Neural mechanisms of response-preparation and inhibition in bilingual and monolingual children: Lateralized Readiness Potentials (LRPs) during a nonverbal Stroop task
Inhibitory control is a core executive function (EF) skill, thought to involve cognitive ‘interference suppression’ and motor ‘response inhibition’ sub-processes. A few studies have shown that early bilingualism shapes interference suppression but not response inhibition skills, however current beha...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2020-02-01
|
Series: | Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878929319303275 |
id |
doaj-e536b06588d548309159607130cd9074 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-e536b06588d548309159607130cd90742020-11-24T23:59:31ZengElsevierDevelopmental Cognitive Neuroscience1878-92932020-02-0141Neural mechanisms of response-preparation and inhibition in bilingual and monolingual children: Lateralized Readiness Potentials (LRPs) during a nonverbal Stroop taskSrishti Nayak0Hiba Z. Salem1Amanda R. Tarullo2Princeton Writing Program, 2 New South, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, 08544, USA; Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Boston University, 64 Cummington Mall, Boston, MA, 02215, USA; Corresponding author at: Princeton Writing Program, 2 New South, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, 08544, USA.Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Boston University, 64 Cummington Mall, Boston, MA, 02215, USADepartment of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Boston University, 64 Cummington Mall, Boston, MA, 02215, USAInhibitory control is a core executive function (EF) skill, thought to involve cognitive ‘interference suppression’ and motor ‘response inhibition’ sub-processes. A few studies have shown that early bilingualism shapes interference suppression but not response inhibition skills, however current behavioral measures do not fully allow us to disentangle these subcomponents. Lateralized Readiness Potentials (LRPs) are centroparietal event-related potentials (ERPs) that track motor response-preparations between stimulus-presentation and behavioral responses. We examine LRPs elicited during successful inhibitory control on a nonverbal Stroop task, in 6–8 year-old bilingual (n = 44) and monolingual (n = 48) children from comparable socio-economic backgrounds. Relative to monolinguals, bilinguals showed longer and stronger incorrect-response preparations, and a more mature pattern of correct-response preparation (shorter peak-latencies), underlying correct responses on Stroop-interference trials. Neural markers of response-inhibition were comparable between groups and no behavioral differences were found between-groups on the Stroop task. Results suggest group differences in underlying mechanisms of centroparietal motor-response preparation mechanisms in this age group, contrary to what has been shown using behavioral tasks previously. We discuss neural results in the context of speed-accuracy trade-offs. This is the first study to examine neural markers of motor-responses in bilingual children. Keywords: Inhibitory control, Bilingual children, Lateralized readiness potentials (LRP), Event-related potentials (ERP), Response inhibition, Stroop taskhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878929319303275 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Srishti Nayak Hiba Z. Salem Amanda R. Tarullo |
spellingShingle |
Srishti Nayak Hiba Z. Salem Amanda R. Tarullo Neural mechanisms of response-preparation and inhibition in bilingual and monolingual children: Lateralized Readiness Potentials (LRPs) during a nonverbal Stroop task Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience |
author_facet |
Srishti Nayak Hiba Z. Salem Amanda R. Tarullo |
author_sort |
Srishti Nayak |
title |
Neural mechanisms of response-preparation and inhibition in bilingual and monolingual children: Lateralized Readiness Potentials (LRPs) during a nonverbal Stroop task |
title_short |
Neural mechanisms of response-preparation and inhibition in bilingual and monolingual children: Lateralized Readiness Potentials (LRPs) during a nonverbal Stroop task |
title_full |
Neural mechanisms of response-preparation and inhibition in bilingual and monolingual children: Lateralized Readiness Potentials (LRPs) during a nonverbal Stroop task |
title_fullStr |
Neural mechanisms of response-preparation and inhibition in bilingual and monolingual children: Lateralized Readiness Potentials (LRPs) during a nonverbal Stroop task |
title_full_unstemmed |
Neural mechanisms of response-preparation and inhibition in bilingual and monolingual children: Lateralized Readiness Potentials (LRPs) during a nonverbal Stroop task |
title_sort |
neural mechanisms of response-preparation and inhibition in bilingual and monolingual children: lateralized readiness potentials (lrps) during a nonverbal stroop task |
publisher |
Elsevier |
series |
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience |
issn |
1878-9293 |
publishDate |
2020-02-01 |
description |
Inhibitory control is a core executive function (EF) skill, thought to involve cognitive ‘interference suppression’ and motor ‘response inhibition’ sub-processes. A few studies have shown that early bilingualism shapes interference suppression but not response inhibition skills, however current behavioral measures do not fully allow us to disentangle these subcomponents. Lateralized Readiness Potentials (LRPs) are centroparietal event-related potentials (ERPs) that track motor response-preparations between stimulus-presentation and behavioral responses. We examine LRPs elicited during successful inhibitory control on a nonverbal Stroop task, in 6–8 year-old bilingual (n = 44) and monolingual (n = 48) children from comparable socio-economic backgrounds. Relative to monolinguals, bilinguals showed longer and stronger incorrect-response preparations, and a more mature pattern of correct-response preparation (shorter peak-latencies), underlying correct responses on Stroop-interference trials. Neural markers of response-inhibition were comparable between groups and no behavioral differences were found between-groups on the Stroop task. Results suggest group differences in underlying mechanisms of centroparietal motor-response preparation mechanisms in this age group, contrary to what has been shown using behavioral tasks previously. We discuss neural results in the context of speed-accuracy trade-offs. This is the first study to examine neural markers of motor-responses in bilingual children. Keywords: Inhibitory control, Bilingual children, Lateralized readiness potentials (LRP), Event-related potentials (ERP), Response inhibition, Stroop task |
url |
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878929319303275 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT srishtinayak neuralmechanismsofresponsepreparationandinhibitioninbilingualandmonolingualchildrenlateralizedreadinesspotentialslrpsduringanonverbalstrooptask AT hibazsalem neuralmechanismsofresponsepreparationandinhibitioninbilingualandmonolingualchildrenlateralizedreadinesspotentialslrpsduringanonverbalstrooptask AT amandartarullo neuralmechanismsofresponsepreparationandinhibitioninbilingualandmonolingualchildrenlateralizedreadinesspotentialslrpsduringanonverbalstrooptask |
_version_ |
1725447632289005568 |