The Analysis of Biomechanical Properties of Proximal Femur after Implant Removal

Introduction. To compare the biomechanical stability of the femur following the removal of proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA-II) and dynamic hip screw (DHS). Material and Methods. 56 paired cadaveric femurs were used as experimental and control groups. In the experimental group, PFNA-II and D...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jae Hyuk Yang, Tae Gon Jung, Arjun Rupanagudi Honnurappa, Jae Min Cha, Chang Hwa Ham, Tae Yoon Kim, Seung Woo Suh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2016-01-01
Series:Applied Bionics and Biomechanics
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4987831
id doaj-e51800e15e674bb1ba801b149f95e93f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e51800e15e674bb1ba801b149f95e93f2021-07-02T03:45:23ZengHindawi LimitedApplied Bionics and Biomechanics1176-23221754-21032016-01-01201610.1155/2016/49878314987831The Analysis of Biomechanical Properties of Proximal Femur after Implant RemovalJae Hyuk Yang0Tae Gon Jung1Arjun Rupanagudi Honnurappa2Jae Min Cha3Chang Hwa Ham4Tae Yoon Kim5Seung Woo Suh6Scoliosis Research Institute, Department of Orthopedics, Korea University Medical College, Guro Hospital, Guro 2-dong, Guro-gu, Seoul 152-703, Republic of KoreaOsong Medical Innovation Foundation, Medical Device Development Center, Cheongju 363-951, Republic of KoreaScoliosis Research Institute, Department of Orthopedics, Korea University Medical College, Guro Hospital, Guro 2-dong, Guro-gu, Seoul 152-703, Republic of KoreaThe Division of Biological Sciences at The University of Chicago, Undergraduate Class of 2014, 5801 South Ellis Avenue Chicago, IL 60637, USAScoliosis Research Institute, Department of Orthopedics, Korea University Medical College, Guro Hospital, Guro 2-dong, Guro-gu, Seoul 152-703, Republic of KoreaJung-Hwa Girls High School, San 105 Beomeo-4-dong Sunsung-gu, Daegu 706-819, Republic of KoreaScoliosis Research Institute, Department of Orthopedics, Korea University Medical College, Guro Hospital, Guro 2-dong, Guro-gu, Seoul 152-703, Republic of KoreaIntroduction. To compare the biomechanical stability of the femur following the removal of proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA-II) and dynamic hip screw (DHS). Material and Methods. 56 paired cadaveric femurs were used as experimental and control groups. In the experimental group, PFNA-II and DHS were randomly inserted into femurs on both sides and then removed. Thereafter, compression load was applied until fracture occurred; biomechanical stability of the femurs and associated fracture patterns were studied. Results. The ultimate load and stiffness of the control group were 6227.8±1694.1 N and 990.5±99.8 N/mm, respectively. These were significantly higher than experimental group (p=0.014, <0.001) following the removal of PFNA-II (4085.6±1628.03 N and 656.3±155.3 N/mm) and DHS (4001.9±1588.3 N and 656.3±155.3 N/mm). No statistical differences in these values were found between the 2 device groups (p=0.84, 0.71), regardless of age groups. However, fracture patterns were different between two devices, intertrochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures. Conclusions. Mechanical stability of the proximal femurs does not differ after the removal of 2 different of fixation devices regardless of the age. However, it was significantly lower compared to an intact femur. Different fracture patterns have been shown following the removal of different fixation devices as there are variations in the site of stress risers for individual implants.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4987831
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jae Hyuk Yang
Tae Gon Jung
Arjun Rupanagudi Honnurappa
Jae Min Cha
Chang Hwa Ham
Tae Yoon Kim
Seung Woo Suh
spellingShingle Jae Hyuk Yang
Tae Gon Jung
Arjun Rupanagudi Honnurappa
Jae Min Cha
Chang Hwa Ham
Tae Yoon Kim
Seung Woo Suh
The Analysis of Biomechanical Properties of Proximal Femur after Implant Removal
Applied Bionics and Biomechanics
author_facet Jae Hyuk Yang
Tae Gon Jung
Arjun Rupanagudi Honnurappa
Jae Min Cha
Chang Hwa Ham
Tae Yoon Kim
Seung Woo Suh
author_sort Jae Hyuk Yang
title The Analysis of Biomechanical Properties of Proximal Femur after Implant Removal
title_short The Analysis of Biomechanical Properties of Proximal Femur after Implant Removal
title_full The Analysis of Biomechanical Properties of Proximal Femur after Implant Removal
title_fullStr The Analysis of Biomechanical Properties of Proximal Femur after Implant Removal
title_full_unstemmed The Analysis of Biomechanical Properties of Proximal Femur after Implant Removal
title_sort analysis of biomechanical properties of proximal femur after implant removal
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Applied Bionics and Biomechanics
issn 1176-2322
1754-2103
publishDate 2016-01-01
description Introduction. To compare the biomechanical stability of the femur following the removal of proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA-II) and dynamic hip screw (DHS). Material and Methods. 56 paired cadaveric femurs were used as experimental and control groups. In the experimental group, PFNA-II and DHS were randomly inserted into femurs on both sides and then removed. Thereafter, compression load was applied until fracture occurred; biomechanical stability of the femurs and associated fracture patterns were studied. Results. The ultimate load and stiffness of the control group were 6227.8±1694.1 N and 990.5±99.8 N/mm, respectively. These were significantly higher than experimental group (p=0.014, <0.001) following the removal of PFNA-II (4085.6±1628.03 N and 656.3±155.3 N/mm) and DHS (4001.9±1588.3 N and 656.3±155.3 N/mm). No statistical differences in these values were found between the 2 device groups (p=0.84, 0.71), regardless of age groups. However, fracture patterns were different between two devices, intertrochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures. Conclusions. Mechanical stability of the proximal femurs does not differ after the removal of 2 different of fixation devices regardless of the age. However, it was significantly lower compared to an intact femur. Different fracture patterns have been shown following the removal of different fixation devices as there are variations in the site of stress risers for individual implants.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4987831
work_keys_str_mv AT jaehyukyang theanalysisofbiomechanicalpropertiesofproximalfemurafterimplantremoval
AT taegonjung theanalysisofbiomechanicalpropertiesofproximalfemurafterimplantremoval
AT arjunrupanagudihonnurappa theanalysisofbiomechanicalpropertiesofproximalfemurafterimplantremoval
AT jaemincha theanalysisofbiomechanicalpropertiesofproximalfemurafterimplantremoval
AT changhwaham theanalysisofbiomechanicalpropertiesofproximalfemurafterimplantremoval
AT taeyoonkim theanalysisofbiomechanicalpropertiesofproximalfemurafterimplantremoval
AT seungwoosuh theanalysisofbiomechanicalpropertiesofproximalfemurafterimplantremoval
AT jaehyukyang analysisofbiomechanicalpropertiesofproximalfemurafterimplantremoval
AT taegonjung analysisofbiomechanicalpropertiesofproximalfemurafterimplantremoval
AT arjunrupanagudihonnurappa analysisofbiomechanicalpropertiesofproximalfemurafterimplantremoval
AT jaemincha analysisofbiomechanicalpropertiesofproximalfemurafterimplantremoval
AT changhwaham analysisofbiomechanicalpropertiesofproximalfemurafterimplantremoval
AT taeyoonkim analysisofbiomechanicalpropertiesofproximalfemurafterimplantremoval
AT seungwoosuh analysisofbiomechanicalpropertiesofproximalfemurafterimplantremoval
_version_ 1721341184154009600