Effectiveness and safety of long-acting versus short acting methylphenidate in ADHD in population between 6 and 19 years: a systematic review

Introduction: Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is generally treated with short-acting methylphenidate, but recently a long-acting presentation has been introduced, hence the interest of the study to evaluate the two formulations. Purpse: To identify, synthesize and evaluate the best a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: José Calleja, José Uribarri
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Medwave Estudios Limitada 2012-09-01
Series:Medwave
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.5867/medwave.2012.08.5476
id doaj-e53a6d01a1d74a41a4a5a7f2e72f955f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e53a6d01a1d74a41a4a5a7f2e72f955f2020-11-25T01:30:27ZengMedwave Estudios LimitadaMedwave0717-63842012-09-011208e5476Effectiveness and safety of long-acting versus short acting methylphenidate in ADHD in population between 6 and 19 years: a systematic reviewJosé CallejaJosé UribarriIntroduction: Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is generally treated with short-acting methylphenidate, but recently a long-acting presentation has been introduced, hence the interest of the study to evaluate the two formulations. Purpse: To identify, synthesize and evaluate the best available evidence on the effectiveness and safety of long-acting methylphenidate versus short-acting treatment for ADHD in the 6-19 year-old population. Methods: A systematic review of intervention studies comparing the two presentations of methylphenidate was conducted. Effectiveness was measured in terms of educational performance, psychosocial functioning, quality of life and adverse effects. Databases were searched until February 2012 in English and Spanish: PubMed/MEDLINE, Lilacs, Cochrane, DARE and National Guideline Clearinghouse. The studies were evaluated by two investigators independently. Results: Of the 18 studies found initially, six were included, among which a systematic review, a primary article on therapeutic interventions and four clinical guidelines. Conclusions: Long-acting methylphenidate is not superior to short-acting methylphenidate in terms of educational performance, psychosocial functioning, quality of life. Few adverse effects were found in the treatment of patients between 6 and 19 years old with attention deficit disorder. http://dx.doi.org/10.5867/medwave.2012.08.5476attention deficit disorder with hyperactivitymethylphenidatesystematic review
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author José Calleja
José Uribarri
spellingShingle José Calleja
José Uribarri
Effectiveness and safety of long-acting versus short acting methylphenidate in ADHD in population between 6 and 19 years: a systematic review
Medwave
attention deficit disorder with hyperactivity
methylphenidate
systematic review
author_facet José Calleja
José Uribarri
author_sort José Calleja
title Effectiveness and safety of long-acting versus short acting methylphenidate in ADHD in population between 6 and 19 years: a systematic review
title_short Effectiveness and safety of long-acting versus short acting methylphenidate in ADHD in population between 6 and 19 years: a systematic review
title_full Effectiveness and safety of long-acting versus short acting methylphenidate in ADHD in population between 6 and 19 years: a systematic review
title_fullStr Effectiveness and safety of long-acting versus short acting methylphenidate in ADHD in population between 6 and 19 years: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness and safety of long-acting versus short acting methylphenidate in ADHD in population between 6 and 19 years: a systematic review
title_sort effectiveness and safety of long-acting versus short acting methylphenidate in adhd in population between 6 and 19 years: a systematic review
publisher Medwave Estudios Limitada
series Medwave
issn 0717-6384
publishDate 2012-09-01
description Introduction: Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is generally treated with short-acting methylphenidate, but recently a long-acting presentation has been introduced, hence the interest of the study to evaluate the two formulations. Purpse: To identify, synthesize and evaluate the best available evidence on the effectiveness and safety of long-acting methylphenidate versus short-acting treatment for ADHD in the 6-19 year-old population. Methods: A systematic review of intervention studies comparing the two presentations of methylphenidate was conducted. Effectiveness was measured in terms of educational performance, psychosocial functioning, quality of life and adverse effects. Databases were searched until February 2012 in English and Spanish: PubMed/MEDLINE, Lilacs, Cochrane, DARE and National Guideline Clearinghouse. The studies were evaluated by two investigators independently. Results: Of the 18 studies found initially, six were included, among which a systematic review, a primary article on therapeutic interventions and four clinical guidelines. Conclusions: Long-acting methylphenidate is not superior to short-acting methylphenidate in terms of educational performance, psychosocial functioning, quality of life. Few adverse effects were found in the treatment of patients between 6 and 19 years old with attention deficit disorder.
topic attention deficit disorder with hyperactivity
methylphenidate
systematic review
url http://dx.doi.org/10.5867/medwave.2012.08.5476
work_keys_str_mv AT josecalleja effectivenessandsafetyoflongactingversusshortactingmethylphenidateinadhdinpopulationbetween6and19yearsasystematicreview
AT joseuribarri effectivenessandsafetyoflongactingversusshortactingmethylphenidateinadhdinpopulationbetween6and19yearsasystematicreview
_version_ 1725091338675814400