Repeatability of small field output factor measurements with various detectors

There are well established dosimetry reference standards for broad beams; however, there are no reference standards that can be used for both broad and small fields. The variation of the equivalent square fields and field output factors in small static photon fields when using a synthetic diamond, a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zakithi Lungile Mpumelelo Msimang, Debbie van der Merwe, Nkosingiphile Maphumulo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2021-01-01
Series:Journal of Medical Physics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jmp.org.in/article.asp?issn=0971-6203;year=2021;volume=46;issue=1;spage=47;epage=51;aulast=Msimang
id doaj-e53c92684fe1481daea8c52f0a827139
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e53c92684fe1481daea8c52f0a8271392021-06-02T09:31:01ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Medical Physics0971-62031998-39132021-01-01461475110.4103/jmp.JMP_93_20Repeatability of small field output factor measurements with various detectorsZakithi Lungile Mpumelelo MsimangDebbie van der MerweNkosingiphile MaphumuloThere are well established dosimetry reference standards for broad beams; however, there are no reference standards that can be used for both broad and small fields. The variation of the equivalent square fields and field output factors in small static photon fields when using a synthetic diamond, an electron diode, and ionization chambers (pin point, semiflex, and liquid filled) was investigated over time. Data from this study were compared to the data from other hospitals in the country and standard data sets, i.e., the British Journal of Radiology Supplement No. 25 of 1996 (BJR25) and the Radiological Physics Centre (RPC) 2012 data. The results showed that reliance on one detector and one measurement session, could yield incorrect field output factors (FOFs) for small fields. At least one of the detectors should be a solid state type with published field output correction factors and at least three measurement sessions should be performed for each FOF data point. Comparing measured data with published datasets, like RPC, will assist in verifying data. BJR25 datasets should not be used for Sclin ≤4 cm.http://www.jmp.org.in/article.asp?issn=0971-6203;year=2021;volume=46;issue=1;spage=47;epage=51;aulast=Msimangaccurateequivalent square fieldfield output factorreference dosimetry
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Zakithi Lungile Mpumelelo Msimang
Debbie van der Merwe
Nkosingiphile Maphumulo
spellingShingle Zakithi Lungile Mpumelelo Msimang
Debbie van der Merwe
Nkosingiphile Maphumulo
Repeatability of small field output factor measurements with various detectors
Journal of Medical Physics
accurate
equivalent square field
field output factor
reference dosimetry
author_facet Zakithi Lungile Mpumelelo Msimang
Debbie van der Merwe
Nkosingiphile Maphumulo
author_sort Zakithi Lungile Mpumelelo Msimang
title Repeatability of small field output factor measurements with various detectors
title_short Repeatability of small field output factor measurements with various detectors
title_full Repeatability of small field output factor measurements with various detectors
title_fullStr Repeatability of small field output factor measurements with various detectors
title_full_unstemmed Repeatability of small field output factor measurements with various detectors
title_sort repeatability of small field output factor measurements with various detectors
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Journal of Medical Physics
issn 0971-6203
1998-3913
publishDate 2021-01-01
description There are well established dosimetry reference standards for broad beams; however, there are no reference standards that can be used for both broad and small fields. The variation of the equivalent square fields and field output factors in small static photon fields when using a synthetic diamond, an electron diode, and ionization chambers (pin point, semiflex, and liquid filled) was investigated over time. Data from this study were compared to the data from other hospitals in the country and standard data sets, i.e., the British Journal of Radiology Supplement No. 25 of 1996 (BJR25) and the Radiological Physics Centre (RPC) 2012 data. The results showed that reliance on one detector and one measurement session, could yield incorrect field output factors (FOFs) for small fields. At least one of the detectors should be a solid state type with published field output correction factors and at least three measurement sessions should be performed for each FOF data point. Comparing measured data with published datasets, like RPC, will assist in verifying data. BJR25 datasets should not be used for Sclin ≤4 cm.
topic accurate
equivalent square field
field output factor
reference dosimetry
url http://www.jmp.org.in/article.asp?issn=0971-6203;year=2021;volume=46;issue=1;spage=47;epage=51;aulast=Msimang
work_keys_str_mv AT zakithilungilempumelelomsimang repeatabilityofsmallfieldoutputfactormeasurementswithvariousdetectors
AT debbievandermerwe repeatabilityofsmallfieldoutputfactormeasurementswithvariousdetectors
AT nkosingiphilemaphumulo repeatabilityofsmallfieldoutputfactormeasurementswithvariousdetectors
_version_ 1721405727647465472