The Archaeological Impacts of Metal Detecting
In a comment on two recent articles on the archaeological impacts of metal detecting, this paper advocates clearer and more valid measures of those impacts and more nuanced classification of the legal and cultural environments in which metal detecting takes place. The need to rely on open-source, on...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
De Gruyter
2019-05-01
|
Series: | Open Archaeology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1515/opar-2019-0013 |
id |
doaj-e5b40b0ffb4c46d987eb69bf3ab3dcad |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-e5b40b0ffb4c46d987eb69bf3ab3dcad2021-10-02T19:19:25ZengDe GruyterOpen Archaeology2300-65602019-05-015118018610.1515/opar-2019-0013opar-2019-0013The Archaeological Impacts of Metal DetectingBanning Edward B.0University of Toronto, 19 Russell St., Toronto, Ontario, CanadaIn a comment on two recent articles on the archaeological impacts of metal detecting, this paper advocates clearer and more valid measures of those impacts and more nuanced classification of the legal and cultural environments in which metal detecting takes place. The need to rely on open-source, online data for transnational analysis makes the former challenging but not impossible. Using the example of Canada, the paper shows that jurisdictional and other complexities make simple “permissive” and “restrictive/prohibitive” dichotomies unhelpful, and suggests using multivariate analysis that accounts for such factors as presumption of ownership, locations of metal detecting, availability of finds reporting, and whether heritage legislation concerns artifacts or only sites. This is essential for development of sound, evidence-based policy on the metal-detecting hobby.https://doi.org/10.1515/opar-2019-0013metal detectorsheritage policycanadian heritage |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Banning Edward B. |
spellingShingle |
Banning Edward B. The Archaeological Impacts of Metal Detecting Open Archaeology metal detectors heritage policy canadian heritage |
author_facet |
Banning Edward B. |
author_sort |
Banning Edward B. |
title |
The Archaeological Impacts of Metal Detecting |
title_short |
The Archaeological Impacts of Metal Detecting |
title_full |
The Archaeological Impacts of Metal Detecting |
title_fullStr |
The Archaeological Impacts of Metal Detecting |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Archaeological Impacts of Metal Detecting |
title_sort |
archaeological impacts of metal detecting |
publisher |
De Gruyter |
series |
Open Archaeology |
issn |
2300-6560 |
publishDate |
2019-05-01 |
description |
In a comment on two recent articles on the archaeological impacts of metal detecting, this paper advocates clearer and more valid measures of those impacts and more nuanced classification of the legal and cultural environments in which metal detecting takes place. The need to rely on open-source, online data for transnational analysis makes the former challenging but not impossible. Using the example of Canada, the paper shows that jurisdictional and other complexities make simple “permissive” and “restrictive/prohibitive” dichotomies unhelpful, and suggests using multivariate analysis that accounts for such factors as presumption of ownership, locations of metal detecting, availability of finds reporting, and whether heritage legislation concerns artifacts or only sites. This is essential for development of sound, evidence-based policy on the metal-detecting hobby. |
topic |
metal detectors heritage policy canadian heritage |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1515/opar-2019-0013 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT banningedwardb thearchaeologicalimpactsofmetaldetecting AT banningedwardb archaeologicalimpactsofmetaldetecting |
_version_ |
1716847168452558848 |