Empathy, Social Dominance Orientation, Mortality Salience, and Perceptions of a Criminal Defendant

In two studies, participants completed measures of trait empathy and social dominance orientation, read a summary of a hit and run trial, and provided reactions to the case. In Study 1, the three randomly assigned conditions included a prompt to empathize with the victims, the empathy prompt with a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Donna Crawley, Richard Suarez
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2016-02-01
Series:SAGE Open
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016629185
id doaj-e55f0e8ef65144e1aead541c2d9f28b9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e55f0e8ef65144e1aead541c2d9f28b92020-11-25T03:22:47ZengSAGE PublishingSAGE Open2158-24402016-02-01610.1177/215824401662918510.1177_2158244016629185Empathy, Social Dominance Orientation, Mortality Salience, and Perceptions of a Criminal DefendantDonna Crawley0Richard Suarez1Ramapo College of New Jersey, Mahwah, USARamapo College of New Jersey, Mahwah, USAIn two studies, participants completed measures of trait empathy and social dominance orientation, read a summary of a hit and run trial, and provided reactions to the case. In Study 1, the three randomly assigned conditions included a prompt to empathize with the victims, the empathy prompt with a mortality salience manipulation, and a control condition. Participants high in trait empathy were harsher in their judgments of the defendant than were low empathy participants, particularly after having read the mortality salience prompt. The results indicated that mortality salience had triggered personality differences. Participants high in social dominance assigned harsher sentences across conditions. Study 2 involved the same paradigm, but the prompts were presented on behalf of the defendant. Despite the pro-defendant slant, the pattern of results was similar to Study 1. Differences by trait empathy were more apparent among participants experiencing mortality salience, and social dominance was related to sentence choices. There were no indications in either study of mortality salience increasing bias against defendants in general or increasing racial bias.https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016629185
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Donna Crawley
Richard Suarez
spellingShingle Donna Crawley
Richard Suarez
Empathy, Social Dominance Orientation, Mortality Salience, and Perceptions of a Criminal Defendant
SAGE Open
author_facet Donna Crawley
Richard Suarez
author_sort Donna Crawley
title Empathy, Social Dominance Orientation, Mortality Salience, and Perceptions of a Criminal Defendant
title_short Empathy, Social Dominance Orientation, Mortality Salience, and Perceptions of a Criminal Defendant
title_full Empathy, Social Dominance Orientation, Mortality Salience, and Perceptions of a Criminal Defendant
title_fullStr Empathy, Social Dominance Orientation, Mortality Salience, and Perceptions of a Criminal Defendant
title_full_unstemmed Empathy, Social Dominance Orientation, Mortality Salience, and Perceptions of a Criminal Defendant
title_sort empathy, social dominance orientation, mortality salience, and perceptions of a criminal defendant
publisher SAGE Publishing
series SAGE Open
issn 2158-2440
publishDate 2016-02-01
description In two studies, participants completed measures of trait empathy and social dominance orientation, read a summary of a hit and run trial, and provided reactions to the case. In Study 1, the three randomly assigned conditions included a prompt to empathize with the victims, the empathy prompt with a mortality salience manipulation, and a control condition. Participants high in trait empathy were harsher in their judgments of the defendant than were low empathy participants, particularly after having read the mortality salience prompt. The results indicated that mortality salience had triggered personality differences. Participants high in social dominance assigned harsher sentences across conditions. Study 2 involved the same paradigm, but the prompts were presented on behalf of the defendant. Despite the pro-defendant slant, the pattern of results was similar to Study 1. Differences by trait empathy were more apparent among participants experiencing mortality salience, and social dominance was related to sentence choices. There were no indications in either study of mortality salience increasing bias against defendants in general or increasing racial bias.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016629185
work_keys_str_mv AT donnacrawley empathysocialdominanceorientationmortalitysalienceandperceptionsofacriminaldefendant
AT richardsuarez empathysocialdominanceorientationmortalitysalienceandperceptionsofacriminaldefendant
_version_ 1724609649174380544