we also argue those ideas are exported to great part of contemporary political science, including the area of public policies. Examining the literature, we show that rational choice political scientists, as the economists, claim governability and effective decisions will be guaranteed mainly through concentrated arenas or through insulated arrangements able to protect policy makers from political interference. In other words, governability depends on the reduction of the political arenas. On the contrary, we reject this technocratic solution of splitting politics from economy. With the support of classical pluralist thinkers, we stand another conception, arguing politics is the privileged social space for building interests and values in an institutionalized way. The difficulties to surpass current international crises since 2008 reveal this is a crucial problem: reducing politics would prevent societies from improving institutional solutions which are the only ones able to give space to emerging conflicts and, then, reach eventual consensus around them.
topic democracy
economic efficiency
mainstream economics
political science
rational choice theory
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-31572012000400005
work_keys_str_mv AT mariaritaloureiro democraciaeeficienciaadificilrelacaoentrepoliticaeeconomianodebatecontemporaneo
AT fernandoluizabrucio democraciaeeficienciaadificilrelacaoentrepoliticaeeconomianodebatecontemporaneo
_version_ 1725270165151547392