De la controverse à la conversion : Venise et la défense de la rhétorique dans The Ephemerides of Phialo de Stephen Gosson

Controversy was raging in England in the late 1570s and early 1580s as Puritans attacked the evils of the age and above all the stage. Stephen Gosson is well-known for having joined the anti-theatrical polemics in his Schoole of Abuse. However, this article will focus on his less known euphuistic fi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Anne Geoffroy-Piscou
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Maison de la Recherche en Sciences Humaines 2008-03-01
Series:Revue LISA
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/lisa/371
id doaj-e55efda461094359bd75337aff14c145
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e55efda461094359bd75337aff14c1452021-10-02T03:19:54ZengMaison de la Recherche en Sciences HumainesRevue LISA1762-61532008-03-01405010.4000/lisa.371De la controverse à la conversion : Venise et la défense de la rhétorique dans The Ephemerides of Phialo de Stephen GossonAnne Geoffroy-PiscouControversy was raging in England in the late 1570s and early 1580s as Puritans attacked the evils of the age and above all the stage. Stephen Gosson is well-known for having joined the anti-theatrical polemics in his Schoole of Abuse. However, this article will focus on his less known euphuistic fiction entitled The Ephemerides of Phialo (1579) which he had actually started just before writing his attack on the misuse of art. The fact that Gosson chose to locate his prose fiction in Venice is highly significant and this study argues that the city’s association with vices provides an appropriate, though paradoxical, setting for Gosson’s defence of rhetoric at the expense of fiction. Furthermore, Gosson’s representation of Venice as a “colledge of curtezans” should be viewed against his own attempt to resume his studies at Corpus Christi. Ultimately, if Gosson failed to secure Sir Philip Sidney’s patronage—despite dedicating The Ephemerides to Sidney—he contributed to including and furthering the image of Venice within the field of prose fiction while denouncing the very evils of fiction itself.http://journals.openedition.org/lisa/371
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Anne Geoffroy-Piscou
spellingShingle Anne Geoffroy-Piscou
De la controverse à la conversion : Venise et la défense de la rhétorique dans The Ephemerides of Phialo de Stephen Gosson
Revue LISA
author_facet Anne Geoffroy-Piscou
author_sort Anne Geoffroy-Piscou
title De la controverse à la conversion : Venise et la défense de la rhétorique dans The Ephemerides of Phialo de Stephen Gosson
title_short De la controverse à la conversion : Venise et la défense de la rhétorique dans The Ephemerides of Phialo de Stephen Gosson
title_full De la controverse à la conversion : Venise et la défense de la rhétorique dans The Ephemerides of Phialo de Stephen Gosson
title_fullStr De la controverse à la conversion : Venise et la défense de la rhétorique dans The Ephemerides of Phialo de Stephen Gosson
title_full_unstemmed De la controverse à la conversion : Venise et la défense de la rhétorique dans The Ephemerides of Phialo de Stephen Gosson
title_sort de la controverse à la conversion : venise et la défense de la rhétorique dans the ephemerides of phialo de stephen gosson
publisher Maison de la Recherche en Sciences Humaines
series Revue LISA
issn 1762-6153
publishDate 2008-03-01
description Controversy was raging in England in the late 1570s and early 1580s as Puritans attacked the evils of the age and above all the stage. Stephen Gosson is well-known for having joined the anti-theatrical polemics in his Schoole of Abuse. However, this article will focus on his less known euphuistic fiction entitled The Ephemerides of Phialo (1579) which he had actually started just before writing his attack on the misuse of art. The fact that Gosson chose to locate his prose fiction in Venice is highly significant and this study argues that the city’s association with vices provides an appropriate, though paradoxical, setting for Gosson’s defence of rhetoric at the expense of fiction. Furthermore, Gosson’s representation of Venice as a “colledge of curtezans” should be viewed against his own attempt to resume his studies at Corpus Christi. Ultimately, if Gosson failed to secure Sir Philip Sidney’s patronage—despite dedicating The Ephemerides to Sidney—he contributed to including and furthering the image of Venice within the field of prose fiction while denouncing the very evils of fiction itself.
url http://journals.openedition.org/lisa/371
work_keys_str_mv AT annegeoffroypiscou delacontroversealaconversionveniseetladefensedelarhetoriquedanstheephemeridesofphialodestephengosson
_version_ 1716860109795098624