Neural mechanisms of response-preparation and inhibition in bilingual and monolingual children: Lateralized Readiness Potentials (LRPs) during a nonverbal Stroop task

Inhibitory control is a core executive function (EF) skill, thought to involve cognitive ‘interference suppression’ and motor ‘response inhibition’ sub-processes. A few studies have shown that early bilingualism shapes interference suppression but not response inhibition skills, however current beha...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Srishti Nayak, Hiba Z. Salem, Amanda R. Tarullo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2020-02-01
Series:Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878929319303275
id doaj-e536b06588d548309159607130cd9074
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e536b06588d548309159607130cd90742020-11-24T23:59:31ZengElsevierDevelopmental Cognitive Neuroscience1878-92932020-02-0141Neural mechanisms of response-preparation and inhibition in bilingual and monolingual children: Lateralized Readiness Potentials (LRPs) during a nonverbal Stroop taskSrishti Nayak0Hiba Z. Salem1Amanda R. Tarullo2Princeton Writing Program, 2 New South, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, 08544, USA; Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Boston University, 64 Cummington Mall, Boston, MA, 02215, USA; Corresponding author at: Princeton Writing Program, 2 New South, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, 08544, USA.Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Boston University, 64 Cummington Mall, Boston, MA, 02215, USADepartment of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Boston University, 64 Cummington Mall, Boston, MA, 02215, USAInhibitory control is a core executive function (EF) skill, thought to involve cognitive ‘interference suppression’ and motor ‘response inhibition’ sub-processes. A few studies have shown that early bilingualism shapes interference suppression but not response inhibition skills, however current behavioral measures do not fully allow us to disentangle these subcomponents. Lateralized Readiness Potentials (LRPs) are centroparietal event-related potentials (ERPs) that track motor response-preparations between stimulus-presentation and behavioral responses. We examine LRPs elicited during successful inhibitory control on a nonverbal Stroop task, in 6–8 year-old bilingual (n = 44) and monolingual (n = 48) children from comparable socio-economic backgrounds. Relative to monolinguals, bilinguals showed longer and stronger incorrect-response preparations, and a more mature pattern of correct-response preparation (shorter peak-latencies), underlying correct responses on Stroop-interference trials. Neural markers of response-inhibition were comparable between groups and no behavioral differences were found between-groups on the Stroop task. Results suggest group differences in underlying mechanisms of centroparietal motor-response preparation mechanisms in this age group, contrary to what has been shown using behavioral tasks previously. We discuss neural results in the context of speed-accuracy trade-offs. This is the first study to examine neural markers of motor-responses in bilingual children. Keywords: Inhibitory control, Bilingual children, Lateralized readiness potentials (LRP), Event-related potentials (ERP), Response inhibition, Stroop taskhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878929319303275
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Srishti Nayak
Hiba Z. Salem
Amanda R. Tarullo
spellingShingle Srishti Nayak
Hiba Z. Salem
Amanda R. Tarullo
Neural mechanisms of response-preparation and inhibition in bilingual and monolingual children: Lateralized Readiness Potentials (LRPs) during a nonverbal Stroop task
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
author_facet Srishti Nayak
Hiba Z. Salem
Amanda R. Tarullo
author_sort Srishti Nayak
title Neural mechanisms of response-preparation and inhibition in bilingual and monolingual children: Lateralized Readiness Potentials (LRPs) during a nonverbal Stroop task
title_short Neural mechanisms of response-preparation and inhibition in bilingual and monolingual children: Lateralized Readiness Potentials (LRPs) during a nonverbal Stroop task
title_full Neural mechanisms of response-preparation and inhibition in bilingual and monolingual children: Lateralized Readiness Potentials (LRPs) during a nonverbal Stroop task
title_fullStr Neural mechanisms of response-preparation and inhibition in bilingual and monolingual children: Lateralized Readiness Potentials (LRPs) during a nonverbal Stroop task
title_full_unstemmed Neural mechanisms of response-preparation and inhibition in bilingual and monolingual children: Lateralized Readiness Potentials (LRPs) during a nonverbal Stroop task
title_sort neural mechanisms of response-preparation and inhibition in bilingual and monolingual children: lateralized readiness potentials (lrps) during a nonverbal stroop task
publisher Elsevier
series Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
issn 1878-9293
publishDate 2020-02-01
description Inhibitory control is a core executive function (EF) skill, thought to involve cognitive ‘interference suppression’ and motor ‘response inhibition’ sub-processes. A few studies have shown that early bilingualism shapes interference suppression but not response inhibition skills, however current behavioral measures do not fully allow us to disentangle these subcomponents. Lateralized Readiness Potentials (LRPs) are centroparietal event-related potentials (ERPs) that track motor response-preparations between stimulus-presentation and behavioral responses. We examine LRPs elicited during successful inhibitory control on a nonverbal Stroop task, in 6–8 year-old bilingual (n = 44) and monolingual (n = 48) children from comparable socio-economic backgrounds. Relative to monolinguals, bilinguals showed longer and stronger incorrect-response preparations, and a more mature pattern of correct-response preparation (shorter peak-latencies), underlying correct responses on Stroop-interference trials. Neural markers of response-inhibition were comparable between groups and no behavioral differences were found between-groups on the Stroop task. Results suggest group differences in underlying mechanisms of centroparietal motor-response preparation mechanisms in this age group, contrary to what has been shown using behavioral tasks previously. We discuss neural results in the context of speed-accuracy trade-offs. This is the first study to examine neural markers of motor-responses in bilingual children. Keywords: Inhibitory control, Bilingual children, Lateralized readiness potentials (LRP), Event-related potentials (ERP), Response inhibition, Stroop task
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878929319303275
work_keys_str_mv AT srishtinayak neuralmechanismsofresponsepreparationandinhibitioninbilingualandmonolingualchildrenlateralizedreadinesspotentialslrpsduringanonverbalstrooptask
AT hibazsalem neuralmechanismsofresponsepreparationandinhibitioninbilingualandmonolingualchildrenlateralizedreadinesspotentialslrpsduringanonverbalstrooptask
AT amandartarullo neuralmechanismsofresponsepreparationandinhibitioninbilingualandmonolingualchildrenlateralizedreadinesspotentialslrpsduringanonverbalstrooptask
_version_ 1725447632289005568