Empathy, Social Dominance Orientation, Mortality Salience, and Perceptions of a Criminal Defendant
In two studies, participants completed measures of trait empathy and social dominance orientation, read a summary of a hit and run trial, and provided reactions to the case. In Study 1, the three randomly assigned conditions included a prompt to empathize with the victims, the empathy prompt with a...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2016-02-01
|
Series: | SAGE Open |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016629185 |
id |
doaj-e55f0e8ef65144e1aead541c2d9f28b9 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-e55f0e8ef65144e1aead541c2d9f28b92020-11-25T03:22:47ZengSAGE PublishingSAGE Open2158-24402016-02-01610.1177/215824401662918510.1177_2158244016629185Empathy, Social Dominance Orientation, Mortality Salience, and Perceptions of a Criminal DefendantDonna Crawley0Richard Suarez1Ramapo College of New Jersey, Mahwah, USARamapo College of New Jersey, Mahwah, USAIn two studies, participants completed measures of trait empathy and social dominance orientation, read a summary of a hit and run trial, and provided reactions to the case. In Study 1, the three randomly assigned conditions included a prompt to empathize with the victims, the empathy prompt with a mortality salience manipulation, and a control condition. Participants high in trait empathy were harsher in their judgments of the defendant than were low empathy participants, particularly after having read the mortality salience prompt. The results indicated that mortality salience had triggered personality differences. Participants high in social dominance assigned harsher sentences across conditions. Study 2 involved the same paradigm, but the prompts were presented on behalf of the defendant. Despite the pro-defendant slant, the pattern of results was similar to Study 1. Differences by trait empathy were more apparent among participants experiencing mortality salience, and social dominance was related to sentence choices. There were no indications in either study of mortality salience increasing bias against defendants in general or increasing racial bias.https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016629185 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Donna Crawley Richard Suarez |
spellingShingle |
Donna Crawley Richard Suarez Empathy, Social Dominance Orientation, Mortality Salience, and Perceptions of a Criminal Defendant SAGE Open |
author_facet |
Donna Crawley Richard Suarez |
author_sort |
Donna Crawley |
title |
Empathy, Social Dominance Orientation, Mortality Salience, and Perceptions of a Criminal Defendant |
title_short |
Empathy, Social Dominance Orientation, Mortality Salience, and Perceptions of a Criminal Defendant |
title_full |
Empathy, Social Dominance Orientation, Mortality Salience, and Perceptions of a Criminal Defendant |
title_fullStr |
Empathy, Social Dominance Orientation, Mortality Salience, and Perceptions of a Criminal Defendant |
title_full_unstemmed |
Empathy, Social Dominance Orientation, Mortality Salience, and Perceptions of a Criminal Defendant |
title_sort |
empathy, social dominance orientation, mortality salience, and perceptions of a criminal defendant |
publisher |
SAGE Publishing |
series |
SAGE Open |
issn |
2158-2440 |
publishDate |
2016-02-01 |
description |
In two studies, participants completed measures of trait empathy and social dominance orientation, read a summary of a hit and run trial, and provided reactions to the case. In Study 1, the three randomly assigned conditions included a prompt to empathize with the victims, the empathy prompt with a mortality salience manipulation, and a control condition. Participants high in trait empathy were harsher in their judgments of the defendant than were low empathy participants, particularly after having read the mortality salience prompt. The results indicated that mortality salience had triggered personality differences. Participants high in social dominance assigned harsher sentences across conditions. Study 2 involved the same paradigm, but the prompts were presented on behalf of the defendant. Despite the pro-defendant slant, the pattern of results was similar to Study 1. Differences by trait empathy were more apparent among participants experiencing mortality salience, and social dominance was related to sentence choices. There were no indications in either study of mortality salience increasing bias against defendants in general or increasing racial bias. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016629185 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT donnacrawley empathysocialdominanceorientationmortalitysalienceandperceptionsofacriminaldefendant AT richardsuarez empathysocialdominanceorientationmortalitysalienceandperceptionsofacriminaldefendant |
_version_ |
1724609649174380544 |