First stewards: ecological outcomes of forest and wildlife stewardship by indigenous peoples of Wisconsin, USA

Indigenous peoples manage forestlands and wildlife differently than public and private forestland managers. To evaluate ecological outcomes from these differences, we compared the structure, composition, and diversity of Ojibwe and Menominee tribal forests to nearby nontribal forestlands in northern...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Donald M. Waller, Nicholas J. Reo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Resilience Alliance 2018-03-01
Series:Ecology and Society
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol23/iss1/art45/
id doaj-e5b3b7c38c684caaa9ee98afe9c5b613
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e5b3b7c38c684caaa9ee98afe9c5b6132020-11-24T21:17:55ZengResilience AllianceEcology and Society1708-30872018-03-012314510.5751/ES-09865-2301459865First stewards: ecological outcomes of forest and wildlife stewardship by indigenous peoples of Wisconsin, USADonald M. Waller0Nicholas J. Reo1University of Wisconsin - MadisonDartmouth CollegeIndigenous peoples manage forestlands and wildlife differently than public and private forestland managers. To evaluate ecological outcomes from these differences, we compared the structure, composition, and diversity of Ojibwe and Menominee tribal forests to nearby nontribal forestlands in northern Wisconsin. These indigenous peoples seek to manage forests for mature conditions, accommodate wolves and other predators, and hunt deer to sustain traditional livelihood values. Their forests are often more mature with higher tree volume, higher rates of tree regeneration, more plant diversity, and fewer invasive species than nearby nontribal forestlands. In contrast, nontribal forestlands lost appreciable plant diversity in the 20th century and have failed to regenerate tree species sensitive to deer herbivory. Ensuing shifts in forest composition and wildlife populations have jeopardized the ability of managers to sustain wildlife and meet certification standards on nontribal forestlands. Lessons from tribal forestlands could help improve the sustainable management of nontribal public forestlands.http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol23/iss1/art45/carbon storagedeer browse impactsforest managementindigenous land tenureindigenous valuestree regeneration
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Donald M. Waller
Nicholas J. Reo
spellingShingle Donald M. Waller
Nicholas J. Reo
First stewards: ecological outcomes of forest and wildlife stewardship by indigenous peoples of Wisconsin, USA
Ecology and Society
carbon storage
deer browse impacts
forest management
indigenous land tenure
indigenous values
tree regeneration
author_facet Donald M. Waller
Nicholas J. Reo
author_sort Donald M. Waller
title First stewards: ecological outcomes of forest and wildlife stewardship by indigenous peoples of Wisconsin, USA
title_short First stewards: ecological outcomes of forest and wildlife stewardship by indigenous peoples of Wisconsin, USA
title_full First stewards: ecological outcomes of forest and wildlife stewardship by indigenous peoples of Wisconsin, USA
title_fullStr First stewards: ecological outcomes of forest and wildlife stewardship by indigenous peoples of Wisconsin, USA
title_full_unstemmed First stewards: ecological outcomes of forest and wildlife stewardship by indigenous peoples of Wisconsin, USA
title_sort first stewards: ecological outcomes of forest and wildlife stewardship by indigenous peoples of wisconsin, usa
publisher Resilience Alliance
series Ecology and Society
issn 1708-3087
publishDate 2018-03-01
description Indigenous peoples manage forestlands and wildlife differently than public and private forestland managers. To evaluate ecological outcomes from these differences, we compared the structure, composition, and diversity of Ojibwe and Menominee tribal forests to nearby nontribal forestlands in northern Wisconsin. These indigenous peoples seek to manage forests for mature conditions, accommodate wolves and other predators, and hunt deer to sustain traditional livelihood values. Their forests are often more mature with higher tree volume, higher rates of tree regeneration, more plant diversity, and fewer invasive species than nearby nontribal forestlands. In contrast, nontribal forestlands lost appreciable plant diversity in the 20th century and have failed to regenerate tree species sensitive to deer herbivory. Ensuing shifts in forest composition and wildlife populations have jeopardized the ability of managers to sustain wildlife and meet certification standards on nontribal forestlands. Lessons from tribal forestlands could help improve the sustainable management of nontribal public forestlands.
topic carbon storage
deer browse impacts
forest management
indigenous land tenure
indigenous values
tree regeneration
url http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol23/iss1/art45/
work_keys_str_mv AT donaldmwaller firststewardsecologicaloutcomesofforestandwildlifestewardshipbyindigenouspeoplesofwisconsinusa
AT nicholasjreo firststewardsecologicaloutcomesofforestandwildlifestewardshipbyindigenouspeoplesofwisconsinusa
_version_ 1716739522613477376