A generic multi‐period optimal power flow framework for combating operational constraints via residential flexibility resources

Abstract In low voltage networks, the majority of distributed energy resources are customer owned. As such, it is harder for the distribution system operator to control its system and maintain acceptable operating conditions. Even if residential flexibility is available, it should be employed withou...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Iason I. Avramidis, Florin Capitanescu, Geert Deconinck
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-01-01
Series:IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1049/gtd2.12022
id doaj-e608bef44b934f1aa1eb41a71d553c1f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e608bef44b934f1aa1eb41a71d553c1f2021-07-14T13:20:09ZengWileyIET Generation, Transmission & Distribution1751-86871751-86952021-01-0115230632010.1049/gtd2.12022A generic multi‐period optimal power flow framework for combating operational constraints via residential flexibility resourcesIason I. Avramidis0Florin Capitanescu1Geert Deconinck2Luxembourg Institute of Research and Technology (LIST) Belvaux LuxembourgLuxembourg Institute of Research and Technology (LIST) Belvaux LuxembourgESAT‐Electa KU Leuven Leuven BelgiumAbstract In low voltage networks, the majority of distributed energy resources are customer owned. As such, it is harder for the distribution system operator to control its system and maintain acceptable operating conditions. Even if residential flexibility is available, it should be employed without significant disturbances to customer‐driven device profile patterns. Here a generic tool is developed to assist the distribution system operator in making informed decisions regarding its best course of action to combat operational issues with a limited amount of customer‐driven flexibility. The proposed tool relies on a novel and versatile multi‐period optimal power flow model for centralised control of low voltage distribution systems. Various scenarios of flexibility resources controllability are examined, coupled with a number of novel modelling approaches and customer‐driven restrictions for the distribution system operator. For most scenarios, the multi‐period optimal power flow model is amenable to nonlinear programming (NLP) problems, though there are cases that end up as mixed‐integer nonlinear programming (MINLP) problems. For the latter, a heuristic approach is employed to approximate the MINLP into a sequence of size‐decreasing mixed‐integer linear programming (MILP) and a final NLP problem. The proposed formulation and approximation are applied to two low voltage networks of 18 nodes and 308 nodes, respectively.https://doi.org/10.1049/gtd2.12022
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Iason I. Avramidis
Florin Capitanescu
Geert Deconinck
spellingShingle Iason I. Avramidis
Florin Capitanescu
Geert Deconinck
A generic multi‐period optimal power flow framework for combating operational constraints via residential flexibility resources
IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution
author_facet Iason I. Avramidis
Florin Capitanescu
Geert Deconinck
author_sort Iason I. Avramidis
title A generic multi‐period optimal power flow framework for combating operational constraints via residential flexibility resources
title_short A generic multi‐period optimal power flow framework for combating operational constraints via residential flexibility resources
title_full A generic multi‐period optimal power flow framework for combating operational constraints via residential flexibility resources
title_fullStr A generic multi‐period optimal power flow framework for combating operational constraints via residential flexibility resources
title_full_unstemmed A generic multi‐period optimal power flow framework for combating operational constraints via residential flexibility resources
title_sort generic multi‐period optimal power flow framework for combating operational constraints via residential flexibility resources
publisher Wiley
series IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution
issn 1751-8687
1751-8695
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Abstract In low voltage networks, the majority of distributed energy resources are customer owned. As such, it is harder for the distribution system operator to control its system and maintain acceptable operating conditions. Even if residential flexibility is available, it should be employed without significant disturbances to customer‐driven device profile patterns. Here a generic tool is developed to assist the distribution system operator in making informed decisions regarding its best course of action to combat operational issues with a limited amount of customer‐driven flexibility. The proposed tool relies on a novel and versatile multi‐period optimal power flow model for centralised control of low voltage distribution systems. Various scenarios of flexibility resources controllability are examined, coupled with a number of novel modelling approaches and customer‐driven restrictions for the distribution system operator. For most scenarios, the multi‐period optimal power flow model is amenable to nonlinear programming (NLP) problems, though there are cases that end up as mixed‐integer nonlinear programming (MINLP) problems. For the latter, a heuristic approach is employed to approximate the MINLP into a sequence of size‐decreasing mixed‐integer linear programming (MILP) and a final NLP problem. The proposed formulation and approximation are applied to two low voltage networks of 18 nodes and 308 nodes, respectively.
url https://doi.org/10.1049/gtd2.12022
work_keys_str_mv AT iasoniavramidis agenericmultiperiodoptimalpowerflowframeworkforcombatingoperationalconstraintsviaresidentialflexibilityresources
AT florincapitanescu agenericmultiperiodoptimalpowerflowframeworkforcombatingoperationalconstraintsviaresidentialflexibilityresources
AT geertdeconinck agenericmultiperiodoptimalpowerflowframeworkforcombatingoperationalconstraintsviaresidentialflexibilityresources
AT iasoniavramidis genericmultiperiodoptimalpowerflowframeworkforcombatingoperationalconstraintsviaresidentialflexibilityresources
AT florincapitanescu genericmultiperiodoptimalpowerflowframeworkforcombatingoperationalconstraintsviaresidentialflexibilityresources
AT geertdeconinck genericmultiperiodoptimalpowerflowframeworkforcombatingoperationalconstraintsviaresidentialflexibilityresources
_version_ 1721302977457684480