Effects of study area size on geographic characterizations of health events: Prostate cancer incidence in Southern New England, USA, 1994–1998

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>We consider how representations of geographic variation in prostate cancer incidence across Southern New England, USA may be affected by selection of study area and/or properties of the statistical analysis.</p> <p>Method...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: DeChello Laurie, Samociuk Holly, Gregorio David I, Swede Helen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2006-02-01
Series:International Journal of Health Geographics
Online Access:http://www.ij-healthgeographics.com/content/5/1/8
id doaj-e5ba53e9590e43a8b4b8f28263e5848d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e5ba53e9590e43a8b4b8f28263e5848d2020-11-25T00:24:55ZengBMCInternational Journal of Health Geographics1476-072X2006-02-0151810.1186/1476-072X-5-8Effects of study area size on geographic characterizations of health events: Prostate cancer incidence in Southern New England, USA, 1994–1998DeChello LaurieSamociuk HollyGregorio David ISwede Helen<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>We consider how representations of geographic variation in prostate cancer incidence across Southern New England, USA may be affected by selection of study area and/or properties of the statistical analysis.</p> <p>Method</p> <p>A spatial scan statistic was used to monitor geographic variation among 35,167 incident prostate cancer cases diagnosed in Massachusetts, Connecticut and Rhode Island from 1994 to 1998, in relation to the 1990 populations of men 20+ years of age living in that region. Results from the combined-states analysis were compared to those from single-states. Impact of scanning procedures set to examine up to 50% or no more than10% of at-risk populations also was evaluated.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>With scanning set to 50%, 5 locations in the combined-states analysis were identified with markedly distinct incidence rates. Fewer than expected cases were estimated for nearly all Connecticut, Rhode Island and West Central Massachusetts, whereas census tracts on and around Cape Cod, and areas of Southwestern Connecticut and adjacent to greater Boston were estimated to have yielded more than expected incidence. Results of single-state analyses exhibited several discrepancies from the combined-states analysis. More conservative scanning found many more locations with varying incidence, but discrepancies between the combined- and single-state analysis were fewer.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>It is important to acknowledge the conditional nature of spatial analyses and carefully consider whether a true cluster of events is identified or artifact stemming from selection of study area size and/or scanning properties.</p> http://www.ij-healthgeographics.com/content/5/1/8
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author DeChello Laurie
Samociuk Holly
Gregorio David I
Swede Helen
spellingShingle DeChello Laurie
Samociuk Holly
Gregorio David I
Swede Helen
Effects of study area size on geographic characterizations of health events: Prostate cancer incidence in Southern New England, USA, 1994–1998
International Journal of Health Geographics
author_facet DeChello Laurie
Samociuk Holly
Gregorio David I
Swede Helen
author_sort DeChello Laurie
title Effects of study area size on geographic characterizations of health events: Prostate cancer incidence in Southern New England, USA, 1994–1998
title_short Effects of study area size on geographic characterizations of health events: Prostate cancer incidence in Southern New England, USA, 1994–1998
title_full Effects of study area size on geographic characterizations of health events: Prostate cancer incidence in Southern New England, USA, 1994–1998
title_fullStr Effects of study area size on geographic characterizations of health events: Prostate cancer incidence in Southern New England, USA, 1994–1998
title_full_unstemmed Effects of study area size on geographic characterizations of health events: Prostate cancer incidence in Southern New England, USA, 1994–1998
title_sort effects of study area size on geographic characterizations of health events: prostate cancer incidence in southern new england, usa, 1994–1998
publisher BMC
series International Journal of Health Geographics
issn 1476-072X
publishDate 2006-02-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>We consider how representations of geographic variation in prostate cancer incidence across Southern New England, USA may be affected by selection of study area and/or properties of the statistical analysis.</p> <p>Method</p> <p>A spatial scan statistic was used to monitor geographic variation among 35,167 incident prostate cancer cases diagnosed in Massachusetts, Connecticut and Rhode Island from 1994 to 1998, in relation to the 1990 populations of men 20+ years of age living in that region. Results from the combined-states analysis were compared to those from single-states. Impact of scanning procedures set to examine up to 50% or no more than10% of at-risk populations also was evaluated.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>With scanning set to 50%, 5 locations in the combined-states analysis were identified with markedly distinct incidence rates. Fewer than expected cases were estimated for nearly all Connecticut, Rhode Island and West Central Massachusetts, whereas census tracts on and around Cape Cod, and areas of Southwestern Connecticut and adjacent to greater Boston were estimated to have yielded more than expected incidence. Results of single-state analyses exhibited several discrepancies from the combined-states analysis. More conservative scanning found many more locations with varying incidence, but discrepancies between the combined- and single-state analysis were fewer.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>It is important to acknowledge the conditional nature of spatial analyses and carefully consider whether a true cluster of events is identified or artifact stemming from selection of study area size and/or scanning properties.</p>
url http://www.ij-healthgeographics.com/content/5/1/8
work_keys_str_mv AT dechellolaurie effectsofstudyareasizeongeographiccharacterizationsofhealtheventsprostatecancerincidenceinsouthernnewenglandusa19941998
AT samociukholly effectsofstudyareasizeongeographiccharacterizationsofhealtheventsprostatecancerincidenceinsouthernnewenglandusa19941998
AT gregoriodavidi effectsofstudyareasizeongeographiccharacterizationsofhealtheventsprostatecancerincidenceinsouthernnewenglandusa19941998
AT swedehelen effectsofstudyareasizeongeographiccharacterizationsofhealtheventsprostatecancerincidenceinsouthernnewenglandusa19941998
_version_ 1725350912396886016