Parametric versus non-parametric statistics in the analysis of randomized trials with non-normally distributed data

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>It has generally been argued that parametric statistics should not be applied to data with non-normal distributions. Empirical research has demonstrated that Mann-Whitney generally has greater power than the <it>t</it>-te...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Vickers Andrew J
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2005-11-01
Series:BMC Medical Research Methodology
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2288/5/35
id doaj-e5c4d60972c548bdb2af4c1eb8081c17
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e5c4d60972c548bdb2af4c1eb8081c172020-11-24T21:56:32ZengBMCBMC Medical Research Methodology1471-22882005-11-01513510.1186/1471-2288-5-35Parametric versus non-parametric statistics in the analysis of randomized trials with non-normally distributed dataVickers Andrew J<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>It has generally been argued that parametric statistics should not be applied to data with non-normal distributions. Empirical research has demonstrated that Mann-Whitney generally has greater power than the <it>t</it>-test unless data are sampled from the normal. In the case of randomized trials, we are typically interested in how an endpoint, such as blood pressure or pain, changes following treatment. Such trials should be analyzed using ANCOVA, rather than <it>t</it>-test. The objectives of this study were: a) to compare the relative power of Mann-Whitney and ANCOVA; b) to determine whether ANCOVA provides an unbiased estimate for the difference between groups; c) to investigate the distribution of change scores between repeat assessments of a non-normally distributed variable.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Polynomials were developed to simulate five archetypal non-normal distributions for baseline and post-treatment scores in a randomized trial. Simulation studies compared the power of Mann-Whitney and ANCOVA for analyzing each distribution, varying sample size, correlation and type of treatment effect (ratio or shift).</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Change between skewed baseline and post-treatment data tended towards a normal distribution. ANCOVA was generally superior to Mann-Whitney in most situations, especially where log-transformed data were entered into the model. The estimate of the treatment effect from ANCOVA was not importantly biased.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>ANCOVA is the preferred method of analyzing randomized trials with baseline and post-treatment measures. In certain extreme cases, ANCOVA is less powerful than Mann-Whitney. Notably, in these cases, the estimate of treatment effect provided by ANCOVA is of questionable interpretability.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2288/5/35
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Vickers Andrew J
spellingShingle Vickers Andrew J
Parametric versus non-parametric statistics in the analysis of randomized trials with non-normally distributed data
BMC Medical Research Methodology
author_facet Vickers Andrew J
author_sort Vickers Andrew J
title Parametric versus non-parametric statistics in the analysis of randomized trials with non-normally distributed data
title_short Parametric versus non-parametric statistics in the analysis of randomized trials with non-normally distributed data
title_full Parametric versus non-parametric statistics in the analysis of randomized trials with non-normally distributed data
title_fullStr Parametric versus non-parametric statistics in the analysis of randomized trials with non-normally distributed data
title_full_unstemmed Parametric versus non-parametric statistics in the analysis of randomized trials with non-normally distributed data
title_sort parametric versus non-parametric statistics in the analysis of randomized trials with non-normally distributed data
publisher BMC
series BMC Medical Research Methodology
issn 1471-2288
publishDate 2005-11-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>It has generally been argued that parametric statistics should not be applied to data with non-normal distributions. Empirical research has demonstrated that Mann-Whitney generally has greater power than the <it>t</it>-test unless data are sampled from the normal. In the case of randomized trials, we are typically interested in how an endpoint, such as blood pressure or pain, changes following treatment. Such trials should be analyzed using ANCOVA, rather than <it>t</it>-test. The objectives of this study were: a) to compare the relative power of Mann-Whitney and ANCOVA; b) to determine whether ANCOVA provides an unbiased estimate for the difference between groups; c) to investigate the distribution of change scores between repeat assessments of a non-normally distributed variable.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Polynomials were developed to simulate five archetypal non-normal distributions for baseline and post-treatment scores in a randomized trial. Simulation studies compared the power of Mann-Whitney and ANCOVA for analyzing each distribution, varying sample size, correlation and type of treatment effect (ratio or shift).</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Change between skewed baseline and post-treatment data tended towards a normal distribution. ANCOVA was generally superior to Mann-Whitney in most situations, especially where log-transformed data were entered into the model. The estimate of the treatment effect from ANCOVA was not importantly biased.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>ANCOVA is the preferred method of analyzing randomized trials with baseline and post-treatment measures. In certain extreme cases, ANCOVA is less powerful than Mann-Whitney. Notably, in these cases, the estimate of treatment effect provided by ANCOVA is of questionable interpretability.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2288/5/35
work_keys_str_mv AT vickersandrewj parametricversusnonparametricstatisticsintheanalysisofrandomizedtrialswithnonnormallydistributeddata
_version_ 1725858574240841728