Equality over intentionality: The normative social preferences of neutral third-parties.

This paper studies whether intentionality is more prevalent than fairness in social preferences. We do this by introducing a new three-player game in which the choices of neutral third-party arbiters are isolated from any monetary or strategic concerns. This allows us to study the normative preferen...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ciril Bosch-Rosa
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2018-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6235270?pdf=render
id doaj-e5121027db3b4e7d94c7f5da571f320b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e5121027db3b4e7d94c7f5da571f320b2020-11-24T22:03:59ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032018-01-011311e020524010.1371/journal.pone.0205240Equality over intentionality: The normative social preferences of neutral third-parties.Ciril Bosch-RosaThis paper studies whether intentionality is more prevalent than fairness in social preferences. We do this by introducing a new three-player game in which the choices of neutral third-party arbiters are isolated from any monetary or strategic concerns. This allows us to study the normative preferences of subjects, and to compare the relative weight they give to intentions and inequality. The results show that arbiters are mainly concerned with inequality, while other's (selfish) intentions seem to play a minor role in their preferences. This result is robust to a series of experimental designs, suggesting that the role of intentions in social preferences might be smaller than implied by the previous literature.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6235270?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ciril Bosch-Rosa
spellingShingle Ciril Bosch-Rosa
Equality over intentionality: The normative social preferences of neutral third-parties.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Ciril Bosch-Rosa
author_sort Ciril Bosch-Rosa
title Equality over intentionality: The normative social preferences of neutral third-parties.
title_short Equality over intentionality: The normative social preferences of neutral third-parties.
title_full Equality over intentionality: The normative social preferences of neutral third-parties.
title_fullStr Equality over intentionality: The normative social preferences of neutral third-parties.
title_full_unstemmed Equality over intentionality: The normative social preferences of neutral third-parties.
title_sort equality over intentionality: the normative social preferences of neutral third-parties.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2018-01-01
description This paper studies whether intentionality is more prevalent than fairness in social preferences. We do this by introducing a new three-player game in which the choices of neutral third-party arbiters are isolated from any monetary or strategic concerns. This allows us to study the normative preferences of subjects, and to compare the relative weight they give to intentions and inequality. The results show that arbiters are mainly concerned with inequality, while other's (selfish) intentions seem to play a minor role in their preferences. This result is robust to a series of experimental designs, suggesting that the role of intentions in social preferences might be smaller than implied by the previous literature.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6235270?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT cirilboschrosa equalityoverintentionalitythenormativesocialpreferencesofneutralthirdparties
_version_ 1725831289492209664