Two-Item Fall Screening Tool Identifies Older Adults at Increased Risk of Falling after Emergency Department Visit
Introduction: Few emergency department (ED)-specific fall-risk screening tools exist. The goals of this study were to externally validate Tiedemann et al’s two-item, ED-specific fall screening tool and test handgrip strength to determine their ability to predict future falls. We hypothesized that bo...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
eScholarship Publishing, University of California
2020-08-01
|
Series: | Western Journal of Emergency Medicine |
Online Access: | https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6wc4617n |
id |
doaj-e6175861ed9e48839d61a4527d349ca5 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-e6175861ed9e48839d61a4527d349ca52020-11-25T03:30:22ZengeScholarship Publishing, University of CaliforniaWestern Journal of Emergency Medicine1936-90182020-08-0121510.5811/westjem.2020.5.46991wjem-21-1275Two-Item Fall Screening Tool Identifies Older Adults at Increased Risk of Falling after Emergency Department VisitChristopher J. SolieMorgan B. SwansonKari HarlandChristopher BlumKevin KinNicholas MohrIntroduction: Few emergency department (ED)-specific fall-risk screening tools exist. The goals of this study were to externally validate Tiedemann et al’s two-item, ED-specific fall screening tool and test handgrip strength to determine their ability to predict future falls. We hypothesized that both the two-item fall screening and handgrip strength would identify older adults at increased risk of falling. Methods: A convenience sample of patients ages 65 and older presenting to a single-center academic ED were enrolled. Patients were asked screening questions and had their handgrip strength measured during their ED visit. Patients were given one point if they answered “yes” to “Are you taking six or more medications?” and two points for answering “yes” to “Have you had two or more falls in the past year?” to give a cumulative score from 0 to 3. Participants had monthly follow- ups, via postcard questionnaires, for six months after their ED visit. We performed sensitivity and specificity analyses, and used likelihood ratios and frequencies to assess the relationship between risk factors and falls, fall-related injury, and death. Results: In this study, 247 participants were enrolled with 143 participants completing follow-up (58%). During the six-month follow-up period, 34% of participants had at least one fall and 30 patients died (12.1%). Fall rates for individual Tiedemann scores were 14.3%, 33.3%, 60.0% and 72.2% for scores of 0,1, 2 and 3, respectively. Low handgrip strength was associated with a higher proportion of falls (46.3%), but had poor sensitivity (52.1%). Conclusion: Handgrip strength was not sensitive in screening older adults for future falls. The Tiedemann rule differentiated older adults who were at high risk for future falls from low risk individuals, and can be considered by EDs wanting to screen older adults for future fall risk.https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6wc4617n |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Christopher J. Solie Morgan B. Swanson Kari Harland Christopher Blum Kevin Kin Nicholas Mohr |
spellingShingle |
Christopher J. Solie Morgan B. Swanson Kari Harland Christopher Blum Kevin Kin Nicholas Mohr Two-Item Fall Screening Tool Identifies Older Adults at Increased Risk of Falling after Emergency Department Visit Western Journal of Emergency Medicine |
author_facet |
Christopher J. Solie Morgan B. Swanson Kari Harland Christopher Blum Kevin Kin Nicholas Mohr |
author_sort |
Christopher J. Solie |
title |
Two-Item Fall Screening Tool Identifies Older Adults at Increased Risk of Falling after Emergency Department Visit |
title_short |
Two-Item Fall Screening Tool Identifies Older Adults at Increased Risk of Falling after Emergency Department Visit |
title_full |
Two-Item Fall Screening Tool Identifies Older Adults at Increased Risk of Falling after Emergency Department Visit |
title_fullStr |
Two-Item Fall Screening Tool Identifies Older Adults at Increased Risk of Falling after Emergency Department Visit |
title_full_unstemmed |
Two-Item Fall Screening Tool Identifies Older Adults at Increased Risk of Falling after Emergency Department Visit |
title_sort |
two-item fall screening tool identifies older adults at increased risk of falling after emergency department visit |
publisher |
eScholarship Publishing, University of California |
series |
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine |
issn |
1936-9018 |
publishDate |
2020-08-01 |
description |
Introduction: Few emergency department (ED)-specific fall-risk screening tools exist. The goals of this study were to externally validate Tiedemann et al’s two-item, ED-specific fall screening tool and test handgrip strength to determine their ability to predict future falls. We hypothesized that both the two-item fall screening and handgrip strength would identify older adults at increased risk of falling. Methods: A convenience sample of patients ages 65 and older presenting to a single-center academic ED were enrolled. Patients were asked screening questions and had their handgrip strength measured during their ED visit. Patients were given one point if they answered “yes” to “Are you taking six or more medications?” and two points for answering “yes” to “Have you had two or more falls in the past year?” to give a cumulative score from 0 to 3. Participants had monthly follow- ups, via postcard questionnaires, for six months after their ED visit. We performed sensitivity and specificity analyses, and used likelihood ratios and frequencies to assess the relationship between risk factors and falls, fall-related injury, and death. Results: In this study, 247 participants were enrolled with 143 participants completing follow-up (58%). During the six-month follow-up period, 34% of participants had at least one fall and 30 patients died (12.1%). Fall rates for individual Tiedemann scores were 14.3%, 33.3%, 60.0% and 72.2% for scores of 0,1, 2 and 3, respectively. Low handgrip strength was associated with a higher proportion of falls (46.3%), but had poor sensitivity (52.1%). Conclusion: Handgrip strength was not sensitive in screening older adults for future falls. The Tiedemann rule differentiated older adults who were at high risk for future falls from low risk individuals, and can be considered by EDs wanting to screen older adults for future fall risk. |
url |
https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6wc4617n |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT christopherjsolie twoitemfallscreeningtoolidentifiesolderadultsatincreasedriskoffallingafteremergencydepartmentvisit AT morganbswanson twoitemfallscreeningtoolidentifiesolderadultsatincreasedriskoffallingafteremergencydepartmentvisit AT kariharland twoitemfallscreeningtoolidentifiesolderadultsatincreasedriskoffallingafteremergencydepartmentvisit AT christopherblum twoitemfallscreeningtoolidentifiesolderadultsatincreasedriskoffallingafteremergencydepartmentvisit AT kevinkin twoitemfallscreeningtoolidentifiesolderadultsatincreasedriskoffallingafteremergencydepartmentvisit AT nicholasmohr twoitemfallscreeningtoolidentifiesolderadultsatincreasedriskoffallingafteremergencydepartmentvisit |
_version_ |
1724575948204933120 |