Touching and Hearing Unseen Objects: Multisensory Effects on Scene Recognition
In three experiments, we investigated the influence of object-specific sounds on haptic scene recognition without vision. Blindfolded participants had to recognize, through touch, spatial scenes comprising six objects that were placed on a round platform. Critically, in half of the trials, object-sp...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2016-08-01
|
Series: | i-Perception |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/2041669516664530 |
id |
doaj-e620275cd34247889e5ab7b797b481e7 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-e620275cd34247889e5ab7b797b481e72020-11-25T03:06:42ZengSAGE Publishingi-Perception2041-66952016-08-01710.1177/204166951666453010.1177_2041669516664530Touching and Hearing Unseen Objects: Multisensory Effects on Scene RecognitionSimon J. HazenbergRob van LierIn three experiments, we investigated the influence of object-specific sounds on haptic scene recognition without vision. Blindfolded participants had to recognize, through touch, spatial scenes comprising six objects that were placed on a round platform. Critically, in half of the trials, object-specific sounds were played when objects were touched (bimodal condition), while sounds were turned off in the other half of the trials (unimodal condition). After first exploring the scene, two objects were swapped and the task was to report, which of the objects swapped positions. In Experiment 1, geometrical objects and simple sounds were used, while in Experiment 2, the objects comprised toy animals that were matched with semantically compatible animal sounds. In Experiment 3, we replicated Experiment 1, but now a tactile-auditory object identification task preceded the experiment in which the participants learned to identify the objects based on tactile and auditory input. For each experiment, the results revealed a significant performance increase only after the switch from bimodal to unimodal. Thus, it appears that the release of bimodal identification, from audio-tactile to tactile-only produces a benefit that is not achieved when having the reversed order in which sound was added after having experience with haptic-only. We conclude that task-related factors other than mere bimodal identification cause the facilitation when switching from bimodal to unimodal conditions.https://doi.org/10.1177/2041669516664530 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Simon J. Hazenberg Rob van Lier |
spellingShingle |
Simon J. Hazenberg Rob van Lier Touching and Hearing Unseen Objects: Multisensory Effects on Scene Recognition i-Perception |
author_facet |
Simon J. Hazenberg Rob van Lier |
author_sort |
Simon J. Hazenberg |
title |
Touching and Hearing Unseen Objects: Multisensory Effects on Scene Recognition |
title_short |
Touching and Hearing Unseen Objects: Multisensory Effects on Scene Recognition |
title_full |
Touching and Hearing Unseen Objects: Multisensory Effects on Scene Recognition |
title_fullStr |
Touching and Hearing Unseen Objects: Multisensory Effects on Scene Recognition |
title_full_unstemmed |
Touching and Hearing Unseen Objects: Multisensory Effects on Scene Recognition |
title_sort |
touching and hearing unseen objects: multisensory effects on scene recognition |
publisher |
SAGE Publishing |
series |
i-Perception |
issn |
2041-6695 |
publishDate |
2016-08-01 |
description |
In three experiments, we investigated the influence of object-specific sounds on haptic scene recognition without vision. Blindfolded participants had to recognize, through touch, spatial scenes comprising six objects that were placed on a round platform. Critically, in half of the trials, object-specific sounds were played when objects were touched (bimodal condition), while sounds were turned off in the other half of the trials (unimodal condition). After first exploring the scene, two objects were swapped and the task was to report, which of the objects swapped positions. In Experiment 1, geometrical objects and simple sounds were used, while in Experiment 2, the objects comprised toy animals that were matched with semantically compatible animal sounds. In Experiment 3, we replicated Experiment 1, but now a tactile-auditory object identification task preceded the experiment in which the participants learned to identify the objects based on tactile and auditory input. For each experiment, the results revealed a significant performance increase only after the switch from bimodal to unimodal. Thus, it appears that the release of bimodal identification, from audio-tactile to tactile-only produces a benefit that is not achieved when having the reversed order in which sound was added after having experience with haptic-only. We conclude that task-related factors other than mere bimodal identification cause the facilitation when switching from bimodal to unimodal conditions. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1177/2041669516664530 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT simonjhazenberg touchingandhearingunseenobjectsmultisensoryeffectsonscenerecognition AT robvanlier touchingandhearingunseenobjectsmultisensoryeffectsonscenerecognition |
_version_ |
1724673042406178816 |