Estimates of probable dementia prevalence from population-based surveys compared with dementia prevalence estimates based on meta-analyses

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>National data on dementia prevalence are not always available, yet it may be possible to obtain estimates from large surveys that include dementia screening instruments. In Australia, many of the dementia prevalence estimates are bas...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kiely Kim M, Steel David, Birrell Carole L, Burns Richard A, Anstey Kaarin J, Luszcz Mary A
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2010-07-01
Series:BMC Neurology
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2377/10/62
id doaj-e552026c8a2c408a8b3c45febfc264dc
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e552026c8a2c408a8b3c45febfc264dc2020-11-25T00:15:11ZengBMCBMC Neurology1471-23772010-07-011016210.1186/1471-2377-10-62Estimates of probable dementia prevalence from population-based surveys compared with dementia prevalence estimates based on meta-analysesKiely Kim MSteel DavidBirrell Carole LBurns Richard AAnstey Kaarin JLuszcz Mary A<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>National data on dementia prevalence are not always available, yet it may be possible to obtain estimates from large surveys that include dementia screening instruments. In Australia, many of the dementia prevalence estimates are based on European data collected between 15 and 50 years ago. We derived population-based estimates of probable dementia and possible cognitive impairment in Australian studies using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), and compared these to estimates of dementia prevalence from meta-analyses of European studies.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Data sources included a pooled dataset of Australian longitudinal studies (DYNOPTA), and two Australian Bureau of Statistics National Surveys of Mental Health and Wellbeing. National rates of probable dementia (MMSE < 24) and possible cognitive impairment (24-26) were estimated using combined sample weights.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Estimates of probable dementia were higher in surveys than in meta-analyses for ages 65-84, but were similar at ages 85 and older. Surveys used weights to account for sample bias, but no adjustments were made in meta-analyses. Results from DYNOPTA and meta-analyses had a very similar pattern of increase with age. Contrary to trends from some meta-analyses, rates of probable dementia were not higher among women in the Australian surveys. Lower education was associated with higher prevalence of probable dementia. Data from investigator-led longitudinal studies designed to assess cognitive decline appeared more reliable than government health surveys.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>This study shows that estimates of probable dementia based on MMSE in studies where cognitive decline and dementia are a focus, are a useful adjunct to clinical studies of dementia prevalence. Such information and may be used to inform projections of dementia prevalence and the concomitant burden of disease.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2377/10/62
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kiely Kim M
Steel David
Birrell Carole L
Burns Richard A
Anstey Kaarin J
Luszcz Mary A
spellingShingle Kiely Kim M
Steel David
Birrell Carole L
Burns Richard A
Anstey Kaarin J
Luszcz Mary A
Estimates of probable dementia prevalence from population-based surveys compared with dementia prevalence estimates based on meta-analyses
BMC Neurology
author_facet Kiely Kim M
Steel David
Birrell Carole L
Burns Richard A
Anstey Kaarin J
Luszcz Mary A
author_sort Kiely Kim M
title Estimates of probable dementia prevalence from population-based surveys compared with dementia prevalence estimates based on meta-analyses
title_short Estimates of probable dementia prevalence from population-based surveys compared with dementia prevalence estimates based on meta-analyses
title_full Estimates of probable dementia prevalence from population-based surveys compared with dementia prevalence estimates based on meta-analyses
title_fullStr Estimates of probable dementia prevalence from population-based surveys compared with dementia prevalence estimates based on meta-analyses
title_full_unstemmed Estimates of probable dementia prevalence from population-based surveys compared with dementia prevalence estimates based on meta-analyses
title_sort estimates of probable dementia prevalence from population-based surveys compared with dementia prevalence estimates based on meta-analyses
publisher BMC
series BMC Neurology
issn 1471-2377
publishDate 2010-07-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>National data on dementia prevalence are not always available, yet it may be possible to obtain estimates from large surveys that include dementia screening instruments. In Australia, many of the dementia prevalence estimates are based on European data collected between 15 and 50 years ago. We derived population-based estimates of probable dementia and possible cognitive impairment in Australian studies using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), and compared these to estimates of dementia prevalence from meta-analyses of European studies.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Data sources included a pooled dataset of Australian longitudinal studies (DYNOPTA), and two Australian Bureau of Statistics National Surveys of Mental Health and Wellbeing. National rates of probable dementia (MMSE < 24) and possible cognitive impairment (24-26) were estimated using combined sample weights.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Estimates of probable dementia were higher in surveys than in meta-analyses for ages 65-84, but were similar at ages 85 and older. Surveys used weights to account for sample bias, but no adjustments were made in meta-analyses. Results from DYNOPTA and meta-analyses had a very similar pattern of increase with age. Contrary to trends from some meta-analyses, rates of probable dementia were not higher among women in the Australian surveys. Lower education was associated with higher prevalence of probable dementia. Data from investigator-led longitudinal studies designed to assess cognitive decline appeared more reliable than government health surveys.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>This study shows that estimates of probable dementia based on MMSE in studies where cognitive decline and dementia are a focus, are a useful adjunct to clinical studies of dementia prevalence. Such information and may be used to inform projections of dementia prevalence and the concomitant burden of disease.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2377/10/62
work_keys_str_mv AT kielykimm estimatesofprobabledementiaprevalencefrompopulationbasedsurveyscomparedwithdementiaprevalenceestimatesbasedonmetaanalyses
AT steeldavid estimatesofprobabledementiaprevalencefrompopulationbasedsurveyscomparedwithdementiaprevalenceestimatesbasedonmetaanalyses
AT birrellcarolel estimatesofprobabledementiaprevalencefrompopulationbasedsurveyscomparedwithdementiaprevalenceestimatesbasedonmetaanalyses
AT burnsricharda estimatesofprobabledementiaprevalencefrompopulationbasedsurveyscomparedwithdementiaprevalenceestimatesbasedonmetaanalyses
AT ansteykaarinj estimatesofprobabledementiaprevalencefrompopulationbasedsurveyscomparedwithdementiaprevalenceestimatesbasedonmetaanalyses
AT luszczmarya estimatesofprobabledementiaprevalencefrompopulationbasedsurveyscomparedwithdementiaprevalenceestimatesbasedonmetaanalyses
_version_ 1725388221850845184