Two-Item Fall Screening Tool Identifies Older Adults at Increased Risk of Falling after Emergency Department Visit

Introduction: Few emergency department (ED)-specific fall-risk screening tools exist. The goals of this study were to externally validate Tiedemann et al’s two-item, ED-specific fall screening tool and test handgrip strength to determine their ability to predict future falls. We hypothesized that bo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Christopher J. Solie, Morgan B. Swanson, Kari Harland, Christopher Blum, Kevin Kin, Nicholas Mohr
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: eScholarship Publishing, University of California 2020-08-01
Series:Western Journal of Emergency Medicine
Online Access:https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6wc4617n
id doaj-e6175861ed9e48839d61a4527d349ca5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e6175861ed9e48839d61a4527d349ca52020-11-25T03:30:22ZengeScholarship Publishing, University of CaliforniaWestern Journal of Emergency Medicine1936-90182020-08-0121510.5811/westjem.2020.5.46991wjem-21-1275Two-Item Fall Screening Tool Identifies Older Adults at Increased Risk of Falling after Emergency Department VisitChristopher J. SolieMorgan B. SwansonKari HarlandChristopher BlumKevin KinNicholas MohrIntroduction: Few emergency department (ED)-specific fall-risk screening tools exist. The goals of this study were to externally validate Tiedemann et al’s two-item, ED-specific fall screening tool and test handgrip strength to determine their ability to predict future falls. We hypothesized that both the two-item fall screening and handgrip strength would identify older adults at increased risk of falling. Methods: A convenience sample of patients ages 65 and older presenting to a single-center academic ED were enrolled. Patients were asked screening questions and had their handgrip strength measured during their ED visit. Patients were given one point if they answered “yes” to “Are you taking six or more medications?” and two points for answering “yes” to “Have you had two or more falls in the past year?” to give a cumulative score from 0 to 3. Participants had monthly follow- ups, via postcard questionnaires, for six months after their ED visit. We performed sensitivity and specificity analyses, and used likelihood ratios and frequencies to assess the relationship between risk factors and falls, fall-related injury, and death. Results: In this study, 247 participants were enrolled with 143 participants completing follow-up (58%). During the six-month follow-up period, 34% of participants had at least one fall and 30 patients died (12.1%). Fall rates for individual Tiedemann scores were 14.3%, 33.3%, 60.0% and 72.2% for scores of 0,1, 2 and 3, respectively. Low handgrip strength was associated with a higher proportion of falls (46.3%), but had poor sensitivity (52.1%). Conclusion: Handgrip strength was not sensitive in screening older adults for future falls. The Tiedemann rule differentiated older adults who were at high risk for future falls from low risk individuals, and can be considered by EDs wanting to screen older adults for future fall risk.https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6wc4617n
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Christopher J. Solie
Morgan B. Swanson
Kari Harland
Christopher Blum
Kevin Kin
Nicholas Mohr
spellingShingle Christopher J. Solie
Morgan B. Swanson
Kari Harland
Christopher Blum
Kevin Kin
Nicholas Mohr
Two-Item Fall Screening Tool Identifies Older Adults at Increased Risk of Falling after Emergency Department Visit
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine
author_facet Christopher J. Solie
Morgan B. Swanson
Kari Harland
Christopher Blum
Kevin Kin
Nicholas Mohr
author_sort Christopher J. Solie
title Two-Item Fall Screening Tool Identifies Older Adults at Increased Risk of Falling after Emergency Department Visit
title_short Two-Item Fall Screening Tool Identifies Older Adults at Increased Risk of Falling after Emergency Department Visit
title_full Two-Item Fall Screening Tool Identifies Older Adults at Increased Risk of Falling after Emergency Department Visit
title_fullStr Two-Item Fall Screening Tool Identifies Older Adults at Increased Risk of Falling after Emergency Department Visit
title_full_unstemmed Two-Item Fall Screening Tool Identifies Older Adults at Increased Risk of Falling after Emergency Department Visit
title_sort two-item fall screening tool identifies older adults at increased risk of falling after emergency department visit
publisher eScholarship Publishing, University of California
series Western Journal of Emergency Medicine
issn 1936-9018
publishDate 2020-08-01
description Introduction: Few emergency department (ED)-specific fall-risk screening tools exist. The goals of this study were to externally validate Tiedemann et al’s two-item, ED-specific fall screening tool and test handgrip strength to determine their ability to predict future falls. We hypothesized that both the two-item fall screening and handgrip strength would identify older adults at increased risk of falling. Methods: A convenience sample of patients ages 65 and older presenting to a single-center academic ED were enrolled. Patients were asked screening questions and had their handgrip strength measured during their ED visit. Patients were given one point if they answered “yes” to “Are you taking six or more medications?” and two points for answering “yes” to “Have you had two or more falls in the past year?” to give a cumulative score from 0 to 3. Participants had monthly follow- ups, via postcard questionnaires, for six months after their ED visit. We performed sensitivity and specificity analyses, and used likelihood ratios and frequencies to assess the relationship between risk factors and falls, fall-related injury, and death. Results: In this study, 247 participants were enrolled with 143 participants completing follow-up (58%). During the six-month follow-up period, 34% of participants had at least one fall and 30 patients died (12.1%). Fall rates for individual Tiedemann scores were 14.3%, 33.3%, 60.0% and 72.2% for scores of 0,1, 2 and 3, respectively. Low handgrip strength was associated with a higher proportion of falls (46.3%), but had poor sensitivity (52.1%). Conclusion: Handgrip strength was not sensitive in screening older adults for future falls. The Tiedemann rule differentiated older adults who were at high risk for future falls from low risk individuals, and can be considered by EDs wanting to screen older adults for future fall risk.
url https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6wc4617n
work_keys_str_mv AT christopherjsolie twoitemfallscreeningtoolidentifiesolderadultsatincreasedriskoffallingafteremergencydepartmentvisit
AT morganbswanson twoitemfallscreeningtoolidentifiesolderadultsatincreasedriskoffallingafteremergencydepartmentvisit
AT kariharland twoitemfallscreeningtoolidentifiesolderadultsatincreasedriskoffallingafteremergencydepartmentvisit
AT christopherblum twoitemfallscreeningtoolidentifiesolderadultsatincreasedriskoffallingafteremergencydepartmentvisit
AT kevinkin twoitemfallscreeningtoolidentifiesolderadultsatincreasedriskoffallingafteremergencydepartmentvisit
AT nicholasmohr twoitemfallscreeningtoolidentifiesolderadultsatincreasedriskoffallingafteremergencydepartmentvisit
_version_ 1724575948204933120