Touching and Hearing Unseen Objects: Multisensory Effects on Scene Recognition

In three experiments, we investigated the influence of object-specific sounds on haptic scene recognition without vision. Blindfolded participants had to recognize, through touch, spatial scenes comprising six objects that were placed on a round platform. Critically, in half of the trials, object-sp...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Simon J. Hazenberg, Rob van Lier
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2016-08-01
Series:i-Perception
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2041669516664530
id doaj-e620275cd34247889e5ab7b797b481e7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e620275cd34247889e5ab7b797b481e72020-11-25T03:06:42ZengSAGE Publishingi-Perception2041-66952016-08-01710.1177/204166951666453010.1177_2041669516664530Touching and Hearing Unseen Objects: Multisensory Effects on Scene RecognitionSimon J. HazenbergRob van LierIn three experiments, we investigated the influence of object-specific sounds on haptic scene recognition without vision. Blindfolded participants had to recognize, through touch, spatial scenes comprising six objects that were placed on a round platform. Critically, in half of the trials, object-specific sounds were played when objects were touched (bimodal condition), while sounds were turned off in the other half of the trials (unimodal condition). After first exploring the scene, two objects were swapped and the task was to report, which of the objects swapped positions. In Experiment 1, geometrical objects and simple sounds were used, while in Experiment 2, the objects comprised toy animals that were matched with semantically compatible animal sounds. In Experiment 3, we replicated Experiment 1, but now a tactile-auditory object identification task preceded the experiment in which the participants learned to identify the objects based on tactile and auditory input. For each experiment, the results revealed a significant performance increase only after the switch from bimodal to unimodal. Thus, it appears that the release of bimodal identification, from audio-tactile to tactile-only produces a benefit that is not achieved when having the reversed order in which sound was added after having experience with haptic-only. We conclude that task-related factors other than mere bimodal identification cause the facilitation when switching from bimodal to unimodal conditions.https://doi.org/10.1177/2041669516664530
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Simon J. Hazenberg
Rob van Lier
spellingShingle Simon J. Hazenberg
Rob van Lier
Touching and Hearing Unseen Objects: Multisensory Effects on Scene Recognition
i-Perception
author_facet Simon J. Hazenberg
Rob van Lier
author_sort Simon J. Hazenberg
title Touching and Hearing Unseen Objects: Multisensory Effects on Scene Recognition
title_short Touching and Hearing Unseen Objects: Multisensory Effects on Scene Recognition
title_full Touching and Hearing Unseen Objects: Multisensory Effects on Scene Recognition
title_fullStr Touching and Hearing Unseen Objects: Multisensory Effects on Scene Recognition
title_full_unstemmed Touching and Hearing Unseen Objects: Multisensory Effects on Scene Recognition
title_sort touching and hearing unseen objects: multisensory effects on scene recognition
publisher SAGE Publishing
series i-Perception
issn 2041-6695
publishDate 2016-08-01
description In three experiments, we investigated the influence of object-specific sounds on haptic scene recognition without vision. Blindfolded participants had to recognize, through touch, spatial scenes comprising six objects that were placed on a round platform. Critically, in half of the trials, object-specific sounds were played when objects were touched (bimodal condition), while sounds were turned off in the other half of the trials (unimodal condition). After first exploring the scene, two objects were swapped and the task was to report, which of the objects swapped positions. In Experiment 1, geometrical objects and simple sounds were used, while in Experiment 2, the objects comprised toy animals that were matched with semantically compatible animal sounds. In Experiment 3, we replicated Experiment 1, but now a tactile-auditory object identification task preceded the experiment in which the participants learned to identify the objects based on tactile and auditory input. For each experiment, the results revealed a significant performance increase only after the switch from bimodal to unimodal. Thus, it appears that the release of bimodal identification, from audio-tactile to tactile-only produces a benefit that is not achieved when having the reversed order in which sound was added after having experience with haptic-only. We conclude that task-related factors other than mere bimodal identification cause the facilitation when switching from bimodal to unimodal conditions.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2041669516664530
work_keys_str_mv AT simonjhazenberg touchingandhearingunseenobjectsmultisensoryeffectsonscenerecognition
AT robvanlier touchingandhearingunseenobjectsmultisensoryeffectsonscenerecognition
_version_ 1724673042406178816