Michelangelo’s principles or Panofsky’s? Review of: Michelangelo’s Design Principles, Particularly in Relation to Those of Raphael by Erwin Panofsky, edited by Gerda Panofsky, translated by Joseph Spooner, Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2020
The discovery in 2012 of Erwin Panofsky’s Habilitation thesis on Michelangelo is just short of sensational. The thesis, written for the Faculty of Philosophy of the University of Hamburg in 1919-20, ambitiously sets out to define the fundamental design principles of Michelangelo’s art, especially a...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Department of Art History, University of Birmingham
2020-12-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Art Historiography |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://arthistoriography.files.wordpress.com/2020/09/wallace-rev.pdf |
| id |
doaj-e649630be7904841814cb980e4205035 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
Article |
| spelling |
doaj-e649630be7904841814cb980e42050352021-01-28T13:03:50ZengDepartment of Art History, University of BirminghamJournal of Art Historiography2042-47522020-12-012323WW3Michelangelo’s principles or Panofsky’s? Review of: Michelangelo’s Design Principles, Particularly in Relation to Those of Raphael by Erwin Panofsky, edited by Gerda Panofsky, translated by Joseph Spooner, Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2020William E. Wallace0Washington University in St. LouisThe discovery in 2012 of Erwin Panofsky’s Habilitation thesis on Michelangelo is just short of sensational. The thesis, written for the Faculty of Philosophy of the University of Hamburg in 1919-20, ambitiously sets out to define the fundamental design principles of Michelangelo’s art, especially as they can be articulated in contradistinction to the art of Raphael. The thesis, published in a luxurious facsimile German edition in 2014, now appears in an English translation permitting Anglo-Saxon readers the welcome opportunity to observe the maturing of one of the great figures of Art and Intellectual History.https://arthistoriography.files.wordpress.com/2020/09/wallace-rev.pdfcubic thinking/constraintdesign principleshabilitationsschrifthabilitation thesismichelangeloerwin panofskygerda panofskyplane/planar nature |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| language |
English |
| format |
Article |
| sources |
DOAJ |
| author |
William E. Wallace |
| spellingShingle |
William E. Wallace Michelangelo’s principles or Panofsky’s? Review of: Michelangelo’s Design Principles, Particularly in Relation to Those of Raphael by Erwin Panofsky, edited by Gerda Panofsky, translated by Joseph Spooner, Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2020 Journal of Art Historiography cubic thinking/constraint design principles habilitationsschrift habilitation thesis michelangelo erwin panofsky gerda panofsky plane/planar nature |
| author_facet |
William E. Wallace |
| author_sort |
William E. Wallace |
| title |
Michelangelo’s principles or Panofsky’s? Review of: Michelangelo’s Design Principles, Particularly in Relation to Those of Raphael by Erwin Panofsky, edited by Gerda Panofsky, translated by Joseph Spooner, Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2020 |
| title_short |
Michelangelo’s principles or Panofsky’s? Review of: Michelangelo’s Design Principles, Particularly in Relation to Those of Raphael by Erwin Panofsky, edited by Gerda Panofsky, translated by Joseph Spooner, Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2020 |
| title_full |
Michelangelo’s principles or Panofsky’s? Review of: Michelangelo’s Design Principles, Particularly in Relation to Those of Raphael by Erwin Panofsky, edited by Gerda Panofsky, translated by Joseph Spooner, Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2020 |
| title_fullStr |
Michelangelo’s principles or Panofsky’s? Review of: Michelangelo’s Design Principles, Particularly in Relation to Those of Raphael by Erwin Panofsky, edited by Gerda Panofsky, translated by Joseph Spooner, Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2020 |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Michelangelo’s principles or Panofsky’s? Review of: Michelangelo’s Design Principles, Particularly in Relation to Those of Raphael by Erwin Panofsky, edited by Gerda Panofsky, translated by Joseph Spooner, Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2020 |
| title_sort |
michelangelo’s principles or panofsky’s? review of: michelangelo’s design principles, particularly in relation to those of raphael by erwin panofsky, edited by gerda panofsky, translated by joseph spooner, princeton and oxford: princeton university press, 2020 |
| publisher |
Department of Art History, University of Birmingham |
| series |
Journal of Art Historiography |
| issn |
2042-4752 |
| publishDate |
2020-12-01 |
| description |
The discovery in 2012 of Erwin Panofsky’s Habilitation thesis on Michelangelo is just short of sensational. The thesis, written for the Faculty of Philosophy of the University of Hamburg in 1919-20, ambitiously sets out to define the fundamental design principles of Michelangelo’s art, especially as they can be articulated in contradistinction to the art of Raphael. The thesis, published in a luxurious facsimile German edition in 2014, now appears in an English translation permitting Anglo-Saxon readers the welcome opportunity to observe the maturing of one of the great figures of Art and Intellectual History. |
| topic |
cubic thinking/constraint design principles habilitationsschrift habilitation thesis michelangelo erwin panofsky gerda panofsky plane/planar nature |
| url |
https://arthistoriography.files.wordpress.com/2020/09/wallace-rev.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT williamewallace michelangelosprinciplesorpanofskysreviewofmichelangelosdesignprinciplesparticularlyinrelationtothoseofraphaelbyerwinpanofskyeditedbygerdapanofskytranslatedbyjosephspoonerprincetonandoxfordprincetonuniversitypress2020 |
| _version_ |
1724319760451108864 |