The Analysis of Biomechanical Properties of Proximal Femur after Implant Removal
Introduction. To compare the biomechanical stability of the femur following the removal of proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA-II) and dynamic hip screw (DHS). Material and Methods. 56 paired cadaveric femurs were used as experimental and control groups. In the experimental group, PFNA-II and D...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Hindawi Limited
2016-01-01
|
Series: | Applied Bionics and Biomechanics |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4987831 |
id |
doaj-e51800e15e674bb1ba801b149f95e93f |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-e51800e15e674bb1ba801b149f95e93f2021-07-02T03:45:23ZengHindawi LimitedApplied Bionics and Biomechanics1176-23221754-21032016-01-01201610.1155/2016/49878314987831The Analysis of Biomechanical Properties of Proximal Femur after Implant RemovalJae Hyuk Yang0Tae Gon Jung1Arjun Rupanagudi Honnurappa2Jae Min Cha3Chang Hwa Ham4Tae Yoon Kim5Seung Woo Suh6Scoliosis Research Institute, Department of Orthopedics, Korea University Medical College, Guro Hospital, Guro 2-dong, Guro-gu, Seoul 152-703, Republic of KoreaOsong Medical Innovation Foundation, Medical Device Development Center, Cheongju 363-951, Republic of KoreaScoliosis Research Institute, Department of Orthopedics, Korea University Medical College, Guro Hospital, Guro 2-dong, Guro-gu, Seoul 152-703, Republic of KoreaThe Division of Biological Sciences at The University of Chicago, Undergraduate Class of 2014, 5801 South Ellis Avenue Chicago, IL 60637, USAScoliosis Research Institute, Department of Orthopedics, Korea University Medical College, Guro Hospital, Guro 2-dong, Guro-gu, Seoul 152-703, Republic of KoreaJung-Hwa Girls High School, San 105 Beomeo-4-dong Sunsung-gu, Daegu 706-819, Republic of KoreaScoliosis Research Institute, Department of Orthopedics, Korea University Medical College, Guro Hospital, Guro 2-dong, Guro-gu, Seoul 152-703, Republic of KoreaIntroduction. To compare the biomechanical stability of the femur following the removal of proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA-II) and dynamic hip screw (DHS). Material and Methods. 56 paired cadaveric femurs were used as experimental and control groups. In the experimental group, PFNA-II and DHS were randomly inserted into femurs on both sides and then removed. Thereafter, compression load was applied until fracture occurred; biomechanical stability of the femurs and associated fracture patterns were studied. Results. The ultimate load and stiffness of the control group were 6227.8±1694.1 N and 990.5±99.8 N/mm, respectively. These were significantly higher than experimental group (p=0.014, <0.001) following the removal of PFNA-II (4085.6±1628.03 N and 656.3±155.3 N/mm) and DHS (4001.9±1588.3 N and 656.3±155.3 N/mm). No statistical differences in these values were found between the 2 device groups (p=0.84, 0.71), regardless of age groups. However, fracture patterns were different between two devices, intertrochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures. Conclusions. Mechanical stability of the proximal femurs does not differ after the removal of 2 different of fixation devices regardless of the age. However, it was significantly lower compared to an intact femur. Different fracture patterns have been shown following the removal of different fixation devices as there are variations in the site of stress risers for individual implants.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4987831 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Jae Hyuk Yang Tae Gon Jung Arjun Rupanagudi Honnurappa Jae Min Cha Chang Hwa Ham Tae Yoon Kim Seung Woo Suh |
spellingShingle |
Jae Hyuk Yang Tae Gon Jung Arjun Rupanagudi Honnurappa Jae Min Cha Chang Hwa Ham Tae Yoon Kim Seung Woo Suh The Analysis of Biomechanical Properties of Proximal Femur after Implant Removal Applied Bionics and Biomechanics |
author_facet |
Jae Hyuk Yang Tae Gon Jung Arjun Rupanagudi Honnurappa Jae Min Cha Chang Hwa Ham Tae Yoon Kim Seung Woo Suh |
author_sort |
Jae Hyuk Yang |
title |
The Analysis of Biomechanical Properties of Proximal Femur after Implant Removal |
title_short |
The Analysis of Biomechanical Properties of Proximal Femur after Implant Removal |
title_full |
The Analysis of Biomechanical Properties of Proximal Femur after Implant Removal |
title_fullStr |
The Analysis of Biomechanical Properties of Proximal Femur after Implant Removal |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Analysis of Biomechanical Properties of Proximal Femur after Implant Removal |
title_sort |
analysis of biomechanical properties of proximal femur after implant removal |
publisher |
Hindawi Limited |
series |
Applied Bionics and Biomechanics |
issn |
1176-2322 1754-2103 |
publishDate |
2016-01-01 |
description |
Introduction. To compare the biomechanical stability of the femur following the removal of proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA-II) and dynamic hip screw (DHS). Material and Methods. 56 paired cadaveric femurs were used as experimental and control groups. In the experimental group, PFNA-II and DHS were randomly inserted into femurs on both sides and then removed. Thereafter, compression load was applied until fracture occurred; biomechanical stability of the femurs and associated fracture patterns were studied. Results. The ultimate load and stiffness of the control group were 6227.8±1694.1 N and 990.5±99.8 N/mm, respectively. These were significantly higher than experimental group (p=0.014, <0.001) following the removal of PFNA-II (4085.6±1628.03 N and 656.3±155.3 N/mm) and DHS (4001.9±1588.3 N and 656.3±155.3 N/mm). No statistical differences in these values were found between the 2 device groups (p=0.84, 0.71), regardless of age groups. However, fracture patterns were different between two devices, intertrochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures. Conclusions. Mechanical stability of the proximal femurs does not differ after the removal of 2 different of fixation devices regardless of the age. However, it was significantly lower compared to an intact femur. Different fracture patterns have been shown following the removal of different fixation devices as there are variations in the site of stress risers for individual implants. |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4987831 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT jaehyukyang theanalysisofbiomechanicalpropertiesofproximalfemurafterimplantremoval AT taegonjung theanalysisofbiomechanicalpropertiesofproximalfemurafterimplantremoval AT arjunrupanagudihonnurappa theanalysisofbiomechanicalpropertiesofproximalfemurafterimplantremoval AT jaemincha theanalysisofbiomechanicalpropertiesofproximalfemurafterimplantremoval AT changhwaham theanalysisofbiomechanicalpropertiesofproximalfemurafterimplantremoval AT taeyoonkim theanalysisofbiomechanicalpropertiesofproximalfemurafterimplantremoval AT seungwoosuh theanalysisofbiomechanicalpropertiesofproximalfemurafterimplantremoval AT jaehyukyang analysisofbiomechanicalpropertiesofproximalfemurafterimplantremoval AT taegonjung analysisofbiomechanicalpropertiesofproximalfemurafterimplantremoval AT arjunrupanagudihonnurappa analysisofbiomechanicalpropertiesofproximalfemurafterimplantremoval AT jaemincha analysisofbiomechanicalpropertiesofproximalfemurafterimplantremoval AT changhwaham analysisofbiomechanicalpropertiesofproximalfemurafterimplantremoval AT taeyoonkim analysisofbiomechanicalpropertiesofproximalfemurafterimplantremoval AT seungwoosuh analysisofbiomechanicalpropertiesofproximalfemurafterimplantremoval |
_version_ |
1721341184154009600 |