Comparison Between Seller and Buyer Pricing Systems for Energy Trading in Microgrids
In this paper, two systems for energy trading among energy prosumers are proposed: a buyer-pricing-system (BPS), in which buyers determine the price of energy and a seller-pricing-system (SPS) in which sellers determine the price of energy. In order to analyze the BPS, the competition among buyers i...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
IEEE
2019-01-01
|
Series: | IEEE Access |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8695014/ |
id |
doaj-e4ca7e8a8e1340198bcbb9d48cc2d628 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-e4ca7e8a8e1340198bcbb9d48cc2d6282021-03-29T22:02:26ZengIEEEIEEE Access2169-35362019-01-017540845409610.1109/ACCESS.2019.29127588695014Comparison Between Seller and Buyer Pricing Systems for Energy Trading in MicrogridsSohee Bae0Sangdon Park1https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5392-749XSchool of Electrical Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon, South KoreaInformation and Electronics Research Institute, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon, South KoreaIn this paper, two systems for energy trading among energy prosumers are proposed: a buyer-pricing-system (BPS), in which buyers determine the price of energy and a seller-pricing-system (SPS) in which sellers determine the price of energy. In order to analyze the BPS, the competition among buyers in the BPS is formulated as a strategic form game named energy-competition-game among buyers (ECG-AB). It is shown that the Nash equilibrium of the ECG-AB exists and furthermore is unique. Both systems are formulated by Stackelberg duopoly game model, and it is shown that there exists a unique subgame perfect equilibrium, which implies that each system is stable. Now, in the SPS, it is shown that an equilibrium solution of the Stackelberg duopoly game model does not reduce social welfare. Thus, the analysis shows that the considered systems are stable and efficient. In order to corroborate the analysis, simulation is performed and numerical results validate the analysis; a full simulation code to simulate the proposed systems is available on GitHub.https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8695014/Energy prosumerenergy tradingbuyer pricingseller pricingstackelberg duopoly |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Sohee Bae Sangdon Park |
spellingShingle |
Sohee Bae Sangdon Park Comparison Between Seller and Buyer Pricing Systems for Energy Trading in Microgrids IEEE Access Energy prosumer energy trading buyer pricing seller pricing stackelberg duopoly |
author_facet |
Sohee Bae Sangdon Park |
author_sort |
Sohee Bae |
title |
Comparison Between Seller and Buyer Pricing Systems for Energy Trading in Microgrids |
title_short |
Comparison Between Seller and Buyer Pricing Systems for Energy Trading in Microgrids |
title_full |
Comparison Between Seller and Buyer Pricing Systems for Energy Trading in Microgrids |
title_fullStr |
Comparison Between Seller and Buyer Pricing Systems for Energy Trading in Microgrids |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison Between Seller and Buyer Pricing Systems for Energy Trading in Microgrids |
title_sort |
comparison between seller and buyer pricing systems for energy trading in microgrids |
publisher |
IEEE |
series |
IEEE Access |
issn |
2169-3536 |
publishDate |
2019-01-01 |
description |
In this paper, two systems for energy trading among energy prosumers are proposed: a buyer-pricing-system (BPS), in which buyers determine the price of energy and a seller-pricing-system (SPS) in which sellers determine the price of energy. In order to analyze the BPS, the competition among buyers in the BPS is formulated as a strategic form game named energy-competition-game among buyers (ECG-AB). It is shown that the Nash equilibrium of the ECG-AB exists and furthermore is unique. Both systems are formulated by Stackelberg duopoly game model, and it is shown that there exists a unique subgame perfect equilibrium, which implies that each system is stable. Now, in the SPS, it is shown that an equilibrium solution of the Stackelberg duopoly game model does not reduce social welfare. Thus, the analysis shows that the considered systems are stable and efficient. In order to corroborate the analysis, simulation is performed and numerical results validate the analysis; a full simulation code to simulate the proposed systems is available on GitHub. |
topic |
Energy prosumer energy trading buyer pricing seller pricing stackelberg duopoly |
url |
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8695014/ |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT soheebae comparisonbetweensellerandbuyerpricingsystemsforenergytradinginmicrogrids AT sangdonpark comparisonbetweensellerandbuyerpricingsystemsforenergytradinginmicrogrids |
_version_ |
1724192330566598656 |