In-Vitro Comparative Adhesion Evaluation of Bioceramic and Dual-Cure Resin Endodontic Sealers Using SEM, AFM, Push-Out and FTIR

(1) Background: Which are the adhesion characteristics of four root canal sealers: two experimental (dual cure resin based endodontic sealer (E1-DCR) and bioceramic based sealer (E2-BC)), and two commercial (RealSeal and TotallFill BC (FKG Germany)). (2) Methods. One-hundred-twenty extracted monorad...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Radu Marcel Chisnoiu, Marioara Moldovan, Doina Prodan, Andrea Maria Chisnoiu, Dana Hrab, Ada Gabriela Delean, Alexandrina Muntean, Doina Iulia Rotaru, Ovidiu Pastrav, Mihaela Pastrav
Format:	Article
Language:	English
Published:	MDPI AG 2021-05-01
Series:	Applied Sciences
Subjects:	bioceramic dual cure resin endodontic sealer adhesion
Online Access:	https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/10/4454

id	doaj-e5f7e1bff83940d295686788176699eb
record_format	Article
spelling	doaj-e5f7e1bff83940d295686788176699eb2021-05-31T23:59:20ZengMDPI AGApplied Sciences2076-34172021-05-01114454445410.3390/app11104454In-Vitro Comparative Adhesion Evaluation of Bioceramic and Dual-Cure Resin Endodontic Sealers Using SEM, AFM, Push-Out and FTIRRadu Marcel Chisnoiu0Marioara Moldovan1Doina Prodan2Andrea Maria Chisnoiu3Dana Hrab4Ada Gabriela Delean5Alexandrina Muntean6Doina Iulia Rotaru7Ovidiu Pastrav8Mihaela Pastrav9Department of Odontology, Endodontics and Oral Pathology, “Iuliu Hatieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 33 Motilor Street, 400001 Cluj-Napoca, RomaniaDepartment of Polymeric Composites, “Raluca Ripan” Institute of Research in Chemistry, “Babes Bolyai” University, 30 Fantanele Street, 400294 Cluj-Napoca, RomaniaDepartment of Polymeric Composites, “Raluca Ripan” Institute of Research in Chemistry, “Babes Bolyai” University, 30 Fantanele Street, 400294 Cluj-Napoca, RomaniaDepartment of Prosthodontics, “Iuliu Hatieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 32 Clinicilor Street, 400006 Cluj-Napoca, RomaniaDepartment of Odontology, Endodontics and Oral Pathology, “Iuliu Hatieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 33 Motilor Street, 400001 Cluj-Napoca, RomaniaDepartment of Odontology, Endodontics and Oral Pathology, “Iuliu Hatieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 33 Motilor Street, 400001 Cluj-Napoca, RomaniaDepartment of Pedodontics, “Iuliu Hatieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 31 Avram Iancu Street, 400083 Cluj-Napoca, RomaniaDepartment of Odontology, Endodontics and Oral Pathology, “Iuliu Hatieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 33 Motilor Street, 400001 Cluj-Napoca, RomaniaDepartment of Odontology, Endodontics and Oral Pathology, “Iuliu Hatieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 33 Motilor Street, 400001 Cluj-Napoca, RomaniaDepartment of Orthodontics, “Iuliu Hatieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 31 Avram Iancu Street, 400083 Cluj-Napoca, Romania(1) Background: Which are the adhesion characteristics of four root canal sealers: two experimental (dual cure resin based endodontic sealer (E1-DCR) and bioceramic based sealer (E2-BC)), and two commercial (RealSeal and TotallFill BC (FKG Germany)). (2) Methods. One-hundred-twenty extracted monoradicular teeth received mechanic-antiseptic preparation and then endodontic filling using gutta-percha in combination with one of the four sealers. Samples from the apical third were selected from each tooth and were randomly distributed for Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) and push-out bond strength. Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectroscopy was made exclusively for experimental sealers. (3) Results. The two experimental materials did not present a significant difference in apical sealing ability based on SEM evaluation. Gaps were identified in case of RealSeal samples and also lower penetration into the dentinal tubules compared to TotalFill BC. On AFM analysis a more pronounced penetration into the tubules was observed in case of E2-BC sealer was observed. E1-DCR registered a lower bond strength (0.7177 ± 0.55) in the apical third compared to Total Fill BC (<i>p</i> = 0.01). (4) Conclusions. Within the limitations of the current study, it can be stated that the two experimental sealers’ characteristics are comparable to that of the two consecrated materials.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/10/4454bioceramicdual cure resinendodontic sealeradhesion
collection	DOAJ
language	English
format	Article
sources	DOAJ
author	Radu Marcel Chisnoiu Marioara Moldovan Doina Prodan Andrea Maria Chisnoiu Dana Hrab Ada Gabriela Delean Alexandrina Muntean Doina Iulia Rotaru Ovidiu Pastrav Mihaela Pastrav
spellingShingle	Radu Marcel Chisnoiu Marioara Moldovan Doina Prodan Andrea Maria Chisnoiu Dana Hrab Ada Gabriela Delean Alexandrina Muntean Doina Iulia Rotaru Ovidiu Pastrav Mihaela Pastrav In-Vitro Comparative Adhesion Evaluation of Bioceramic and Dual-Cure Resin Endodontic Sealers Using SEM, AFM, Push-Out and FTIR Applied Sciences bioceramic dual cure resin endodontic sealer adhesion
author_facet	Radu Marcel Chisnoiu Marioara Moldovan Doina Prodan Andrea Maria Chisnoiu Dana Hrab Ada Gabriela Delean Alexandrina Muntean Doina Iulia Rotaru Ovidiu Pastrav Mihaela Pastrav
author_sort	Radu Marcel Chisnoiu
title	In-Vitro Comparative Adhesion Evaluation of Bioceramic and Dual-Cure Resin Endodontic Sealers Using SEM, AFM, Push-Out and FTIR
title_short	In-Vitro Comparative Adhesion Evaluation of Bioceramic and Dual-Cure Resin Endodontic Sealers Using SEM, AFM, Push-Out and FTIR
title_full	In-Vitro Comparative Adhesion Evaluation of Bioceramic and Dual-Cure Resin Endodontic Sealers Using SEM, AFM, Push-Out and FTIR
title_fullStr	In-Vitro Comparative Adhesion Evaluation of Bioceramic and Dual-Cure Resin Endodontic Sealers Using SEM, AFM, Push-Out and FTIR
title_full_unstemmed	In-Vitro Comparative Adhesion Evaluation of Bioceramic and Dual-Cure Resin Endodontic Sealers Using SEM, AFM, Push-Out and FTIR
title_sort	in-vitro comparative adhesion evaluation of bioceramic and dual-cure resin endodontic sealers using sem, afm, push-out and ftir
publisher	MDPI AG
series	Applied Sciences
issn	2076-3417
publishDate	2021-05-01
description	(1) Background: Which are the adhesion characteristics of four root canal sealers: two experimental (dual cure resin based endodontic sealer (E1-DCR) and bioceramic based sealer (E2-BC)), and two commercial (RealSeal and TotallFill BC (FKG Germany)). (2) Methods. One-hundred-twenty extracted monoradicular teeth received mechanic-antiseptic preparation and then endodontic filling using gutta-percha in combination with one of the four sealers. Samples from the apical third were selected from each tooth and were randomly distributed for Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) and push-out bond strength. Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectroscopy was made exclusively for experimental sealers. (3) Results. The two experimental materials did not present a significant difference in apical sealing ability based on SEM evaluation. Gaps were identified in case of RealSeal samples and also lower penetration into the dentinal tubules compared to TotalFill BC. On AFM analysis a more pronounced penetration into the tubules was observed in case of E2-BC sealer was observed. E1-DCR registered a lower bond strength (0.7177 ± 0.55) in the apical third compared to Total Fill BC (<i>p</i> = 0.01). (4) Conclusions. Within the limitations of the current study, it can be stated that the two experimental sealers’ characteristics are comparable to that of the two consecrated materials.
topic	bioceramic dual cure resin endodontic sealer adhesion
url	https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/10/4454
work_keys_str_mv	AT radumarcelchisnoiu invitrocomparativeadhesionevaluationofbioceramicanddualcureresinendodonticsealersusingsemafmpushoutandftir AT marioaramoldovan invitrocomparativeadhesionevaluationofbioceramicanddualcureresinendodonticsealersusingsemafmpushoutandftir AT doinaprodan invitrocomparativeadhesionevaluationofbioceramicanddualcureresinendodonticsealersusingsemafmpushoutandftir AT andreamariachisnoiu invitrocomparativeadhesionevaluationofbioceramicanddualcureresinendodonticsealersusingsemafmpushoutandftir AT danahrab invitrocomparativeadhesionevaluationofbioceramicanddualcureresinendodonticsealersusingsemafmpushoutandftir AT adagabrieladelean invitrocomparativeadhesionevaluationofbioceramicanddualcureresinendodonticsealersusingsemafmpushoutandftir AT alexandrinamuntean invitrocomparativeadhesionevaluationofbioceramicanddualcureresinendodonticsealersusingsemafmpushoutandftir AT doinaiuliarotaru invitrocomparativeadhesionevaluationofbioceramicanddualcureresinendodonticsealersusingsemafmpushoutandftir AT ovidiupastrav invitrocomparativeadhesionevaluationofbioceramicanddualcureresinendodonticsealersusingsemafmpushoutandftir AT mihaelapastrav invitrocomparativeadhesionevaluationofbioceramicanddualcureresinendodonticsealersusingsemafmpushoutandftir
_version_	1721416054381477888

In-Vitro Comparative Adhesion Evaluation of Bioceramic and Dual-Cure Resin Endodontic Sealers Using SEM, AFM, Push-Out and FTIR

Similar Items