An lnvestigation of Princapals' Use of Data in Data-Driven Decision-Making and the Impact on Student Achievement

The passage and implementation of the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB, 2001) ushered in a new era of educational accountability and school improvement. Schools are held accountable to meet adequate yearly progress that requires educators to closely monitor student performance on high-stake assessment...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jimmy K. Byrd, Colleen Eddy
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Ralph W. Steen Library, Stephen F. Austin State University 2010-10-01
Series:School Leadership Review
Online Access:https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1120&context=slr
id doaj-e633523d3f7f454cb9f29130eb65643d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e633523d3f7f454cb9f29130eb65643d2020-11-25T01:46:08ZengRalph W. Steen Library, Stephen F. Austin State UniversitySchool Leadership Review1559-49982010-10-01526593An lnvestigation of Princapals' Use of Data in Data-Driven Decision-Making and the Impact on Student AchievementJimmy K. Byrd0Colleen Eddy1University of North TexasUniversity of North TexasThe passage and implementation of the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB, 2001) ushered in a new era of educational accountability and school improvement. Schools are held accountable to meet adequate yearly progress that requires educators to closely monitor student performance on high-stake assessments. Further, NCLB significantly increases the pressure on states, districts and schools to collect, analyze and report data. Accountability demands are increasingly forcing school leaders to explore student-level data and to complete more sophisticated analyses. Data-driven decision-making (DDDM) has become an emerging field of practice for school leadership (Streifer, 2002) and a central focus of education policy and practice (Mandinach, Honey, & Light, 2006). Nationwide standards-based control and outcome-based funding have brought DDDM to the top of every principal's agenda (Leithwood, Aitken, & Jantzi, 2001).https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1120&context=slr
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jimmy K. Byrd
Colleen Eddy
spellingShingle Jimmy K. Byrd
Colleen Eddy
An lnvestigation of Princapals' Use of Data in Data-Driven Decision-Making and the Impact on Student Achievement
School Leadership Review
author_facet Jimmy K. Byrd
Colleen Eddy
author_sort Jimmy K. Byrd
title An lnvestigation of Princapals' Use of Data in Data-Driven Decision-Making and the Impact on Student Achievement
title_short An lnvestigation of Princapals' Use of Data in Data-Driven Decision-Making and the Impact on Student Achievement
title_full An lnvestigation of Princapals' Use of Data in Data-Driven Decision-Making and the Impact on Student Achievement
title_fullStr An lnvestigation of Princapals' Use of Data in Data-Driven Decision-Making and the Impact on Student Achievement
title_full_unstemmed An lnvestigation of Princapals' Use of Data in Data-Driven Decision-Making and the Impact on Student Achievement
title_sort lnvestigation of princapals' use of data in data-driven decision-making and the impact on student achievement
publisher Ralph W. Steen Library, Stephen F. Austin State University
series School Leadership Review
issn 1559-4998
publishDate 2010-10-01
description The passage and implementation of the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB, 2001) ushered in a new era of educational accountability and school improvement. Schools are held accountable to meet adequate yearly progress that requires educators to closely monitor student performance on high-stake assessments. Further, NCLB significantly increases the pressure on states, districts and schools to collect, analyze and report data. Accountability demands are increasingly forcing school leaders to explore student-level data and to complete more sophisticated analyses. Data-driven decision-making (DDDM) has become an emerging field of practice for school leadership (Streifer, 2002) and a central focus of education policy and practice (Mandinach, Honey, & Light, 2006). Nationwide standards-based control and outcome-based funding have brought DDDM to the top of every principal's agenda (Leithwood, Aitken, & Jantzi, 2001).
url https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1120&context=slr
work_keys_str_mv AT jimmykbyrd anlnvestigationofprincapalsuseofdataindatadrivendecisionmakingandtheimpactonstudentachievement
AT colleeneddy anlnvestigationofprincapalsuseofdataindatadrivendecisionmakingandtheimpactonstudentachievement
AT jimmykbyrd lnvestigationofprincapalsuseofdataindatadrivendecisionmakingandtheimpactonstudentachievement
AT colleeneddy lnvestigationofprincapalsuseofdataindatadrivendecisionmakingandtheimpactonstudentachievement
_version_ 1725020730527055872