Why Do Field-Based Methods Fail to Model Plasmonics?

The paper studies plasmonics modeling issues and examines the reasons behind the failure of the field-based methods relying on Padé approximations widely used in the analysis of photonic devices based on dielectric materials. Through a study of evanescent, radiation, guided, and surface...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: A. M. A. Said, A. M. Heikal, Nihal F. F. Areed, S. S. A. Obayya
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IEEE 2016-01-01
Series:IEEE Photonics Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7543475/
id doaj-e4f1fd970a1d475e87579dc5b99dd65d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e4f1fd970a1d475e87579dc5b99dd65d2021-03-29T17:34:20ZengIEEEIEEE Photonics Journal1943-06552016-01-018511310.1109/JPHOT.2016.26003677543475Why Do Field-Based Methods Fail to Model Plasmonics?A. M. A. Said0A. M. Heikal1Nihal F. F. Areed2S. S. A. Obayya3Electronics and Communications Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Mansoura University, Mansoura, EgyptElectronics and Communications Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Mansoura University, Mansoura, EgyptElectronics and Communications Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Mansoura University, Mansoura, EgyptCenter for Photonics and Smart Materials, Zewail City of Science and Technology, Giza, EgyptThe paper studies plasmonics modeling issues and examines the reasons behind the failure of the field-based methods relying on Padé approximations widely used in the analysis of photonic devices based on dielectric materials. Through a study of evanescent, radiation, guided, and surface modes of a plasmonic structure where the failure appears clearly, we demonstrate the physical explanation of this failure and suggest some remedies. We developed a Bidirectional Beam Propagation Method (BiBPM) by adopting a Blocked Schur (BS) algorithm to introduce an unconditionally stable method for plasmonic structures with strong discontinuities. Central to BiBPMs is the accurate calculation of the square root operators that is very widely performed using Padé approximations. However, recent reports demonstrate convergence of Padé that is too slow to lend itself a stable solver in plasmonics. Moreover, Padé approximations completely fail in handling such a strong discontinuity between dielectric and plasmonic waveguides, where a very-wide spectrum of modes could be excited. Alternatively, we propose calculating these operators by the twice faster BS algorithm. Beyond the computational speed, our suggested approach overbears the Padé-based BiBPMs instability and accuracy problems, thanks to the proper physical treatment of surface and evanescent waves: the notorious sources of instability. Through the plasmonic discontinuity problems, the superiority of BS approach has been determined numerically and explained physically.https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7543475/Bidirectional Beam Propagation Method (BiBPM)blocked schurdielectric waveguideshigh-index-contrast discontinuityplasmonic couplerplasmonic waveguides
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author A. M. A. Said
A. M. Heikal
Nihal F. F. Areed
S. S. A. Obayya
spellingShingle A. M. A. Said
A. M. Heikal
Nihal F. F. Areed
S. S. A. Obayya
Why Do Field-Based Methods Fail to Model Plasmonics?
IEEE Photonics Journal
Bidirectional Beam Propagation Method (BiBPM)
blocked schur
dielectric waveguides
high-index-contrast discontinuity
plasmonic coupler
plasmonic waveguides
author_facet A. M. A. Said
A. M. Heikal
Nihal F. F. Areed
S. S. A. Obayya
author_sort A. M. A. Said
title Why Do Field-Based Methods Fail to Model Plasmonics?
title_short Why Do Field-Based Methods Fail to Model Plasmonics?
title_full Why Do Field-Based Methods Fail to Model Plasmonics?
title_fullStr Why Do Field-Based Methods Fail to Model Plasmonics?
title_full_unstemmed Why Do Field-Based Methods Fail to Model Plasmonics?
title_sort why do field-based methods fail to model plasmonics?
publisher IEEE
series IEEE Photonics Journal
issn 1943-0655
publishDate 2016-01-01
description The paper studies plasmonics modeling issues and examines the reasons behind the failure of the field-based methods relying on Padé approximations widely used in the analysis of photonic devices based on dielectric materials. Through a study of evanescent, radiation, guided, and surface modes of a plasmonic structure where the failure appears clearly, we demonstrate the physical explanation of this failure and suggest some remedies. We developed a Bidirectional Beam Propagation Method (BiBPM) by adopting a Blocked Schur (BS) algorithm to introduce an unconditionally stable method for plasmonic structures with strong discontinuities. Central to BiBPMs is the accurate calculation of the square root operators that is very widely performed using Padé approximations. However, recent reports demonstrate convergence of Padé that is too slow to lend itself a stable solver in plasmonics. Moreover, Padé approximations completely fail in handling such a strong discontinuity between dielectric and plasmonic waveguides, where a very-wide spectrum of modes could be excited. Alternatively, we propose calculating these operators by the twice faster BS algorithm. Beyond the computational speed, our suggested approach overbears the Padé-based BiBPMs instability and accuracy problems, thanks to the proper physical treatment of surface and evanescent waves: the notorious sources of instability. Through the plasmonic discontinuity problems, the superiority of BS approach has been determined numerically and explained physically.
topic Bidirectional Beam Propagation Method (BiBPM)
blocked schur
dielectric waveguides
high-index-contrast discontinuity
plasmonic coupler
plasmonic waveguides
url https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7543475/
work_keys_str_mv AT amasaid whydofieldbasedmethodsfailtomodelplasmonics
AT amheikal whydofieldbasedmethodsfailtomodelplasmonics
AT nihalffareed whydofieldbasedmethodsfailtomodelplasmonics
AT ssaobayya whydofieldbasedmethodsfailtomodelplasmonics
_version_ 1724197672747794432