The Archaeological Impacts of Metal Detecting

In a comment on two recent articles on the archaeological impacts of metal detecting, this paper advocates clearer and more valid measures of those impacts and more nuanced classification of the legal and cultural environments in which metal detecting takes place. The need to rely on open-source, on...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Banning Edward B.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: De Gruyter 2019-05-01
Series:Open Archaeology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1515/opar-2019-0013
id doaj-e5b40b0ffb4c46d987eb69bf3ab3dcad
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e5b40b0ffb4c46d987eb69bf3ab3dcad2021-10-02T19:19:25ZengDe GruyterOpen Archaeology2300-65602019-05-015118018610.1515/opar-2019-0013opar-2019-0013The Archaeological Impacts of Metal DetectingBanning Edward B.0University of Toronto, 19 Russell St., Toronto, Ontario, CanadaIn a comment on two recent articles on the archaeological impacts of metal detecting, this paper advocates clearer and more valid measures of those impacts and more nuanced classification of the legal and cultural environments in which metal detecting takes place. The need to rely on open-source, online data for transnational analysis makes the former challenging but not impossible. Using the example of Canada, the paper shows that jurisdictional and other complexities make simple “permissive” and “restrictive/prohibitive” dichotomies unhelpful, and suggests using multivariate analysis that accounts for such factors as presumption of ownership, locations of metal detecting, availability of finds reporting, and whether heritage legislation concerns artifacts or only sites. This is essential for development of sound, evidence-based policy on the metal-detecting hobby.https://doi.org/10.1515/opar-2019-0013metal detectorsheritage policycanadian heritage
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Banning Edward B.
spellingShingle Banning Edward B.
The Archaeological Impacts of Metal Detecting
Open Archaeology
metal detectors
heritage policy
canadian heritage
author_facet Banning Edward B.
author_sort Banning Edward B.
title The Archaeological Impacts of Metal Detecting
title_short The Archaeological Impacts of Metal Detecting
title_full The Archaeological Impacts of Metal Detecting
title_fullStr The Archaeological Impacts of Metal Detecting
title_full_unstemmed The Archaeological Impacts of Metal Detecting
title_sort archaeological impacts of metal detecting
publisher De Gruyter
series Open Archaeology
issn 2300-6560
publishDate 2019-05-01
description In a comment on two recent articles on the archaeological impacts of metal detecting, this paper advocates clearer and more valid measures of those impacts and more nuanced classification of the legal and cultural environments in which metal detecting takes place. The need to rely on open-source, online data for transnational analysis makes the former challenging but not impossible. Using the example of Canada, the paper shows that jurisdictional and other complexities make simple “permissive” and “restrictive/prohibitive” dichotomies unhelpful, and suggests using multivariate analysis that accounts for such factors as presumption of ownership, locations of metal detecting, availability of finds reporting, and whether heritage legislation concerns artifacts or only sites. This is essential for development of sound, evidence-based policy on the metal-detecting hobby.
topic metal detectors
heritage policy
canadian heritage
url https://doi.org/10.1515/opar-2019-0013
work_keys_str_mv AT banningedwardb thearchaeologicalimpactsofmetaldetecting
AT banningedwardb archaeologicalimpactsofmetaldetecting
_version_ 1716847168452558848