Cogeneration and Heat Recovery in the Industrial Process

Related to energy requirements for non-cellulose i. e. polyester production as an energy-intensive process, potential saving options are proposed. From the process data, it is evident that unit operations need electric and thermal energy in significant amounts. At the same time, improved energy mana...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vujasinović, E., Mihelić-Bogdanić, A., Budin, R.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Croatian Society of Chemical Engineers 2007-11-01
Series:Kemija u Industriji
Subjects:
Online Access:http://pierre.fkit.hr/hdki/kui/vol56/broj11/551.pdf
id doaj-e4bd1e5d5c1c4f559c33231804173bcf
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e4bd1e5d5c1c4f559c33231804173bcf2020-11-25T00:26:57ZengCroatian Society of Chemical EngineersKemija u Industriji0022-98301334-90902007-11-015611551555Cogeneration and Heat Recovery in the Industrial ProcessVujasinović, E.Mihelić-Bogdanić, A.Budin, R.Related to energy requirements for non-cellulose i. e. polyester production as an energy-intensive process, potential saving options are proposed. From the process data, it is evident that unit operations need electric and thermal energy in significant amounts. At the same time, improved energy management could be realized by applying a combined heat and power system (CHP) instead of the usually used process with separate heat and power production. In addition, the boiler flue gases with a sufficiently high outlet temperature could be used for combustion air preheating.Considering industrial process data, a calculation and comparison between the primary energy demand for conventional, CHP system and flue-gas heat recovery is presented. Comparison between separate heat and electricity production i.e. the conventional system with an overall efficiency of 55.6 % and CHP with efficiency of 85 %, shows an absolute efficiency increase of 29.4 %. Using an air preheater for combustion air temperature increasing saves 5.6 % of the fuel and at the same time diminishes thermal pollution because the exhaust flue-gas temperature becomes 77.3 °C instead of 204 °C. Conclusively, cogeneration and flue-gas heat recovery presentsfuel savings, which also implies economic and environmental benefits.http://pierre.fkit.hr/hdki/kui/vol56/broj11/551.pdfEnergy consumptioncogenerationflue gasesfuel savings
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Vujasinović, E.
Mihelić-Bogdanić, A.
Budin, R.
spellingShingle Vujasinović, E.
Mihelić-Bogdanić, A.
Budin, R.
Cogeneration and Heat Recovery in the Industrial Process
Kemija u Industriji
Energy consumption
cogeneration
flue gases
fuel savings
author_facet Vujasinović, E.
Mihelić-Bogdanić, A.
Budin, R.
author_sort Vujasinović, E.
title Cogeneration and Heat Recovery in the Industrial Process
title_short Cogeneration and Heat Recovery in the Industrial Process
title_full Cogeneration and Heat Recovery in the Industrial Process
title_fullStr Cogeneration and Heat Recovery in the Industrial Process
title_full_unstemmed Cogeneration and Heat Recovery in the Industrial Process
title_sort cogeneration and heat recovery in the industrial process
publisher Croatian Society of Chemical Engineers
series Kemija u Industriji
issn 0022-9830
1334-9090
publishDate 2007-11-01
description Related to energy requirements for non-cellulose i. e. polyester production as an energy-intensive process, potential saving options are proposed. From the process data, it is evident that unit operations need electric and thermal energy in significant amounts. At the same time, improved energy management could be realized by applying a combined heat and power system (CHP) instead of the usually used process with separate heat and power production. In addition, the boiler flue gases with a sufficiently high outlet temperature could be used for combustion air preheating.Considering industrial process data, a calculation and comparison between the primary energy demand for conventional, CHP system and flue-gas heat recovery is presented. Comparison between separate heat and electricity production i.e. the conventional system with an overall efficiency of 55.6 % and CHP with efficiency of 85 %, shows an absolute efficiency increase of 29.4 %. Using an air preheater for combustion air temperature increasing saves 5.6 % of the fuel and at the same time diminishes thermal pollution because the exhaust flue-gas temperature becomes 77.3 °C instead of 204 °C. Conclusively, cogeneration and flue-gas heat recovery presentsfuel savings, which also implies economic and environmental benefits.
topic Energy consumption
cogeneration
flue gases
fuel savings
url http://pierre.fkit.hr/hdki/kui/vol56/broj11/551.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT vujasinovice cogenerationandheatrecoveryintheindustrialprocess
AT mihelicbogdanica cogenerationandheatrecoveryintheindustrialprocess
AT budinr cogenerationandheatrecoveryintheindustrialprocess
_version_ 1725341784349868032