A Curriculum Evaluation the Doctor of Philosophy (Education) Degree in Social Studies (Improved B.E.2557) The Faculty of Education, Chiang Mai University

This research was conducted with the aims of evaluating the curriculum consist of seeking a framework for developing and improving the Doctor of Philosophy (Education) Degree in Social Studies (Improved B.E.2557), the Faculty of Education, Chiang Mai University through a evaluation research use o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Chetthapoom Wannapaisan
Format: Article
Language:Thai
Published: Mahasarakham University 2019-06-01
Series:Journal of Education, Mahasarakham University
Subjects:
Online Access:https://edu.msu.ac.th/journal/home/journal_file/591.pdf
id doaj-e562e48bee2c4615a4902603fcd324ce
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e562e48bee2c4615a4902603fcd324ce2020-11-25T00:47:49ZthaMahasarakham UniversityJournal of Education, Mahasarakham University1905-99221905-99222019-06-01132122135A Curriculum Evaluation the Doctor of Philosophy (Education) Degree in Social Studies (Improved B.E.2557) The Faculty of Education, Chiang Mai UniversityChetthapoom Wannapaisan0Faculty of Education, Chiang Mai UniversityThis research was conducted with the aims of evaluating the curriculum consist of seeking a framework for developing and improving the Doctor of Philosophy (Education) Degree in Social Studies (Improved B.E.2557), the Faculty of Education, Chiang Mai University through a evaluation research use of CIPPi evaluation model. The sample groups comprised such as doctor’s graduates, current students, teachers, superiors or employers of doctor’s graduates, and qualified experts. The research instruments were a set of questionnaires and structured interviews ; and the data obtained were analyzed using frequency, percentage, means, standard deviation and content analysis. The findings can be concluded that: context evaluation: C, input evaluation: I, process evaluation: P, product evaluation: P and impact evaluation: I, every aspect as a whole, at a high level. For developing and improving a curriculum to focused as promote and support the development of diverse student potential ; modern and flexible situation. Moreover, establishment of academic networks between academic institutions both in Thailand and abroad. Focus on giving graduates knowledge, experience and research process obtained from the curriculum applying to work in their profession and organization continuously. And quality according to international standards.https://edu.msu.ac.th/journal/home/journal_file/591.pdfCurriculum evaluationDoctor of Philosophy (Education) degreesocial studies
collection DOAJ
language Thai
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Chetthapoom Wannapaisan
spellingShingle Chetthapoom Wannapaisan
A Curriculum Evaluation the Doctor of Philosophy (Education) Degree in Social Studies (Improved B.E.2557) The Faculty of Education, Chiang Mai University
Journal of Education, Mahasarakham University
Curriculum evaluation
Doctor of Philosophy (Education) degree
social studies
author_facet Chetthapoom Wannapaisan
author_sort Chetthapoom Wannapaisan
title A Curriculum Evaluation the Doctor of Philosophy (Education) Degree in Social Studies (Improved B.E.2557) The Faculty of Education, Chiang Mai University
title_short A Curriculum Evaluation the Doctor of Philosophy (Education) Degree in Social Studies (Improved B.E.2557) The Faculty of Education, Chiang Mai University
title_full A Curriculum Evaluation the Doctor of Philosophy (Education) Degree in Social Studies (Improved B.E.2557) The Faculty of Education, Chiang Mai University
title_fullStr A Curriculum Evaluation the Doctor of Philosophy (Education) Degree in Social Studies (Improved B.E.2557) The Faculty of Education, Chiang Mai University
title_full_unstemmed A Curriculum Evaluation the Doctor of Philosophy (Education) Degree in Social Studies (Improved B.E.2557) The Faculty of Education, Chiang Mai University
title_sort curriculum evaluation the doctor of philosophy (education) degree in social studies (improved b.e.2557) the faculty of education, chiang mai university
publisher Mahasarakham University
series Journal of Education, Mahasarakham University
issn 1905-9922
1905-9922
publishDate 2019-06-01
description This research was conducted with the aims of evaluating the curriculum consist of seeking a framework for developing and improving the Doctor of Philosophy (Education) Degree in Social Studies (Improved B.E.2557), the Faculty of Education, Chiang Mai University through a evaluation research use of CIPPi evaluation model. The sample groups comprised such as doctor’s graduates, current students, teachers, superiors or employers of doctor’s graduates, and qualified experts. The research instruments were a set of questionnaires and structured interviews ; and the data obtained were analyzed using frequency, percentage, means, standard deviation and content analysis. The findings can be concluded that: context evaluation: C, input evaluation: I, process evaluation: P, product evaluation: P and impact evaluation: I, every aspect as a whole, at a high level. For developing and improving a curriculum to focused as promote and support the development of diverse student potential ; modern and flexible situation. Moreover, establishment of academic networks between academic institutions both in Thailand and abroad. Focus on giving graduates knowledge, experience and research process obtained from the curriculum applying to work in their profession and organization continuously. And quality according to international standards.
topic Curriculum evaluation
Doctor of Philosophy (Education) degree
social studies
url https://edu.msu.ac.th/journal/home/journal_file/591.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT chetthapoomwannapaisan acurriculumevaluationthedoctorofphilosophyeducationdegreeinsocialstudiesimprovedbe2557thefacultyofeducationchiangmaiuniversity
AT chetthapoomwannapaisan curriculumevaluationthedoctorofphilosophyeducationdegreeinsocialstudiesimprovedbe2557thefacultyofeducationchiangmaiuniversity
_version_ 1725258337364213760