The myth of washoku: a twisted discourse on the “uniqueness” of national food heritages
In 2013, Japan and Korea celebrated their first food culture registrations with the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization on the Representative List of the Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity. This paper first reviews the overall situation regarding washoku. Then, th...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2017-06-01
|
Series: | Journal of Ethnic Foods |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352618117300331 |
id |
doaj-e5884fae93b64d9eb0db338f52b49acc |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-e5884fae93b64d9eb0db338f52b49acc2020-11-25T00:58:12ZengBMCJournal of Ethnic Foods2352-61812017-06-0142667110.1016/j.jef.2017.05.004The myth of washoku: a twisted discourse on the “uniqueness” of national food heritagesRyo KohsakaIn 2013, Japan and Korea celebrated their first food culture registrations with the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization on the Representative List of the Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity. This paper first reviews the overall situation regarding washoku. Then, the washoku concept is analyzed and we argue that the idea is ambiguous. The washoku concept is contested and not necessarily clearly defined, but certain characteristics exist. The “uniqueness” is emphasized in the UNESCO registration while the reasoning or storyline for applications, such as relationships to nature, traditional preparations, community cohesion are “common” with other applications. The context of registration is frequently misinterpreted, and washoku has certain elements that are responsive to changes, despite its authentic and unchanged popular image. The ambiguity has both positive and negative aspects. It functions as a framework to enable groups with different interests or interpretations to participate in the process.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352618117300331discourseintangible cultural heritage of humanityregistrationUNESCOwashoku |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Ryo Kohsaka |
spellingShingle |
Ryo Kohsaka The myth of washoku: a twisted discourse on the “uniqueness” of national food heritages Journal of Ethnic Foods discourse intangible cultural heritage of humanity registration UNESCO washoku |
author_facet |
Ryo Kohsaka |
author_sort |
Ryo Kohsaka |
title |
The myth of washoku: a twisted discourse on the “uniqueness” of national food heritages |
title_short |
The myth of washoku: a twisted discourse on the “uniqueness” of national food heritages |
title_full |
The myth of washoku: a twisted discourse on the “uniqueness” of national food heritages |
title_fullStr |
The myth of washoku: a twisted discourse on the “uniqueness” of national food heritages |
title_full_unstemmed |
The myth of washoku: a twisted discourse on the “uniqueness” of national food heritages |
title_sort |
myth of washoku: a twisted discourse on the “uniqueness” of national food heritages |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
Journal of Ethnic Foods |
issn |
2352-6181 |
publishDate |
2017-06-01 |
description |
In 2013, Japan and Korea celebrated their first food culture registrations with the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization on the Representative List of the Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity. This paper first reviews the overall situation regarding washoku. Then, the washoku concept is analyzed and we argue that the idea is ambiguous. The washoku concept is contested and not necessarily clearly defined, but certain characteristics exist. The “uniqueness” is emphasized in the UNESCO registration while the reasoning or storyline for applications, such as relationships to nature, traditional preparations, community cohesion are “common” with other applications. The context of registration is frequently misinterpreted, and washoku has certain elements that are responsive to changes, despite its authentic and unchanged popular image. The ambiguity has both positive and negative aspects. It functions as a framework to enable groups with different interests or interpretations to participate in the process. |
topic |
discourse intangible cultural heritage of humanity registration UNESCO washoku |
url |
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352618117300331 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT ryokohsaka themythofwashokuatwisteddiscourseontheuniquenessofnationalfoodheritages AT ryokohsaka mythofwashokuatwisteddiscourseontheuniquenessofnationalfoodheritages |
_version_ |
1725221133694795776 |