Valenced cues and contexts have different effects on event-based prospective memory.

This study examined the separate influence and joint influences on event-based prospective memory task performance due to the valence of cues and the valence of contexts. We manipulated the valence of cues and contexts with pictures from the International Affective Picture System. The participants,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Peter Graf, Martin Yu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2015-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4315430?pdf=render
id doaj-e54e8e02c6a04c31ad0117afb3432d56
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e54e8e02c6a04c31ad0117afb3432d562020-11-24T21:56:58ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032015-01-01102e011695310.1371/journal.pone.0116953Valenced cues and contexts have different effects on event-based prospective memory.Peter GrafMartin YuThis study examined the separate influence and joint influences on event-based prospective memory task performance due to the valence of cues and the valence of contexts. We manipulated the valence of cues and contexts with pictures from the International Affective Picture System. The participants, undergraduate students, showed higher performance when neutral compared to valenced pictures were used for cueing prospective memory. In addition, neutral pictures were more effective as cues when they occurred in a valenced context than in the context of neutral pictures, but the effectiveness of valenced cues did not vary across contexts that differed in valence. The finding of an interaction between cue and context valence indicates that their respective influence on event-based prospective memory task performance cannot be understood in isolation from each other. Our findings are not consistent with by the prevailing view which holds that the scope of attention is broadened and narrowed, respectively, by positively and negatively valenced stimuli. Instead, our findings are more supportive of the recent proposal that the scope of attention is determined by the motivational intensity associated with valenced stimuli. Consistent with this proposal, we speculate that the motivational intensity associated with different retrieval cues determines the scope of attention, that contexts with different valence values determine participants' task engagement, and that prospective memory task performance is determined jointly by attention scope and task engagement.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4315430?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Peter Graf
Martin Yu
spellingShingle Peter Graf
Martin Yu
Valenced cues and contexts have different effects on event-based prospective memory.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Peter Graf
Martin Yu
author_sort Peter Graf
title Valenced cues and contexts have different effects on event-based prospective memory.
title_short Valenced cues and contexts have different effects on event-based prospective memory.
title_full Valenced cues and contexts have different effects on event-based prospective memory.
title_fullStr Valenced cues and contexts have different effects on event-based prospective memory.
title_full_unstemmed Valenced cues and contexts have different effects on event-based prospective memory.
title_sort valenced cues and contexts have different effects on event-based prospective memory.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2015-01-01
description This study examined the separate influence and joint influences on event-based prospective memory task performance due to the valence of cues and the valence of contexts. We manipulated the valence of cues and contexts with pictures from the International Affective Picture System. The participants, undergraduate students, showed higher performance when neutral compared to valenced pictures were used for cueing prospective memory. In addition, neutral pictures were more effective as cues when they occurred in a valenced context than in the context of neutral pictures, but the effectiveness of valenced cues did not vary across contexts that differed in valence. The finding of an interaction between cue and context valence indicates that their respective influence on event-based prospective memory task performance cannot be understood in isolation from each other. Our findings are not consistent with by the prevailing view which holds that the scope of attention is broadened and narrowed, respectively, by positively and negatively valenced stimuli. Instead, our findings are more supportive of the recent proposal that the scope of attention is determined by the motivational intensity associated with valenced stimuli. Consistent with this proposal, we speculate that the motivational intensity associated with different retrieval cues determines the scope of attention, that contexts with different valence values determine participants' task engagement, and that prospective memory task performance is determined jointly by attention scope and task engagement.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4315430?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT petergraf valencedcuesandcontextshavedifferenteffectsoneventbasedprospectivememory
AT martinyu valencedcuesandcontextshavedifferenteffectsoneventbasedprospectivememory
_version_ 1725856085391179776