Modification of Conventional Drainage System Using Recharge Well

One of the popular recharge systems is a recharge well that directly receive rainwater from the roof of the house. In this study, recharge wells will be introduced and analyzed in a modification of conventional drainage. Area for this research was taken in Kimpulan Village, Sleman, Yogyakarta. Input...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sri Amini Yuni Astuti, Dinia Anggraheni
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2019-01-01
Series:MATEC Web of Conferences
Online Access:https://www.matec-conferences.org/articles/matecconf/pdf/2019/29/matecconf_icsbe2019_04017.pdf
id doaj-e64d0b2f17f5426284a3fe65594776b1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e64d0b2f17f5426284a3fe65594776b12021-03-02T09:21:42ZengEDP SciencesMATEC Web of Conferences2261-236X2019-01-012800401710.1051/matecconf/201928004017matecconf_icsbe2019_04017Modification of Conventional Drainage System Using Recharge WellSri Amini Yuni Astuti0Dinia AnggraheniCivil Engineering Study Program, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Planning, Universitas Islam IndonesiaOne of the popular recharge systems is a recharge well that directly receive rainwater from the roof of the house. In this study, recharge wells will be introduced and analyzed in a modification of conventional drainage. Area for this research was taken in Kimpulan Village, Sleman, Yogyakarta. Input discharge that enters the recharge well used free-flow formula through holes or pipes. The dimensions of recharge wells followed the Sunjoto’s formula, but with T is the time of concentration, not the duration of the dominant rainfall. The result of this study showed that recharge well reduced the maximum discharge and dimensions of the channel. The reduction depends on the diameter of the connecting pipe, the height difference of the water level, depth of groundwater and permeability of the soil in the area. If a diameter pipe of 20 cm and a height difference of 1 m are used, it reduced the runoff discharge more than 17.3%. For the study area, it was not feasible to build additional recharge wells, because it required a large number of wells, approximately 58 pieces, due to very small soil permeability of 3.5.10-5 m/s.https://www.matec-conferences.org/articles/matecconf/pdf/2019/29/matecconf_icsbe2019_04017.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sri Amini Yuni Astuti
Dinia Anggraheni
spellingShingle Sri Amini Yuni Astuti
Dinia Anggraheni
Modification of Conventional Drainage System Using Recharge Well
MATEC Web of Conferences
author_facet Sri Amini Yuni Astuti
Dinia Anggraheni
author_sort Sri Amini Yuni Astuti
title Modification of Conventional Drainage System Using Recharge Well
title_short Modification of Conventional Drainage System Using Recharge Well
title_full Modification of Conventional Drainage System Using Recharge Well
title_fullStr Modification of Conventional Drainage System Using Recharge Well
title_full_unstemmed Modification of Conventional Drainage System Using Recharge Well
title_sort modification of conventional drainage system using recharge well
publisher EDP Sciences
series MATEC Web of Conferences
issn 2261-236X
publishDate 2019-01-01
description One of the popular recharge systems is a recharge well that directly receive rainwater from the roof of the house. In this study, recharge wells will be introduced and analyzed in a modification of conventional drainage. Area for this research was taken in Kimpulan Village, Sleman, Yogyakarta. Input discharge that enters the recharge well used free-flow formula through holes or pipes. The dimensions of recharge wells followed the Sunjoto’s formula, but with T is the time of concentration, not the duration of the dominant rainfall. The result of this study showed that recharge well reduced the maximum discharge and dimensions of the channel. The reduction depends on the diameter of the connecting pipe, the height difference of the water level, depth of groundwater and permeability of the soil in the area. If a diameter pipe of 20 cm and a height difference of 1 m are used, it reduced the runoff discharge more than 17.3%. For the study area, it was not feasible to build additional recharge wells, because it required a large number of wells, approximately 58 pieces, due to very small soil permeability of 3.5.10-5 m/s.
url https://www.matec-conferences.org/articles/matecconf/pdf/2019/29/matecconf_icsbe2019_04017.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT sriaminiyuniastuti modificationofconventionaldrainagesystemusingrechargewell
AT diniaanggraheni modificationofconventionaldrainagesystemusingrechargewell
_version_ 1724239564419104768