Organ-Sparing Surgery in Testicular Tumor: Is This the Right Approach for Lesions ≤ 20 mm?

<strong>Background: </strong>This study was conducted in order to analyze factors predicting malignancy in patients undergoing organ-sparing surgery (OSS) for small testicular lesions. <strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with small (£20 mm) marker-negative clinical stage I tes...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nina Staudacher, Gennadi Tulchiner, Katie Bates, Michael Ladurner, Mona Kafka, Friedrich Aigner, Renate Pichler, Wolfgang Horninger
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-09-01
Series:Journal of Clinical Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/9/9/2911
Description
Summary:<strong>Background: </strong>This study was conducted in order to analyze factors predicting malignancy in patients undergoing organ-sparing surgery (OSS) for small testicular lesions. <strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with small (£20 mm) marker-negative clinical stage I testicular tumors were managed by OSS with tumor enucleation and frozen section examination (FSE) for the past 15 years at our institution. Benign and malignant cases were compared, focusing on preoperative and postoperative lesion sizes. <strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-nine patients were enrolled in this retrospective study. Ten (11.2%) of them were treated for synchronous bilateral tumors. Sixty-seven (67.7%) of ninety-nine lesions were benign, confirming a high concordance rate (98%) between FSE and final histology. Patients with benign tumors were significantly older than patients with malignant tumors (<em>p </em>= 0.026), and benign tumors were detected more frequently during urologic work-up of hormone disorders (<em>p </em>= 0.001). Preoperative tumor size was a strong predictor of malignancy (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.726; <em>p </em>< 0.001). According to the Youden index, the best cutoff to predict tumor dignity was 13.5 mm, resulting in a sensitivity and specificity of 53% and 85%, respectively. No cases of local recurrence or distant metastasis were confirmed after a median follow-up of 42 months. <strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings are consistent with previous reports, supporting an OSS approach in small testicular tumors whenever possible. Most tumors ≤ 20 mm were benign, and in the case of malignancy, OSS with FSE and consecutive orchiectomy is oncologically safe due to the high concordance rate of FSE and final histology, thus preventing a two-stage procedure.
ISSN:2077-0383