The birth of a wild God
In the eighteenth century, both critics and connoisseurs of art arrivedto a common agreement concerning the particular features that maycharacterize the different artistic practices. Since the Renaissance,one particular question floated in the air: What do dance, theater,music, painting and drawing...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Spanish |
Published: |
Universidad Pedagógica Nacional
2013-08-01
|
Series: | Pensamiento Palabra y Obra |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://revistas.pedagogica.edu.co/index.php/revistafba/article/view/1933 |
id |
doaj-e5373f2cd3364fcea925733b48da83b4 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-e5373f2cd3364fcea925733b48da83b42020-11-24T21:47:59ZspaUniversidad Pedagógica Nacional Pensamiento Palabra y Obra2011-804X2013-08-010910.17227/2011804X.9PPO6.131593The birth of a wild GodXimena Velásquez Sánchez0Universidad Pedagógica NacionalIn the eighteenth century, both critics and connoisseurs of art arrivedto a common agreement concerning the particular features that maycharacterize the different artistic practices. Since the Renaissance,one particular question floated in the air: What do dance, theater,music, painting and drawing have in common, so that they might besummarized by a single term? The word “Beauty” was then raised as aflag, providing the public as well as the Academies with a satisfactoryanswer. The mystery was therefore apparently solved, while at thesame time the term “Fine Arts” spread all over the world and becameuniversally accepted. Nevertheless, this agreement would awake thewrath of a particular group of artists, led by Alfred Jarry, who in thelate nineteenth century staged the controversial character “FatherUbú”, in the puppet play King Ubu, a character who, for the very firsttime, dares to utter an obscenity in the theater. The audience, compo-sed of spectators who had developed a passive consumption of art as a means to find acceptance and enjoymentwithin a prestigious social group, were utterly shaken in their seats, only to understand that a new kind of aesthetics was born in the arts, from then on able to pin-point the weaknesses, vices and defects of many respected people.http://revistas.pedagogica.edu.co/index.php/revistafba/article/view/1933EstéticaBellas artesMerdreIrreverenciaCrítica social. |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
Spanish |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Ximena Velásquez Sánchez |
spellingShingle |
Ximena Velásquez Sánchez The birth of a wild God Pensamiento Palabra y Obra Estética Bellas artes Merdre Irreverencia Crítica social. |
author_facet |
Ximena Velásquez Sánchez |
author_sort |
Ximena Velásquez Sánchez |
title |
The birth of a wild God |
title_short |
The birth of a wild God |
title_full |
The birth of a wild God |
title_fullStr |
The birth of a wild God |
title_full_unstemmed |
The birth of a wild God |
title_sort |
birth of a wild god |
publisher |
Universidad Pedagógica Nacional |
series |
Pensamiento Palabra y Obra |
issn |
2011-804X |
publishDate |
2013-08-01 |
description |
In the eighteenth century, both critics and connoisseurs of art arrivedto a common agreement concerning the particular features that maycharacterize the different artistic practices. Since the Renaissance,one particular question floated in the air: What do dance, theater,music, painting and drawing have in common, so that they might besummarized by a single term? The word “Beauty” was then raised as aflag, providing the public as well as the Academies with a satisfactoryanswer. The mystery was therefore apparently solved, while at thesame time the term “Fine Arts” spread all over the world and becameuniversally accepted. Nevertheless, this agreement would awake thewrath of a particular group of artists, led by Alfred Jarry, who in thelate nineteenth century staged the controversial character “FatherUbú”, in the puppet play King Ubu, a character who, for the very firsttime, dares to utter an obscenity in the theater. The audience, compo-sed of spectators who had developed a passive consumption of art as a means to find acceptance and enjoymentwithin a prestigious social group, were utterly shaken in their seats, only to understand that a new kind of aesthetics was born in the arts, from then on able to pin-point the weaknesses, vices and defects of many respected people. |
topic |
Estética Bellas artes Merdre Irreverencia Crítica social. |
url |
http://revistas.pedagogica.edu.co/index.php/revistafba/article/view/1933 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT ximenavelasquezsanchez thebirthofawildgod AT ximenavelasquezsanchez birthofawildgod |
_version_ |
1725894073685901312 |